I seriously think the requirements will be more than wowp and wot

[Wake_Island]

I have a big big feeling that this game will be very hard to play for a low end computer and I can tell you right now 18 fps is not anywhere near enough to play this game like it is in wot.

So If your getting low fps on a windows screen don't expect to play.

I tested Battlestations Pacific with out my graphics card running I got 15 fps literaly unplayable unplayable.

So be warned this will be harder to play from what I infer from other ship games that will look like this.

that is all.

 

 

This is not in Alpha so I have nothing to give any hard evidnce other that the 15 seconds I saw of gameplay from a russian video.

Then I compared it to battlestations Pacific out of curiosty.

[JeeWeeJ]

Well, it all depends on how the programming is done. If it makes proper use of multicore CPU's there's actually a good chance that it'll run better than WoT. But having a PC on the lower end of the specs will always be tricky, as it's not always the hardware that is the problem, but you also have to take the load generated by windows into comsideration (which can be quite substantial if it's an old/corrupted windows install)

 

But, as always, we'll find out when testing starts!  :Smile_unsure:

[Crag_r]

Hey if i can manage 90 fps on WoWP, i think i am fine here http://forum.worldof...ile_glasses.gif

[Carrier_Enterprise]

Crag_r, on 17 October 2012 - 08:21 PM, said:

Hey if i can manage 90 fps on WoWP, i think i am fine here http://forum.worldof...ile_glasses.gif

We're not talking about the type of computer you have...

[HTRK74JR]

Hello people, I get 25-30 fps on WoT, but only 10 on WoWP, and thats not good enough. This will be damaging to my poor laptop, but luckily i will be getting a new gaming computer for xmas, hopefully. I have been saving up for a long time now.

[Panzer20000]

Really the only thing that worries me about how well my computer will be able to play this game is the water effects.

[QJW]

I mearly run a normal Windows 7 Laptop. i get about 25-40 fps on WOT and about, oh id say about 20-27 fps on WOWP. There shouldn't be a major difference between WOT lag and WOWP lag. think about it, in the end it's like playing arty but ur looking at your targer and they do the same. The FPS in my opinion shouldnt be a problem the WG does things, hopefully...

[Sonoskay]

HTRK74JR, on 18 October 2012 - 02:42 AM, said:

Hello people, I get 25-30 fps on WoT, but only 10 on WoWP, and thats not good enough. This will be damaging to my poor laptop, but luckily i will be getting a new gaming computer for xmas, hopefully. I have been saving up for a long time now.

my FPS is  actualy better on WOWP...

[DementedMind]

As long as they make an option of making water look like blue paper...then my computer will be fine, LOL!

 

In all seriously, My computer should be able to handle this game around 18-28 FPS with specific graphic settings.  I don't mind 18+ fps. :Smile_hiding:

[anonym_auUiRfWCi1jI]

Well, if it will  run on this, (Crag_r's main machine), it will run fine on yours.   :Smile_hiding:

http://oldcomputers....ics/trs80-i.jpg

[Mathayus]

They confirmed that the minimum requirements will be the same as WoT. To run it on maximum settings might need some higher end hardware but I don't think there will be any real big difference.

[JeeWeeJ]

Mathayus, on 18 October 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:

They confirmed that the minimum requirements will be the same as WoT. To run it on maximum settings might need some higher end hardware but I don't think there will be any real big difference.

Like someone else said, multicore support will help somewhat if you're on the lower end of the specs (when compared to WoT performance). But time will tell!  :Smile_smile:

[Mathayus]

JeeWeeJ, on 18 October 2012 - 12:21 PM, said:

Like someone else said, multicore support will help somewhat if you're on the lower end of the specs (when compared to WoT performance). But time will tell!  :Smile_smile:

They just need to get themselves an old-fashioned big, power consuming dual-core.

[JeeWeeJ]

Mathayus, on 18 October 2012 - 12:23 PM, said:

They just need to get themselves an old-fashioned big, power consuming dual-core.

Can you still get those? I actually think a newer quadcore CPU will be cheaper...and most of them go on the same CPU socket. (it's insane what shops dare to ask for "legacy" hardware these days...while the new stuff gets cheaper and cheaper)

[Wake_Island]

Hey try playing battlestations Pacific before you declared 18 even 24 fps playable.

[DementedMind]

Wake_Island, on 19 October 2012 - 01:11 AM, said:

Hey try playing battlestations Pacific before you declared 18 even 24 fps playable.

if WoWS actually support dual-core then I have nothing to worry about.  :Smile_honoring:

[NIN3]

Meh, even if I have to play it in square mode (where the settings are so low the tanks are replaced with squares) Id be happy to play  :Smile_great:

[Crag_r]

t42592, on 18 October 2012 - 07:16 AM, said:

Well, if it will  run on this, (Crag_r's main machine), it will run fine on yours.   :Smile_hiding:
http://oldcomputers....ics/trs80-i.jpg

So no one should be able to use the "lag" excuse again!

[Ariecho]

This is the first computer I ever owned.  I'm not sure if they ever sold them in the US, but they were quite popular in Europe.

 

[JeeWeeJ]

Ariecho, on 19 October 2012 - 02:02 PM, said:

This is the first computer I ever owned.  I'm not sure if they ever sold them in the US, but they were quite popular in Europe.

Cool, an Amstrad! From the same period as the Spectrum (same manufacturer), BBC Micro and Commodore 64 i believe?

I started with this (ok, it was my dad's, but still)

[Wake_Island]

All low through onboard graphics.
Its going to look like this the fps will be the same when your driving the ship.

I had  open my computer and unplug my gpu and that was work so please watch.

[JeeWeeJ]

Yeah, onboard GPU's pretty much suck for gaming (gaming laptops actually have a seperate graphics card built in). Just wondering, what kind of GPU do you use Wake, if things are that bad?

[marcin94r]

For sure the game will be challenging. But what najwarzniejsz game will support two rdzenowy processor. I personally counting on great graphics and high playability variable weather conditions, etc. It is what it is worth to wait.

[Cannonitus]

I'm sure the devs have these things in mind. I'm not too terribly worried but I know that I most likely won't be able to play on max settings.

[kbllox360]

having the option of several settings of the game, whoever has the most powerful pc will be able to enjoy a very beautiful game.