Jump to content


  • Content Сount

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan


Community Reputation

1,882 Superb

About Admiral_Thrawn_1

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    In a Galaxy Galaxy Far Far Away
  • Interests
    Star Wars, WWI and WWII history, Anime, Chess.

Recent Profile Visitors

4,854 profile views
  1. Lol yes WOT puts test/ new tanks in live server, but those are easier to know stats of by checking real world tank books on them, then any in game changes will be relatively minor. Lol I sometimes have been accused by some players of “being a hacker” in tanks, but never banned because I am merely using real world historical tank info to know example where armor weak spots, ammo racks, engines, ect are located. So Moderators probably get good laugh over those reports since I follow the rules of the game. And anyone can look up the real world rank data and use that info to their advantage in WOT. And it’s obvious Wargaming uses a lot of histocal data as general guidelines in their tanks and ships. Although with WoWs it’s a little harder to take advantage of such info since Dispersion with Warships makes trying for weak spots a bit more difficult. Meanwhile in tanks you can hit a hatch or something at a fair distance with far greater precision..
  2. Admiral_Thrawn_1

    I can't afford free to play really..

    Yeah that is why I always keep nice reserve supply of credits banked from grinding credits in premium ships, I always assume that sometimes I may need to use ships that will drain my credits while using them. But if surplus credits have been saved up for that purpose, then your still coming out ahead.
  3. Admiral_Thrawn_1


    Would like to point out the that these diagram examples while correct in many cases, can be in correct depending on the armor profile of some ships. Since some ships even when angled can have weak rear armor resulting penetrations when bow angling is better off. And ironically some ships are better at kiting and bouncing hits with rear armor when bow armor has weak spots that would have allowed citadel penetration. So the point I am making is take the angling examples to heart, but be sure to check and see if the bow angling or stern angling could kill you on certain ships.
  4. Admiral_Thrawn_1

    I can't afford free to play really..

    Actually not entirely true, you left out premium ships, freely given economic Camos, credit earning signal flags, and cost reduction signal flags. You can easily take a premium ship out to pile up the credits, then you are free to use any high tier ship you wish.
  5. Admiral_Thrawn_1

    Swearing on Official Channel

    If you swear all the time when much better language is able to be used instead. Odds are you either have a dark side for any number of reasons that is good cause for people not to entirely trust you, or else your IQ is not all that high in which case once again you can’t be trusted as far. And let’s give a practical reason why swearing is bad idea. Let’s say your in the military in a bad situation with only a moment to get a message across and the dialogue goes like this “ Profanity, Profanity, profanity, profanity...”. You would have no idea if there was really a problem or how bad a situation really was. On the other hand if you drop the profanity you could give life saving instructions that are clearly understood. And that applies to a lot of things in life even gaming, like I was in a WOWs battle and a guy kept swearing like crazy periodically in the battle, and you never knew if he needed help, what he was doing, what enemy was doing, or if he simply had missed a shot or something.
  6. Admiral_Thrawn_1

    Is there a Flaw in US BBs?

    What ranges is this happening to you at? Because High tier you could be getting long range shells coming down through deck armor, or else you could be getting close eneough for their shell velocity to penetrate your armor.
  7. Admiral_Thrawn_1

    Swearing on Official Channel

    No they do not, and no it is not. Most people I know that are respectable individuals, you never hear any profanity from them.
  8. Admiral_Thrawn_1

    WoWS Mac Wrapper Bugs and Feedback Thread

    I am curious why when Wargaming can obviously write game code for iOS for their Blitz games and have Microsoft work with them as well. Why not get some people that know how to write game code for a WOWs PC!? If need been you can pull the programmers off of WOWs Blitz and put them into WOWs PC team since the ideas for WIWs Blitz are garbage, mainly because of the scale needed for naval battles so kind of a failed idea compared to tanks in the first place. So might as well put them to work elsewhere in Wargaming. And I realize the game is totally different from 2017 to now, but we were warning Wargaming of growing game bugs by the end of that year, and you guys waited until things totally failed before even considering the problem. So my point is you might have wanted to look back at when things were going wrong and cross reference things to find out as you progressed what might still be the issues. Things such as when server population was beyond certain levels your game would destabilize for example.
  9. Admiral_Thrawn_1

    Akatsuki Concealment Broke?

    In real life I am doing very well, but in game.... Well let’s just say I am at the mercy of Wargaming Russian Dev team to get their game fixed so my MAC can be able to play again. Really such a shame they allowed their game to fall into such disrepair despite many early warning signs it was happening.
  10. Admiral_Thrawn_1

    Akatsuki Concealment Broke?

    Yeah every once in a while I have suggested that Akatsuki needs at least a slight Concealment buff considering Fububi And Kagero get far better Concealment, as well as many other ships. Which makes using Akatsuki a little difficult at times. Despite being in the stealth torp IJN DD line, I typically have to play Akatsuki more as an a,Bush ship or as Gunboat DD.
  11. Admiral_Thrawn_1

    AA system is a joke

    Oh now there is an excellent idea! Lol
  12. Admiral_Thrawn_1

    WoWS Mac Wrapper Bugs and Feedback Thread

    Look at what you had back in very early 2017 when MAC users could play without issues. Your game flaws started around December of 2018 and then got progressively more noticeable until things finally failed altogether.
  13. And what happens if you are in an Atlanta in que and there are 50 Scharnhorsts in que? Put them all in 1 battle with your Atlanta? That is part of what MM has to deal with, is not perfectly balanced assortments of ships just sitting their waiting to be placed in a match. Instead the MM has to try and split up those 50 Scharnhorsts in the most balanced manner possible And as I pointed out the up to 20 minute battle times plus the average server population only complicates matters.
  14. Admiral_Thrawn_1

    An Open Letter to Wargaimng

    Yeah back in December of 2017 I think it was. Returning players would receive either Guillio Ceasar or the tier IV IJN Premium BB. i ended up with the IJN ship. And despite claims of GC being OP, I never have had unreasonable trouble sinking GC with tier IV and V ships, and naturally even less trouble in tiers 6-7.
  15. Yes I read your message, but even if players did want that MM and even if it was tested, the results are already known. The Que times would rise up to unacceptable levels. Even WOT Blitz they had to use -2/+2 MM for first couple years or so despite the factors in favor of -1/+1 built into that game. We will need significantly higher player population 24/7 in WOWs before Wargaming could even consider bringing -1/+1 MM to WOWs.