Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Willy55_1955

Radar or Hydroacoustic (Sonar), which is better?

Radar or Hydroacoustic, which is better?  

25 members have voted

  1. 1. Radar or Hydroacoustic, which do you believe is better or more useful.

    • Radar
      13
    • Hydroacoustic
      12

13 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
4,191 posts
12,721 battles

It depends on ship and situation for me . I like Radar for the range (8.? ) and Hydro acoustic for the time longer time it gives you .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
360
Members
2,072 posts
2,712 battles

The main thing Hydro can do that Radar cannot is expand torpedo detection ranges to the point where dodging the metal fish is about as trivial as dodging a battleship trying to ram your cruiser. It's more of a matter of being able to dodge DD attacks, as opposed to spotting the actual ships.

 

Radar, on the other hand, is hands-down better for actually finding the small buggers due to its large detection ranges, but you don't get the benefit of increased torpedo detection.

 

As far as it goes from a generalized standpoint, I'd probably give the edge to Radar, if only because it's more useful for actually removing the little ankle-biter from the equation and sufficient predictive capabilities can generally tell you where torpedoes will be coming from anyways. This goes double for if your target is a Russian or USN DD, since you're probably trying to flush them out of smoke or something, and they were probably more focused on their gun usage, making torpedoes somewhat less of a threat.

 

At the end of the day, though, having a combination of both is by far the best thing you can get if you're really keen on killing the small tin cans.

Edited by Rion12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
267 posts
4,277 battles

I prefer Hydro, especially german Hydro is extremely potent.

 

Radar is a offensive and situational skill

 

Hydro can be used offensively and defensively and is a lot less situational through it's longer duration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
520
[-FBS-]
Members
2,646 posts
4,290 battles

German? Hydro. Range is so good.

USN? Radar. Duration is really good.

Russian? ... Either? Radar has good range but low duration. They usually can actually hit DD's though because of their usually good shell velocity. Hydro is meh but way longer duration. 

 

Edited by saagri

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
808 posts
9,436 battles

I actually like Hydro when hunting DD's because as mentioned above hydro lets me see the torps earlier.  Radar is fantastic when there are enemy ships hiding behind islands or in smoke and your friendly cruiser lights them up for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,616
[-K-]
[-K-]
Members
6,122 posts
29,420 battles

If you're looking for a ship, use radar. If you're looking for torpedoes, use hydro.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
1,529 posts
1,148 battles

I would take radar any day over hydro. I'm not too worried about torps, more worried about killing the little ba$[edited]launching them. I take great joy in killing DDs, and I've gotten decent enough at dodging their torps that I don't feel a need to use hydro.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×