207 [-BRS-] Ducati_Black Members 472 posts 20,598 battles Report post #1 Posted January 11, 2017 I was just researching possibilities for the French line and saw this beastly looking thing: Your thoughts?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
691 [LLMF] StoptheViolins Alpha Tester 2,538 posts Report post #2 Posted January 11, 2017 Well they just updated the 2017 list to include a blurb on "two new French lines" which doesn't say BB right now it says "DD" and "Cruiser". But yeah, battleships would rock. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
531 Demon93IT Alpha Tester 1,879 posts 21 battles Report post #3 Posted January 11, 2017 Won't be a tier X, she's weaker than what we have there. Alsace should be at tier IX Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
207 [-BRS-] Ducati_Black Members 472 posts 20,598 battles Report post #4 Posted January 11, 2017 Won't be a tier X, she's weaker than what we have there. Alsace should be at tier IX Oh? That's as high of a BB I could find... Do you have a recommended replacement? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 [SEAL] ISBANMCBA Beta Testers 14 posts 11,463 battles Report post #5 Posted January 11, 2017 (edited) If WG does not plan to give the 380mm some magical penetration, it will likely be a T9 at most. Oh and 380mm cannot overmatch 27mm Baltimore, DM bow. Edited January 11, 2017 by ISBANMCBA Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,662 [CALM] YamatoA150 Beta Testers 6,838 posts 6,088 battles Report post #6 Posted January 11, 2017 Oh? That's as high of a BB I could find... Do you have a recommended replacement? No, but WG did say they have a French 450mm cannon with sufficient details to make it work in-game, but it is missing the intended hull that was to carry it. WG will likely make use of it on an enlarged/refined/evolved Alsace, for 12x 450mm, across 3 quad turrets. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
207 [-BRS-] Ducati_Black Members 472 posts 20,598 battles Report post #7 Posted January 11, 2017 If WG does not plan to give the 380mm some magical penetration, it will likely be a T9 at most. Oh and 380mm cannot overmatch 27mm Baltimore, DM bow. Ah gotcha...the wiki did say it could have gone up to 403. I don't know if that would have been much better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,455 [FOXEH] DoomStomper Beta Testers 3,985 posts 2,373 battles Report post #8 Posted January 11, 2017 Won't be a tier X, she's weaker than what we have there. Alsace should be at tier IX The T10 could be a scaled-up Alsace. IIRC, there were French proposals for 16"+ rifles that WG shouldn't have problems "uncovering sekret dokuments" for. Edit: Yamato-ninja'd Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3,370 Terrible_Turtle Members 5,202 posts Report post #9 Posted January 11, 2017 Taking the bow-in meta to entirely new levels... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,685 [-K-] Lord_Zath Supertest Coordinator, Alpha Tester, WoWS Community Contributors, Wiki Editor 6,526 posts 28,456 battles Report post #10 Posted January 11, 2017 how quickly can she reverse? 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
53 JinghisKhan Members 252 posts 3,108 battles Report post #11 Posted January 11, 2017 Tier VIII, IMHO. Not enough gun power to fit in with the 400mm + club that encompasses all of Tier IX and X, and her speed is nothing remarkable among them either. At Tier VIII, however, she'd be very well balanced against a Bismarck, with one more 380mm gun and a ferocious secondary battery that's basically the equivalent of strapping a Nurnberg's main guns on. Give her a high AA rating and a long secondary range (similar to the Bismarck), and she can do very well indeed. That being said, if you're also looking to add the Jean Bart at some point, you could give her 380mm guns higher overall penetration values and fit her in at Tier IX while saving the Richelieu/Jean Bart for Tier VIII instead. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,662 [CALM] YamatoA150 Beta Testers 6,838 posts 6,088 battles Report post #12 Posted January 11, 2017 Here's one example of the 450mm. Daigensui, on 10 September 2015 - 11:44 PM, said: Still looking to see if a design fitting the following gun could be found. 450 mm modèle 1920 Caliber: 450mm/45Total Weight: 128,000 kgLength: 21,070 mmBore: 20,260 mmLength of Rifling: 16,607.6 mmChamber Volume: 3,500 km/cm3Shell weight: 1,366 kgMuzzle velocity: 875 m/s Around 50cm penetration on belt at 10km and 34.4cm at 20km for the original soft cap AP. Nothing about deck armor penetration, since the French of 1920 weren't planning for plunging shots. Shell weight is about 300kg heavier than the Russian 16" shell planned for Sovetsky Soyuz and Project 24, and about 100kg heavier than the ShS shells used by Iowa and Montana. Caliber just allows for ignoring of some autobounce. Combined with pretty high velocity (only rivaled by possible T10 Italian and Russian BBs), would do some sizable damage. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,894 [HINON] Doomlock [HINON] Wiki Lead, Beta Testers, Privateers 6,801 posts 5,248 battles Report post #13 Posted January 11, 2017 Tier VIII, IMHO. Not enough gun power to fit in with the 400mm + club that encompasses all of Tier IX and X, and her speed is nothing remarkable among them either. At Tier VIII, however, she'd be very well balanced against a Bismarck, with one more 380mm gun and a ferocious secondary battery that's basically the equivalent of strapping a Nurnberg's main guns on. Give her a high AA rating and a long secondary range (similar to the Bismarck), and she can do very well indeed. That being said, if you're also looking to add the Jean Bart at some point, you could give her 380mm guns higher overall penetration values and fit her in at Tier IX while saving the Richelieu/Jean Bart for Tier VIII instead. Those aren't triple turrets friend, they're quad turrets. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
53 JinghisKhan Members 252 posts 3,108 battles Report post #14 Posted January 11, 2017 Those aren't triple turrets friend, they're quad turrets. Really? I know the Dunkuerque and Richelieu had quad 380mm turrets, but from what I read below and the graphic above, it looks like the Alsace was designed with triple turrets in mind. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alsace-class_battleship That being said, if they WERE quad turrets, I can easily see this being slotted in at Tier IX, using the profound number of barrels and a high ROF to act as a cruiser-killer and a permanent headache... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,662 [CALM] YamatoA150 Beta Testers 6,838 posts 6,088 battles Report post #15 Posted January 11, 2017 Really? I know the Dunkuerque and Richelieu had quad 380mm turrets, but from what I read below and the graphic above, it looks like the Alsace was designed with triple turrets in mind. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alsace-class_battleship That being said, if they WERE quad turrets, I can easily see this being slotted in at Tier IX, using the profound number of barrels and a high ROF to act as a cruiser-killer and a permanent headache... Wikipedia is showing me Quads: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
53 JinghisKhan Members 252 posts 3,108 battles Report post #16 Posted January 11, 2017 Ah-gotcha. I believe that's the N3 design you're referring to. The N1 design (listed under that picture on the Wikipedia page) uses triple turrets instead. It's a mix-up: Wikipedia uses the picture from the N3 but lists the loadout of the N1. From the 'Design' section of the page: "First, the main artillery consists in triple 380 mm turrets, for type n°1, in 406 mm triple turrets, for type n°2, in 380 mm quadruple turrets, for type n°3." Given the N3 turrets, I think it would be a solid fit at Tier IX. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
264 [-K--] wadavid Members 589 posts 14,723 battles Report post #17 Posted January 11, 2017 The diagrams make it look like it would have a very poor forward firing arc for the rear turret, but (somewhat) made up for by having two-thirds of its firepower up front (unlike e.g. the Kurfürst which also has derpy rear firing arcs but for half its guns). Looks like a fun ship. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
696 Judge_Doom Members 1,716 posts 8,224 battles Report post #18 Posted January 11, 2017 Looks like an interesting and fun ship to have in port, as long as it did not S.O.S. constantly for USN ships to come bail them out of trouble, even better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,662 [CALM] YamatoA150 Beta Testers 6,838 posts 6,088 battles Report post #19 Posted January 11, 2017 N3 is pretty ideal for T9. A logical evolution of the Richelieu at T8. And with 12 of those guns, can pile on a fair bit of hurt. Moreso if they go with an ideal 2.2rpm on the guns (at least on the final hull). All that remains is WG getting split turrets working (attempted in internal testing for Dunk, but shelved it after being unable to get it working) so that we have in effect 6 turrets that need to actually be destroyed to put Alsace out of commission (and 4 for Richelieu/Jean Bart and Dunk). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
13 [OPGS] LOVESOCK307 Beta Testers 61 posts 7,511 battles Report post #20 Posted January 11, 2017 Oh? That's as high of a BB I could find... Do you have a recommended replacement? Google the Super Alasace. It had multiple designs but the main one included 4x3 450mm guns. The 450s wee never built, nor were French 16" guns, only the 15" was ever in service. Will be interesting to see what they choose. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
21 anonym_CSdztHGM3fXS Members 657 posts Report post #21 Posted January 11, 2017 don't care what T10 is, simply want to see teh Danton in game Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
53 JinghisKhan Members 252 posts 3,108 battles Report post #22 Posted January 11, 2017 don't care what T10 is, simply want to see teh Danton in game Would be a decent Tier III BB, especially if you replace all the twin 240mm guns with single 305mm ones instead to give it a seven-gun broadside. The Courbet would have a 10-gun broadside and be too overpowered at Tier III (with the heaviest broadside and tied for highest speed), so she probably gets bumped to Tier IV instead. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,596 SyndicatedINC Members 2,263 posts 13,901 battles Report post #23 Posted January 11, 2017 Someone already posted a photoshop of what the T10 French BB should be Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
222 SirMuttonChops Beta Testers 408 posts 6,297 battles Report post #24 Posted January 11, 2017 Here's one example of the 450mm. Shell weight is about 300kg heavier than the Russian 16" shell planned for Sovetsky Soyuz and Project 24, but lighter than the ShS shells used by Iowa and Montana. Caliber just allows for ignoring of some autobounce. Combined with pretty high velocity (only rivaled by possible T10 Italian and Russian BBs), would offset the lack of AP damage from her lighter shells. Just a slight correction, if the 450mm/45 actually fired the described round, weighing 1,336 kg, it would be heavier than the SHS 16" shell fired by the Americans as that is usually quoted to weight 2700lbs (1227kg). If the round is indeed 1,366kg, that puts it at just over 3000lbs (3005.2lbs to be more precise) meaning it would just be shy of the Yamato's AP round which is usually quoted as 3200lbs iirc. So it's entirely possible to have the French guns hit harder than the American 16" but less then the IJN 18.1" if used in game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
53 JinghisKhan Members 252 posts 3,108 battles Report post #25 Posted January 11, 2017 Someone already posted a photoshop of what the T10 French BB should be PLOT TWIST: THOSE ARE ALL 240mm GUNS. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites