Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
LoneStormchaser

THE COMPLETE : SHIP STATS & RANK (as of 3-3-17)

37 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,941
[BOTES]
[BOTES]
Members
3,641 posts
18,948 battles

Wow V-25 OP WG plz nerf :ohmy:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,150
[HINON]
Privateers
6,266 posts
3,405 battles

Jesus, maybe I should buy a Mutsu.

 

Ha, and people thought a ship with 410's at T6 wouldn't do well. 

 

Edit: I just checked again. The Graf Spree tho 0.o 

Doing better than Belfast with WR. Not bad for a free ship. 

Edited by RivertheRoyal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,373
[INTEL]
Members
3,265 posts
6,614 battles

Notice that Perth is actually BELOW Pepsi? Perth is worse than Krispy Kreme.

Edited by CapnCappy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
448
[RCNW3]
Members
2,004 posts
27,011 battles

Hmmm, from a mathematical standpoint looks like a lot more battles on the + 50% side of winning would expect some balance around the 50% mark for battles and ships.  Seems like we are missing something on the calculation 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,043
[SALTY]
Members
8,930 posts
18,291 battles

Poor CV's.....especially the American ones.

 

They need some serious help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12,003
[SALVO]
Members
17,249 posts
10,454 battles

Something doesn't add up here, charts are seriously imbalanced over 50%. Are there so much people hiding stats that skews numbers in such way?. If so, this charts  are too distorted to pick something out of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Privateers
728 posts
9,377 battles

Sweet baby Jesus, that Taiho K/D

  DvUXIVDl.png

7.51, what the heck, it even beats the Hak

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
120
[-V-]
Members
830 posts
5,254 battles

Hmmm, from a mathematical standpoint looks like a lot more battles on the + 50% side of winning would expect some balance around the 50% mark for battles and ships.  Seems like we are missing something on the calculation 

 

The results posted are from

http://na.wows-numbers.com/ships/

Their update of info is much quicker and more reliable than warships/today.

But you are welcome to add the results, see what you get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
140
[CHIGR]
Members
243 posts
12,344 battles

LOL Taiho 7.51 K/D? Something seems wrong 

 

Taiho is the ultimate Kraken Farming machine now

Edited by Top_Gun_1999

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
153 posts
4,032 battles

Wow, look at those carriers,,,all Japan above all US.  Even the Saipan is in the middle of the pack.  2nd for US but dang. 

 

Almost all other Premium ships tend to trend toward the top of the stack too, kind of lends credence to Pay to win huh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
120
[-V-]
Members
830 posts
5,254 battles

Wow, look at those carriers,,,all Japan above all US.  Even the Saipan is in the middle of the pack.  2nd for US but dang. 

 

Almost all other Premium ships tend to trend toward the top of the stack too, kind of lends credence to Pay to win huh?

 

Take the Flint for example. This ship is only available to a very select few which are usually the best in the game. It's a no wonder why it's at the top. Same thing with the BB Nicolai. Not easily obtainable if at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
448
[RCNW3]
Members
2,004 posts
27,011 battles

 

The results posted are from

http://na.wows-numbers.com/ships/

Their update of info is much quicker and more reliable than warships/today.

But you are welcome to add the results, see what you get.

Do not feel like doing the math, but battles * the difference in the ships winning % from the 50% mark should be balanced.  From looking at the results, unless some ship stats are missing, does not appear to the eyes to be correct.  Can't have 70 to 80% of the ships with a positive winning % unless you have some ships with a huge # of battles that suck.  Quick glance, I do not see that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17,550
[WOLF5]
Members
38,570 posts
31,222 battles

Notice that Perth is actually BELOW Pepsi? Perth is worse than Krispy Kreme.

 

Perth is an excellent ship and she gets away with things that most RN CLs cannot do, and a trick that not even Belfast can do.  Smoke on the move, HE+AP capability, and torpedoes.  The part where real skill comes in is when Smoke is on CD and you have to fight.  That is the most dangerous part as Perth's engagement range is for most parts, Brawling Range.

 

Sweet baby Jesus, that Taiho K/D

  DvUXIVDl.png

7.51, what the heck, it even beats the Hak

 

 

It makes sense when you think about it.  Tier IX Taiho is typically flown 2/3/2 (2 Ftr / 3 TB / 2 DB) Strike Spec.  Powerful, right?  Then recall that as a Tier IX ship, she accesses a new upgrade slot.  In that slot she can slot an upgrade to bring +15% HP to her attack aircraft.  Add onto that that she as a Tier IX can potentially face Tier VII ships.  Yes.  Sure, she mostly rides the high tier matches but Taiho can Seal Club Tier VII's.

Edited by HazeGrayUnderway

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,840
[RLGN]
Members
19,261 posts
35,694 battles

Notice that Perth is actually BELOW Pepsi? Perth is worse than Krispy Kreme.

 

Of course it is, it's nothing more than a variant of the amazingly worthless (to me personally) Leander; I do like the amusing mobile smoke screen though.

 

Krasny Krym with it's massive pewpew rof and glazed-sugar armor has done very well by me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
120
[-V-]
Members
830 posts
5,254 battles

Do not feel like doing the math, but battles * the difference in the ships winning % from the 50% mark should be balanced.  From looking at the results, unless some ship stats are missing, does not appear to the eyes to be correct.  Can't have 70 to 80% of the ships with a positive winning % unless you have some ships with a huge # of battles that suck.  Quick glance, I do not see that

 

I saw that too, but the only conclusion I could come up with was one word.....UNICUMS.....They play such a wide variety of different ships, and they are really good in all of them. Also, most of the top ships aren't played as often as the rest of the ships.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,678
Beta Testers
4,735 posts
7,019 battles

 the americans will never  recover from that CV humiliation.

imperator nikolai as the numbah one is a bad omen about the soviet bbs coming.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17,550
[WOLF5]
Members
38,570 posts
31,222 battles

 

CARRIERS

NyxPypm.jpg

 

Let that be a warning to anyone on the fence, "Which CV line should I work on?  Hmmm..."

 

There's some comedy going on also.  Zuiho performs like she's worth 2 Bogues for every one of her.

Edited by HazeGrayUnderway

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
448
[RCNW3]
Members
2,004 posts
27,011 battles

 

I saw that too, but the only conclusion I could come up with was one word.....UNICUMS.....They play such a wide variety of different ships, and they are really good in all of them. Also, most of the top ships aren't played as often as the rest of the ships.

From lists 36 out of 171 listed ships have a winning % below 50%.  That is 21%.  From that quick calculation there is something missing here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
873
[SCCC]
Members
3,181 posts
17,515 battles

The USN CV statistics are disgusting. I warned that Midway was being nerfed way too much before the nerfs went through. Nobody listened to me, it was just the usual crowd chanting "Death to CVs!" All high tier USN CVs are just piles of garbage compared to the IJN counterparts. High tier USN CVs absolutely need two torpedo bomber squadrons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
120
[-V-]
Members
830 posts
5,254 battles

 

Let that be a warning to anyone on the fence, "Which CV line should I work on?  Hmmm..."

 

Yeah, but it looks like most players stop playing CV's at tier 6 & 7.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,521
[WOLF7]
Members
12,620 posts

Poor CV's.....especially the American ones.

 

They need some serious help.

 

USA is populating the bottom numbers in every category....CV's are simply the most embarrassing...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×