Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Cit_the_bed

Low skill players with no desire to improve are killing this game

169 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

4,101
[-VT-]
[-VT-]
Members
2,435 posts
27,399 battles

Low skill players with no desire to improve are killing this game. You can hard carry all the time and

still lose. 

 

This game needs matchmaking based on player skill or win rate ASAP.

 

 

  • Cool 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,849
[AXANR]
Members
3,650 posts
23,502 battles

Low skill players with no desire to improve are killing this game. You can hard carry all the time and

still lose. 

 

This game needs matchmaking based on player skill or win rate ASAP.

 

If you're hard carrying ALL the time and still losing, you're not carrying hard enough. Because the potatoes are on the other team as much as they are yours, over a large enough sample size. 

  • Cool 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
611
[SYN]
Members
2,861 posts
10,456 battles

How about the people that stubbornly play US carriers despite the them all being hilariously UP except Saipan and Langley. Needless to say, I am tired of losing games because idiots dont get the hint, their ship is UP as [edited]and is throwing games because of it.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[KNTAI]
Members
3,134 posts
9,120 battles

I can agree with the sentiment. At times, when you try to give some advise you get the funniest of rebuttals. Sometimes, snowflakes will be snowflakes. What can you do about it? :child:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
121
[TAFY3]
[TAFY3]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
460 posts
12,775 battles

How about the people that stubbornly play US carriers despite the them all being hilariously UP except Saipan and Langley. Needless to say, I am tired of losing games because idiots dont get the hint, their ship is UP as [edited]and is throwing games because of it.

 

What a horribly ignorant thing to say.  I had no idea that I was throwing games because I was grinding up the US carrier branch.  If everyone played as you wished there would be little variety in Random battles.  I can't wait until Ranked comes back so people with your attitude will stop playing Random battles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,835
Members
7,003 posts
15,423 battles

Low skill players with no desire to improve are killing this game. You can hard carry all the time and

still lose. 

 

This game needs matchmaking based on player skill or win rate ASAP.

 

 

 

WR does not = skill and there is no magic way to determine 'skill' in the game.
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
5,082 posts
5,575 battles

They aren't killing the game per se, just making it that much harder on those of us who play (and learn) to win.

 

It's a f2p mmo, potatoes gonna potate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
3,792 posts
23,987 battles

 

WR does not = skill and there is no magic way to determine 'skill' in the game.

 

I'm still waiting on one of these lunatics to define "skill". It's amazingly the most requested adjustment to MM but no one can define it.
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,882
[WTFS]
Members
9,337 posts
13,771 battles

Wow, elitist, much?

 

God forbid anyone just play a game because they like it. No, no let's all be just like you, constantly unhappy chasing that elusive thing called "a win." Thanks, but no thank you.

 

The player base isn't here to conform to how you perceive things should be.

  • Cool 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
4,515 posts
3,255 battles

There are more potatoes than unicums, they pay the bills and keep the lights on.  And provide you with good farming opportunities

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
353
[HKC]
Members
995 posts
27,531 battles

Low skill players with no desire to improve are killing this game. You can hard carry all the time and

still lose. 

 

This game needs matchmaking based on player skill or win rate ASAP.

 

 

 

Until WG introduces Beginner and Advanced team play arenas, their games will always be this way.  It is a money making machine, meant to be open to the masses.  Winning is nice, but isn't something one should ever expect.  So it is play your best and have fun.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
611
[SYN]
Members
2,861 posts
10,456 battles

 

What a horribly ignorant thing to say.  I had no idea that I was throwing games because I was grinding up the US carrier branch.  If everyone played as you wished there would be little variety in Random battles.  I can't wait until Ranked comes back so people with your attitude will stop playing Random battles.

 

Yes, you are, you are throwing gamer by playing USN carriers, that is a fact, because wargaming has done such a horrible job with CV balance. Fact is, not other ship line throws games as baldy as US CV's. So how about you show some common courtesy to your fellow players and leave the things in coop only until wargaming pulls their heads out of their asses and actually fixes the things. In case you haven't figured it out, CV's are unique in that the rest of the team generally cannot pull the dead weight of a bad CV, where as a poorly balanced non CV is much easier for the rest of the team to make up for that deficiency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20
[CYPHR]
Members
134 posts
12,483 battles

well we all start as ​potatoes and hope to be the super unicums but in realety most of us end up some where in the center mass

as for win rate u can still lose games with a kraken behinde your name and 50 % of your team still alive if u don't thake the caps

 

its a game and most people play it for fun not ho be the super unicum player

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,521
[HINON]
Members
14,340 posts

 

Yes, you are, you are throwing gamer by playing USN carriers, that is a fact, because wargaming has done such a horrible job with CV balance. Fact is, not other ship line throws games as baldy as US CV's. So how about you show some common courtesy to your fellow players and leave the things in coop only until wargaming pulls their heads out of their asses and actually fixes the things. In case you haven't figured it out, CV's are unique in that the rest of the team generally cannot pull the dead weight of a bad CV, where as a poorly balanced non CV is much easier for the rest of the team to make up for that deficiency.

 

Dictating what ships others play is a pretty lousy way to interact with your fellow players.
  • Cool 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
145
[K-P-M]
Members
1,616 posts
18,452 battles

 

I'm still waiting on one of these lunatics to define "skill". It's amazingly the most requested adjustment to MM but no one can define it.

 

I am in agreement with you.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,521
[WOLF7]
Members
12,620 posts

You realize that if you got rid off all the cannon fodder, this game would look like WOWP?:amazed:

Fact is, this isn't a highly competitive game, a majority of the players don't play regularly, don't learn much about the game. They are here to sail ships and shoot at stuff. If you haven't figured this out by now.....:hmm:

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
128 posts

I suck, but I try to get better.  I have fun and sometimes I really don't.  I try to help my team mates and most of the time a great idea, come to find out was'nt a great idea.  I don't team kill and I watch my torps.  I take caps, that come to find out my team does'nt want.  I try though.:B See ya'll around the pool.

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
90 posts
424 battles

Low skill players with no desire to improve are killing this game. You can hard carry all the time and

still lose. 

 

This game needs matchmaking based on player skill or win rate ASAP.

 

 

 

Lol me IRL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,322
[-K-]
Beta Testers
5,660 posts
19,594 battles

How about the people that stubbornly play US carriers despite the them all being hilariously UP except Saipan and Langley. Needless to say, I am tired of losing games because idiots dont get the hint, their ship is UP as [edited]and is throwing games because of it.

 

Yes, you are, you are throwing gamer by playing USN carriers, that is a fact, because wargaming has done such a horrible job with CV balance. Fact is, not other ship line throws games as baldy as US CV's. So how about you show some common courtesy to your fellow players and leave the things in coop only until wargaming pulls their heads out of their asses and actually fixes the things. In case you haven't figured it out, CV's are unique in that the rest of the team generally cannot pull the dead weight of a bad CV, where as a poorly balanced non CV is much easier for the rest of the team to make up for that deficiency.

 

 

All arguments about the validity of playing if you are not a skilled player aside, this is absolutely ridiculous. And a quick look at your CV stats makes me strongly suspect you have personal feelings clouding your objectivity on the matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
264
[-K--]
Members
589 posts
15,061 battles

Wow, elitist, much?

 

God forbid anyone just play a game because they like it. No, no let's all be just like you, constantly unhappy chasing that elusive thing called "a win." Thanks, but no thank you.

 

The player base isn't here to conform to how you perceive things should be.

 

You do know that winning is the literal only objective of every team vs. team game ever, right?

 

Roll dice on the floor of you want to pass the time without caring. But if you choose to play a team game, you're on a team and your job is to help your team win, not derp around and bring aggravation to everyone you get teamed up with. That's not elitism, that's a common-sense understanding of how team games work, and how to not be the worst.

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
363 posts
4,893 battles

agreed to many lazy boyz hanging out in the back of the map, they want there Tier 9s & 10s but then they dont want to get hit, i mean cmon you are in a tier 9 or 10 Act accordingly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,053
[SYN]
Members
16,027 posts
12,803 battles

It is true though.

 

Saipan is about the only USN CV that does well against Hiryu. Both stomp Ranger

Essex vs. Taiho is one of the worst matchups possible, because of how inflexible Essux loadout is in comparison to AS Taiho.

I especially like how AS Hakuryu can tie up all the bombers on Midway. That's sure fair and balanced.

Edited by MrDeaf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,882
[WTFS]
Members
9,337 posts
13,771 battles

 

You do know that winning is the literal only objective of every team vs. team game ever, right?

 

Roll dice on the floor of you want to pass the time without caring. But if you choose to play a team game, you're on a team and your job is to help your team win, not derp around and bring aggravation to everyone you get teamed up with. That's not elitism, that's a common-sense understanding of how team games work, and how to not be the worst.

 

No, it isn't, actually. One day, when you grasp the concepts of competition and fun, we can talk. Until then, please forget how to type.
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
11,026 posts
30,666 battles

WR does not = skill and there is no magic way to determine 'skill' in the game.

 

So....basically....you're trying to say that someone who wins more is not a better player than someone who wins less often?

 

Please, quit trying to delude yourself into thinking stats don't mean anything just because your stats don't match your overinflated self image.

Edited by issm
  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×