Jump to content
Forum Shutdown - July 28, 2023 Read more... ×
Forum Shutdown - July 28, 2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
awildseaking

Please Remove 2v2 CV Battles for T6/T7

8 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,305
[BOTES]
Members
2,409 posts
10,992 battles

I'm tired of getting 2v2s in my T6 CVs because of the Saipan. The Saipan is balanced, but that's not my problem. Paid players who are terrible at or new to the game are able to buy the Saipan and play T7 CV. Unlike all the other ship classes, having a bad teammate CV is an instant loss for you. Maybe your team can still win, but you won't be playing long in a 1v2 CV match, especially not if you're T6. CVs aren't like other ships where you can outplay opponents who have superior numbers. Normally, I don't believe that people should be punished for being bad at the game. Everyone has to start somewhere and we were all bad at some point. However, terrible Saipan players can end your game as a CV before it even starts and I have no recourse against these players because they didn't technically do anything wrong. T6 is already a nightmare since you regularly face T8 AA, but bot-tier Saipan players are part of the reason nobody plays CV anymore. Also, you really shouldn't allow new players to play high tier premiums. Having a bad CA won't end your game, but an awful Saipan is the worst. As a rule of thumb, perhaps you shouldn't be able to play a premium until you've reached that tier with one of the ships in the same class, or at least until you've started that class tree. Seriously, there are garbage Saipan players ruining games who haven't even started Langley or Houshou yet.

Edited by awildseaking

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,798
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
30,523 posts
6,337 battles

I get the point of what you're trying to say, but good god PARAGRAPHS! All that is to most, is a big damn blob of word vomit.

 

Break it up for god sake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
553 posts
8,586 battles

Think of it like this: that "bad" Saipan player has the same chance of being on the other team, so you're just "unlucky" to have gotten him on your team. At the same time, you could get a unicum Saipan player on your team to help you gain air superiority and more easily give your planes time to strike without having to worry. But, he could also be on the enemy team.

 

Not so bad now eh? Sure you might have bad games, but no one remembers those; we all remember the good ones!

 

Edit: btw Talon, OP's post is the length of a paragraph, if not, less than the length of a common paragraph. It took me 1 minute to read, and if you're intimidated by THAT, then...well...

 

Edited by SubTender_Taigei
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
529
[WOLF5]
Members
864 posts
11,081 battles

So what you're asking that WG stop selling premium ships to all the new players which happens to be their biggest source of income?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,305
[BOTES]
Members
2,409 posts
10,992 battles

So what you're asking that WG stop selling premium ships to all the new players which happens to be their biggest source of income?

 

No, that's why I specifically said not be allowed to play them. You can still buy whatever you want, but if you're only going to play ~10 games with a high tier prem and never play the actual line or learn the mechanics of the game, you may as well be griefing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,581
[GWG]
Alpha Tester
29,468 posts
15,906 battles

Think of it like this: that "bad" Saipan player has the same chance of being on the other team, so you're just "unlucky" to have gotten him on your team. At the same time, you could get a unicum Saipan player on your team to help you gain air superiority and more easily give your planes time to strike without having to worry. But, he could also be on the enemy team.

 

Not so bad now eh? Sure you might have bad games, but no one remembers those; we all remember the good ones!

 

Edit: btw Talon, OP's post is the length of a paragraph, if not, less than the length of a common paragraph. It took me 1 minute to read, and if you're intimidated by THAT, then...well...

 

 

It is A paragraph but should be two or three for readability.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
553 posts
8,586 battles

 

It is A paragraph but should be two or three for readability.

 

I can read it just fine. So can you. So can Talon. Splitting up something suddenly doesn't just make it "readable". It is 100% readable in its current state. I suggest you look back on your definition for "readability". After all, we all have access to the Internet, so no excuses. Oh, and don't use urban dictionary, they give the wrong definitions for everything.

 

:sceptic:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,815
[-KIA-]
Members
5,245 posts
17,322 battles

Consider the AA capacities of most ships at this tier, pretty much all of them can defeat several squads of planes alone or at least with defensive AA.  Yes there are exceptions but the majority are able to defend themselves against one CV, two CVs are sometimes needed to make a dent in a well organized fleet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×