Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'observations'.
Found 1 result
Does anyone else ever wonder why the majority of players are rated as "bad"? Seems to me that the rating need tweaking. Somewhere in that pool of "badness" between a PR of 0 to 750 is the truly average player. And by average I mean that the vast majority of players in Random games are not even rated "average". I think that raises a credibility problem for the ratings system, IMHO. Typically, matches look like this ss. The actual avg PR in this match (drastically influenced by one stratospheric player PR) is only 873. I appreciate the views of the community in this regard. And yes, I know that there is historical data on the server to "justify" the ratings system. On the ground, it doesn't seem to bear out the reality I see playing T3 every day.