Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'khabarovsk'.
Found 7 results
-
It was my understanding that if I researched Khabarovsk but did not actually purchase her that she would land in my port for free after the latest patch. (11.0) For good measure I also researched but did not purchase F Schulz. The patch is now installed and I am running 11.0 and no ships. Also, supposedly, Agincourt is supposed to be available for doubloons in the Armory as of the 11.0 patch? According to SLM on youtube? I don't see her in my armory for doubloons or anything else for that matter. What am I missing? Thank you, Jason
-
Will I still get free Khabarovsk if I reset the branch in Update 0.10.10
_EastWind posted a topic in General Game Discussion
We know that Khabarovsk destroyer will become a coal ship in Update 0.10.10. See the source below. I was wondering if I will still get free Khabarovsk in my account, after I reset the branch (so Khabarovsk become NOT researched again). Let's say I researched the entire branch, including Khabarovsk in the past and decided to reset reset the branch for the research points. Now I researched Minsk (T7 ship in the branch) and all the subsequent ships remain NOT researched. Will I still get Khabarovsk in Update 0.10.10? It seems so according to the following statement from the source. But still wanted to double check. Khabarovsk will remain on the accounts of its owners. If the ship was researched but not bought, sold, or the branch was reset, she will be invoiced to the player's account. Thanks all for your info in advance! Happy hunting! Source: UPDATE 0.10.10, DESTROYER DELNY AND CHANGES IN USSR TECH TREE https://blog.worldofwarships.com/blog/221 -
bringkhabarovskback! Khabarosvk, the power crept DD
magicalmoonman posted a topic in Player Feature and Gameplay Suggestions
Since the whole thing about the Russian cruiser lines are being changed/split, I feel like now is a good time to ask WG when they are going to revisit the little devil Khabarovsk? That ship in the current meta is piss poor. You have ships like Kleber that have 8 kilometer torpedoes and go to nearly 60 knots and then you have ships like Smolensk that can spam you to death with 16x 130mm guns. What about the Khabarovsk? The ship has only 6 kilometer torps with a speed of 43 knots. Khabarovsk's max speed without flags is 43 knots as well as her max range being only around 13.5 kilometers being a full gun boat build. Yes the ship has good armor, but the cost is, is that you still get the old pin values of DDs when shot by AP! The ship was buffed awhile ago and to be turned into stats that made sense at the time. Khabarovsk's current form was good for a time where their were less variety of ships provided by War Gaming. Back then at around 2017 (estimated) you didn't have ships like Venezia, Henri, Kleber, and Worcester. Not to mention any new BBs that have entered the game and the recent CV changes! Since these ships and changes have been brought into the game, the role of Khabarovsk has been demoralizing and not fun to play. Khab has also been over taken by the other DD, Kleber which has better detection, speed, and torps. Yes Khab can equip a heal but why would you choose a heal when you can't dodge shells that will go around 900 meters per second from multiple different type of ships? You also have to deal with the variety of DDs that you face like Harugumo and Daring that have good guns and way better than your concealment which is 9.7 kilometers. Khabarovsk used to have 8 kilometer torps with a lower damage Alpha as well as greater range for her guns. Khabs torps helped get that damage needed to help regular players to break that 100k damage. Back then, when their were less ships to counter Khab from her past form, she was a very disgusting ship to deal with. Now with new varieties of ships, we Khab is now power crept in this current meta. And she needs to be re-looked into to get her back to being a ship that can be enjoyed and maybe considered for Clan Battles? The ship needs to have better range in torps and gun range. I feel the past form of the Khabarovsk can suffice to bringing this ship back from the grave. -
I'm looking for advice on my Tashkent, future Khaba captain. My current build is: https://worldofwarships.com/en/content/captains-skills/?skills=1,9,18,20,23,25&ship=Destroyer I'm relatively new to the game, and trying to improve as best I can. Any advice is appreciated.
-
Harugumo needs a counter called (un-nerfed) Khabarovsk
KSN posted a topic in General Game Discussion
I just watched this Flamu review of the Harugumo, and was left aghast that WGing is getting ready to release this thing without a proper counter (or so it seems). For any that played and remember the original Khabarovsk; at least to me, seeing this thing is like a slap in the face to Khaba. ... this is a much higher level of 'dakka dakka' than the Khaba was ever EVER guilty of... I seriously don't know what to say about how hypocritical this is (even as an Akizuki fan). Simply put, un-nerf the Khabarovsk to make it the counter to the coming Harugumo and Kitakaze.- 142 replies
-
- 21
-
-
-
-
-
- harugumo
- khabarovsk
- (and 1 more)
-
Any other Khab captains ready to get back to BBs that miss sometimes?
anonym_djv4ZCNmZ56F posted a topic in Russian Destroyers
In random, I get hit very rarely, even at under 11k. Heck, I've kited BBs from 8km in random before. In ranked, however, I'm getting hit from 15km away sometimes. And under 10km? Good night ladies! I've almost decided to stop shooting at montanas. That's a ticked back to port in no time. I've done okay against Conquerors and GKs by staying at Max range, but man, those friggin' montanas. They're killer. Any Khab captains having an easier time kiting the BBs? Are you willing to share tactics? -
Do Khabarovsk WR stats reflect recent nerfs?
anonym_djv4ZCNmZ56F posted a topic in Russian Destroyers
Clarification: I am not looking for Khaba buffs. She's a blast. I am, however, curious whether or not the stats I see on the WOWS statistics websites reflect the recent nerfs (and yes, I know there are buffs in there, too) or just take all Khaba info. For example, I've seen guys with 168 games in the ship with avg damage of 140k and top damage of 350k. I'm nowhere near that. Best damage is 159 and i've got about 250 battles in khab. avg is in the 50s. Also, I usually place in the top 50% of my team and it isnt unusual to get top 3 or 4. However all my khab stats are below the NA server average. I'm just wondering if there is a lot of old data from back when Khab was super OP and if that is skewing data mining sites making players with nerfed khabs look substandard. Thanks for any replies. Please, don't focus fire me about how strong the Khab is. Again, I'm not asking for buffs, just info. Thx.
