Jump to content

HQ_21

Members
  • Content Сount

    166
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    8409
  • Clan

    [HIT]

Community Reputation

90 Good

About HQ_21

  • Rank
    Chief Petty Officer
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

765 profile views
  1. Cue the queue dump dip [edited].
  2. For [edited] and giggles let's go ahead and break down the absolute stupidity in your post. 1) Notser , iChase and other CCs did give the rework a chance. Even people like Flammu were at worst cautiously optimistic about it. 2) In any case, not even close to "everyone" even watches CC vids/streams. So your theory of player expectations is something you pulled out your [edited]. 3) Any prophecy that it would suck came true because it DID suck. Unless of course you're a brain-dead half-wit that was looking for some super OP ship to play so you can exclaim "Yaaayy! Look it how 1337 I am now! Yay!" To that type of window licker, sure it didn't suck. 4) If you weren't so stupid as to be swayed by the likes of Notser and iChase as to the whether the rework was good or not, then I guarantee almost no one else would be either. So no, Notser and others are not responsible for the trainwreck that ANYONE WITH HALF A BRAIN could've seen coming and then experienced FOR THEMSELVES. Oh, look at that. Your stats are hidden. What a [edited]surprise you thought the first iteration of the rework was ever a good thing.
  3. HQ_21

    USS Missouri

    IDGAF what they say. WG’s credibility is almost nonexistent. It was pulled for its ability to make credits a non-issue even for non-premium users.
  4. HQ_21

    Premium Ship Review: Dunkerque

    Not that I’m aware of. I believe this ship ends up on sale a fair amount of time though.
  5. HQ_21

    Premium Ship Review: Dunkerque

    Buy it after the “loaner” has been returned.
  6. That part was obvious, as you’re showing, it’s right on the credits/XP page. The first page anyone should look at when they see such a high amount of credits awarded. The amount of damage done is certainly plausible in a normal Random Battle. But the bot names are rather easy to notice too.
  7. Yeah that’s always interesting. Been so long since I played there they sent me an email offering 5 million credits, some containers and a free Scharnhorst!
  8. You guys are dense. It’s a protected MM game with bots on a re-roll account.
  9. HQ_21

    Anniversary Stream Giveaway Link

    Cannot redeem WG code due to technical issues.
  10. HQ_21

    2 T-10 CVin full T-10 matches again

    So, pissing off a handful of people at off hours is SO much worse than pissing off a helluva lot more people with multiple CV games. Mhmm kaykay shillboy.
  11. HQ_21

    2 T-10 CVin full T-10 matches again

    Yeah? Really? At T8 or 10? At like what? 4:00 AM ET once in a while? So [edited]what. I've seen 3CV on 6 ship teams at T4. That's [edited]stupid. If T2 ships have to deal with 2v2 and even 1v1, then CVs can deal with the same fighting each other and no one else.
  12. HQ_21

    2 T-10 CVin full T-10 matches again

    Yeah, no they wouldn’t. Seriously, you give the lamest excuses for every stupid thing WG does.
  13. HQ_21

    WG`s fix for uptiering .....?

    Bingo. But the WG buttbois will defend a needlessly convoluted solution when there’s a better, easier solution staring them in the face.
  14. Yeah, don't hold your breath on that. The whole "support role" thing was just something to have an answer for when asked "what happened to odd-tier CVs?". I doubt they had any serious ideas of what they were going to do and didn't want to give an honest answer to the question. Just like CVs in PvE and wholly inadequate testing, the odd-tier CVs were a victim of the ridiculously rushed nature of this rework. Something they'd never admit and looking all the more ridiculous after they did next to nothing to fix CVs during their self-proclaimed "Year of the Carrier".
  15. You should read his whole post and then learn the meaning of "context". In the meantime, fire your tutor.
×