Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'ranked battles'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • World of Warships - News and Information
    • News And Announcements
    • Updates and PTS
    • Developer's Corner
    • Community Volunteer Programs
  • Feedback and Support
    • Game Support and Bug Reporting
    • Player Feature and Gameplay Suggestions
    • Game Guides and Tutorials
  • General WoWs Discussion
    • General Game Discussion
    • Discussions about Warships
    • Player Modifications
  • Off Topic
    • Historical Discussions and Studies
    • Off-Topic
  • International Forums
    • Foro en Español
    • Fórum Brasileiro

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Discord


Twitter


Website URL


Instagram


YouTube


Twitch


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 13 results

  1. I tired a few things at first, but Jutland ended up being my go to. She is pretty good at going after other DDs, she has the rapid reload smokes, and its a lot easier to torp bow in BBs with her since her torps can be fired in singles. IDK how she worked so well for me, considering I am NOT a DD main, but hey, I can finally play T10 ranked which was my main goal this weekend.
  2. Can you make it possible for players to select which server they want to play ranked battles on like is done with clan battles? My account is on the NA server however I'm in SEA. As such the time ranked battles are carried out is kinda bad for me as ranked prime time is my sleep time. Can we have the same setup for ranked which we have in clan battles in which you can choose which server you want to play on before hand? I can't participate in ranked battles much simply because of the time difference. In Clan Battles, players can choose which server times they want to play on and then play on that server. Can we have the same system for ranked?
  3. I'm quite surprised to it casually says "ranked battles won't be available at night." I would think they wouldn't want to interfere with Clan Battles, but it isn't like CB is every night... beyond that, it just limits who can have access to ranked now - of course depending on how they define "night" Also surprised that "all" players go back to Bronze after the ranked season ends (mentioned around 3:30) - I thought one of the points of this was to allow players to find opponents of a similar level more often and easily. Lastly, looks like steel rewards are much lower now, though if these things are happening regularly and quickly perhaps it'll add up around the same. Any other thoughts or feedback? PS... Don't shoot the messenger! ;) BTW, here's the whole video - in case you missed the news: Also - Cherry Blossum returning? spotted around 5 min mark?
  4. admiralsexybeast

    FDR or Shikishima?

    So, as someone who has been a BB main since the beginning and also despises CVs, especially in competitive settings, I really can't believe that I'm contemplating this choice either. However, I'm mainly looking objectively at their potential in CB and ranked battles. When it comes to competitive modes, I'm more of a play to win than a play to have fun type of player. That being the case I tend to go for ships that trend well in those modes rather than what my "personal taste" wants. Also, I'm not a great CV player, however, I'm attracted to FDR because it seems to require very minimal skill and knowledge. I base this theory off my observations of it in game, as well as knowing that it has a massive number of planes in each squad and the HP of those planes is insane. Basically it appears that FDR can penetrate any AA bubble no matter how strong and get of 2 or more drops before having to break off due to the sheer number of planes and the HP they have compared to other T10 CVs. A clanmate of mine ran her and had great success at affecting the outcome of the game despite having little CV experience. It seems FDR's ability to affect the tide of the battle is borderline OP, especially in CBs and ranked, which is why I'm considering her over Shikishima. Now, as a BB main, Shikishima is more attractive to me on the surface by a longshot. However, from an objective standpoint, I really don't see her having nearly as much of a direct impact on the game compared to the FDR. I would really love having a Yamato hull with those huge guns, good aa, and secondaries. However, outside of those 3 things, she really doesn't have anything else going for her that Yamato doesn't already cover. Also, Yamato is one of my lesser liked t10 BBs, as I really don't like her lack of versatility compared to other t10 BBs. Since Shikishima plays more or less the same as Yamato, I really don't see myself enjoying her as much as I've enjoyed other T10 premium BBs like Bourgogne, Ohio, and Thunderer. In closing, my natural instinct as a BB main is to get Shikishima. She is within the class I play the most and perform the best in. Also, even though she will likely never be among my favorite BBs to play, I know I could still do well with her and not feel that I made a bad steel purchase. On the other hand, if FDR is really as game breaking and noob friendly as she appears to be, I think she could serve me well in competitive settings. As I said her planes appear to be literal juggernauts that charge in and do massive damage no matter how intense the AA fire and typically have plenty of HP to spare for a follow up attack or 2 before having to break off. Which one would you all get?
  5. Can someone explain to me how the scoring works in ranked battles? How does 145k damage, 2 ships destroyed, and 2 devastating strike achievements end up being ranked lower than 1 ship destroyed and no achievements? Not sure what more I need to do to save my star.
  6. Hi Wargaming... I have a suggestion. I believe it would be very cool if there was a combat mission available for ranked seasons: Play 100 battles of ranked or Achieve rank 1 The reward could be 7 days premium and/or doubloons or even a permanent camo for whatever tier the ranked season is played and it could be linked to any ship. I think such a reward would be nice considering the frustration players encounter and how many players avoid ranked altogether because of it. With such a reward people might decide to participate more. Oh... and.... -Remove the star saves (more incentive for winning over saving yourself) -Make rank 5 irrevocable (reduce the sheer aggravation of garbage teams) Thanks for reading.
  7. The_Pig_of_PIGs

    Ranked vs Random

    Goltzstadt finds Ranked more interesting than Random, essentially because there is much more team playing, winning the battle is the reward rather than farming damage. Why there are no Ranked battles permanently, different tiers, etc I can understand Clan battles happening during specific hours, but Ranked? No up or down tiers, more team play, etc Could be monthly, 2 different tiers, one odd, one pair (CVs and SSs, no CVs and no SSs).
  8. AdmiralOthuyeg

    Ranking out party, join in.

    The title says it. This is the thread where you can have cake and party when you rank out. Also, name your main ship. For me it was the Shinonome.
  9. Rank Battle Issues – No One Wants to Talk About Rank Battles is advertised as the Best Players and Best Boats battle it out to see who is “Top Dog”. Well Can anyone honestly say that's what is happening this season? Lets review the issues and the facts. Issues - 1 “Rental Ship”. Why its bad. In order to get a tier 10 Battleship, I had to grind my BB up to level 10. That means I know the strength and weakness of not only my but the other ships class/nationalities and their characteristics. Those that don't are a terrible disadvantage. It got so bad teams were regularly counting who had the most rentals, as it generally resulted in a loss. 2 Match Maker(MM) is out of control. I run a large fleet and have a variety of top tier ships and top tier commanders. In its zeal to make every game balanced even in ranked, it makes decision based on players ability(win percentages, total battles played, etc), ships ability(upgrades, consumables, and Commander skill points allocated). Thru the ability of rating each ship mathematically and the power of averaging, the MM Algorithm can theoretically balances the teams out. In Practical Use/Application not so much. Ranks is not Random Battles(where WoWs can place house Botz in here or there and get away with it).This can be proven by running a simple test of 10 matches. Run the same ship with a 10 pnt commander vs. a 19 pnt commander and notice the quality of team mates you are paired up with. You want to win don't run high level commander. MM will neutralize your advantages in the name of Fairness. 3 Game Balance. CVs are out of control. Since the Great CV Nerf of v8.x all in the name of FPS, the balance is off the scales. The primary reason the lack of Fleet Fighter Cap Role, which is a Design Error and a game flaw of Moronic Proportions. After all why do CVs carry fighters? For Rockets … LOL. 4 Game Balance . DDs When I read the Ships overview for DDs, it say one of there roles is to smoke the fleet. Why smoke has been Nerfed to the point where its virtually ineffective. No point in smoking the BBs and CAs for the most part are not much better. 5 Economics at Tier 10 in Ranks and Random are Broke. If you score 1,400 plus on a winning team how the hell do you loose 60k in credits in a ranked match. I know what I am seeing as I have 2.3k Ranked Battles and over 13k Random Battles under my belt. BTW the patch I wear indicates that I have been around since the Beta version of World of Warships. In short I know what I am seeing.
  10. The main reason I liked ranked battles is that fact you were playing specifically with other tier 5 opponents. Match maker was at it's best. The second reason I like the mini ranked battles is that rank 1 was obtainable by all players, and required only a reasonable amount of our time to achieve. Short and sweet, then it is over after you reached rank 1, but why did the ranked battles end after hitting ranked 1? The ranked battles should have continued to include an all inclusive only "rank 1 players" battles. Match Maker couldn't get much better than that. No loss or gain of rank, just a good ole time playing against players with equal ships and with less disparity of player's skills.
  11. USSPC_1264

    Ranked level 15

    I just got to level 15 in ranked for this season using my Cleveland, But now I need a level ten ship does this mean that this is as far as I can go for this season?
  12. I am not a very good DD player but I have tier 8 DDs and decided to give ranked another try. A few win/lose observations. Hey DD cap X and spot then help at Y. DD does so Caps X spots looks to Y and finds 5 friendlies fleeing 2 enemy and 2 friendlies far off vs 5 enemy at Z turn run and get sunk and all 7 crying for DD help. Loser move. Winner move though if enemy does that unless of course 2 or 3 friendlies chase them and get slaughtered! Hey DD cap X we will back you up. DD caps X Enemy is pushing X and 6 friendlies have scattered like roaches avoiding contact and staying away from caps X Y and Z. Loser move. Winner move if enemy does it. Then of course friendlies pursue and get slaughtered while demanding DD cap X Y and Z. Wake up guys stay together, focus enemy down 1 by 1 and Cap instead of chasing runners. Got 2 caps Defend them don't go for 3 and don't chase runners focus fire on them 1 at a time!
  13. anonym_djv4ZCNmZ56F

    Ranked battles is a blast!

    I just wanted to say thanks to everyone who I've played with in ranked so far. There's been almost no saltiness, far less than random battles, and the quality of play is better than random battles. All the DDs scout, all the cruisers support, and BBs push up. There are exceptions, of course, but for the most part everyone is playing their best. Maybe I've just been lucky in teammates this weekend, but its been a very good experience so far. Making me a better player, too.
×