Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'what-if'.
Found 4 results
I watch a lot of Russian cartoons because they align with my interests and...well, I ran out of American stuff to watch. Anyways, one is called Gerand, and a recent episode called "Iron Domination" shows what I believe is a Varyag? Now, the ship does have some differences from in-game Varyag. There are numerous AA guns on the forecastle & sterncastle, something many Varyag players wish they had. The ship also has 3 masts, a main gun directly in the bow, and lacks the unshielded guns found on in-game Varyag. What still makes me think this is Varyag is this episode came out around the same time Wargaming's Varyag history lesson did. My guess for the differences is that this is a hypothetical interwar refit of the ship. Note that she("he" in Gerand)still flies the flag of Imperial Russia, in this cartoon's continuity Russia actually GOT KICKED OUT from the Soviet Union but the factions have put off their impending war to fight common allies. Also in the picture are some BK-472 patrol boats. The Russian forces fight the Kriegsmarine fleet, made up mostly of FluSi flak boats but led by what is undeniably KMS Hermelin. They also have what appears to be a Type IIC U-boat with a 105mm gun stuck on it for some reason. Unfortunately, that poor U-boat has caught the attention of the Russian mega-sub Delfin. This thing is MASSIVE. The tallest tower on the deck is of comparable height to Fuso's pagoda. The "small" trapezoidal shape at the front of the ship? That's the bridge, large enough to hold the Tsar Tank. Those external torpedoes are 100-knot NUKES, and the Delfin also has internal torps. Wargaming Tier 200 when? The Imperial Russian Navy is being supported by a mixture of Yakovlev-1Bs, Lavochkin-5s, and Lend-Lease Airacobras. In turn, these fighters are escorting whatever the THIS is:
Battlecruiser_Yavuz posted a topic in Battleship EraHello! I thought this would be an interesting question. If it was already asked already, feel free to close the thread. A big factor concerning the Second World War was the Marine Nationale. Aside from a few skirmishes and battles here and there, they were mostly a non-factor in the entire conflict, neither supporting the Allies or Axis in large offensives. Nevertheless, they could've been a big tipping point prior to the massive scuttling in Toulon due to their relatively big numbers and good technology. While we can conclude that a full-on Allied Marine Nationale would've helped end the war faster, at least on the high seas, what about a fully loyal Axis Marine Nationale? What I mean is a Marine Nationale that is fully committed to the Axis cause. While that would definitely not work from a historical and political perspective, I'm mostly looking at this from a military perspective, so that is ignoring politics overall. While I'm also aware that the French had naval assets in the Pacific as well, I recall that they were very limited, so they probably wouldn't have too much of an effect on the war there. That is why I'm focusing on the Atlantic and Mediterranean theaters since the French Navy was very big in those sectors. XX For this question, I was either thinking around the time of France's formal surrender, which led to the creation of the Vichy French regime. Ignoring De Gaulle and the French French movement, lets just say that they have no naval assets and the French navy is mostly 100% fine with formally helping the Axis. If the Marine Nationale joined the Axis with French personnel and material, how would've that affected the British Royal Navy in terms of planning and logistics, especially if the French were working alongside the German and Italian navies in their operations? How would've that affected American planning when the United States Navy inevitably join the war effort after Pearl Harbor since they did have units in the Atlantic? Could the Axis overpower the Allies in Europe with the Marine Nationale on their side? If the war is won by the Allies, what do you think would be the fate of the Marine Nationale? After all, the Axis navies post-war were dissolved and their more important units were split up among the winners...with some small exceptions (i.e. the Andrea Doria-class battleships staying with Italy).
Battlecruiser_Yavuz posted a topic in Historical Discussions and StudiesHello! I always thought this was an interesting question. Aircraft carriers were frankly the game-changer for the big battleship-on-battleship engagements that dominated naval doctrine for years. They can send ordinance from the sky to eliminate heavily-armored warships without too many casualties to the attacker. While aircraft carriers were somewhat used in World War I by the British (HMS Ark Royal and HMS Furious), they didn't really hit their stride until World War II with Taranto, the destruction of HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse, Pearl Harbor, Coral Sea, Midway and more. XX My question is this: If aircraft carriers were more heavily explored in WW1 (i.e. They were used more in engagements and had their equivalent testing battles...like a bombing of the German High Seas Fleet with British carrier planes. This is just a random example of perhaps a demonstration of good carrier aviation that could happen in a what-if WW1), how would've that affected WW2 naval battles? Under this, there are a few more questions: -How would've technology advanced with the rise of carriers from the prior war (i.e. rise in missile technology to destroy carriers? Better planes to avoid carrier AA fire?) -What mistakes do you think naval commanders would make with carriers in the beginning stages of the conflict? -How would that affect building strategy and the naval treaties during the interwar period? -Would some warships have been prioritized over others (i.e. more carriers vs the Yamato-class battleships for the Japanese? Graf Zeppelin-like carriers over Bismarcks?) XX Feel free to get creative with your answers and expand upon your own lines of observation. Thanks!
Battlecruiser_Yavuz posted a topic in Battleship EraHello! I thought this was an interesting question to pose to the community. As you guys know, the scuttling of the German High Seas Fleet at Scapa Flow was a great event in the waning hours of the First World War that eliminated a lot of warships. These ranged from little destroyers to grand battleships. For historical conjecture (I doubt this would've happened in real life), let's say that the Germans was allowed to maintain the ships that were heading to Scapa Flow in a disarmed state. Let's also say that the Nazi Party rises like it did in our timeline, but their new Kriegsmarine is bolstered by all of this old German equipment. If you were a German admiral looking at this fleet, what would you do with the ships? Would you scrap them all to make room for more advanced designs or would you upgrade them to help bolster the surface fleet? Also, how would keeping this fleet have affected German naval development during the Second World War? Here is a link to all the ships that were sunk at Scapa Flow during the scuttling: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scuttling_of_the_German_fleet_in_Scapa_Flow#In_captivity Thanks!