Jump to content

unseaworthy

Members
  • Content Сount

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    242
  • Clan

    [DRAC0]

Community Reputation

34 Neutral

About unseaworthy

  • Rank
    Seaman
  • Birthday 04/15/1970
  • Insignia
    [DRAC0]

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Eastern US
  • Interests
    computer gaming, database development and administration, game development, AI, mapmaking, game mods, military history, forum moderatoration

Recent Profile Visitors

74 profile views
  1. unseaworthy

    It's still a pretty game

    I have never seen a better looking game, or a game that has put such effort in bringing inanimate objects to life so successfully. The brilliance of the game mechanics is equally outstanding.
  2. unseaworthy

    Really MM? 14 DDs in a match.

    Who said it was anything else? Is that "an order"? I'm laughing, see?
  3. unseaworthy

    Really MM? 14 DDs in a match.

    @Palladia No, it wasn't Mikasa. I may have a screenshot of the game somewhere, but it was a battleship of the same tier as the rest of us (as was the DD).
  4. unseaworthy

    Really MM? 14 DDs in a match.

    In a recent PT game, the symmetrical matchmaking included 2 cruisers on both teams. The third ship on one side was a DD, and the other side had a BB. I guess they are roughly equivalent...
  5. unseaworthy

    Really MM? 14 DDs in a match.

    My son was surprised to see 6 DDs in a game recently. We've seen a lot of 5 DD games lately and many fewer 3 CV games which is a relief since he plays mostly T3. But 6 DDs is a lot - good thing 0 CVs in this one!
  6. unseaworthy

    Exit Game

    I don't know if we ever crossed paths, but I regret that we will not share a game at some point in the future. We need players or else there is no game. Hopefully the marketing folks at WG will work their magic. I'd miss it.
  7. unseaworthy

    Why are Detonations still a thing?

    You are entitled to your opinion, of course. in MY opinion, the details of the Barnham's and Arizona's destruction are not so important as the fact that many capital ships (as I note you did not care to mention by name or number) and others did explode suddenly and tragically both in combat situations and at anchor due to negligence as well as dumb luck/lucky hits. That chance existed in history, it exists in the game and if you don't like it, use Juliet Charlie signals!!!! At least there's a solution to this "problem" with the game!!!
  8. unseaworthy

    Why are Detonations still a thing?

    I actually sell back my Juliet-Charlie signal sets because I (almost) never use them. If it's a competitive situation, I may use them. Never in typical Random games. I figure a player who knows how to hit my citadel deserves to see me blow up! And it's nice when I get the same reward, of course. Part of the game, IMHO.
  9. unseaworthy

    CCs host new skill based MM via training rooms!?

    This is an idea whose time may have come. Most of my high tier friends spend their time complaining about "newbs" ruining their games because they don't know how to play. Most of my lower tier friends spend their time complaining about the tier levels 7-10 ruining the balance of play in their T3/T4/T5 games. Most of my mid tier friends complain about newbs and experts ruining their games. If WG can't/won't recognize the problem of having no handicapping system and unlimited play as long as players "own the ship" - then players may have to take matters into their own hands. It's perfectly feasible to organize and do this without any help from WG.
  10. unseaworthy

    Why are Detonations still a thing?

    No one "likes" it - that's for certain. The families of HMS Hood crew who died when Bismark penetrated her her magazine(s) on the third salvo didn't like it. Others who suffered the same fate include the HMS Barham, HMS Indefatigable, HMS Queen Mary, USS Arizona and several more in action during WWI & II. IJN Mutsu, Kawachi, HMS Vanguard and others exploded while at anchor due to fires that detonated the ships' magazines. It happened! I love the history of these ships, and detonations were part of the real-life history of vessels especially before more modern shipbuilding and anti-flash procedures were strictly implemented following the devastating losses at the Battle of Jutland. If you really hate it, there's a signal set for that!
  11. Of course WG owns the forum. It's a player's forum. I'm a serious WoWs player. I love the game, actually. This forum is so far from "lenient" compared to games I've played over the last 20 years, it's not even close... it's more like an iron fist.
  12. I also know that you're trolling my posts! Two can play at that game, wishbone! LoL
  13. Makes perfect sense. All discussion of censorship is automatically censored, and there is no redress for the community if something is "deemed non-constructive". That's a big stick with no accountability to anyone who plays your game!
  14. Are you talking to me? If so, you are making the same mistake that Klingon made - an incorrect assumption. No rules were broken by me, period. As I said, I wasn't even the author of the thread.
  15. Are you talking to me? If so, you are making the same mistake that Klingon made - an incorrect assumption. No rules were broken by me, period. As I said, I wasn't even the author of the thread.
×