Jump to content

_WaveRider_

Members
  • Content Сount

    3,330
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan

    [USCC2]

Community Reputation

638 Excellent

1 Follower

About _WaveRider_

  • Rank
    Commander
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    UK

Recent Profile Visitors

1,926 profile views
  1. I would love to chant the mantra 'adapt and overcome', as it seems to be what is said by so many when a negative change is made to other ships. However, this will never happen as it makes no sense for WG to make it happen. The majority of players play the big ships - big is powerful, big is forgiving, big does good damage and good damage reaps rewards. Is WG really going to annoy half its player base? I doubt it.
  2. _WaveRider_

    I grinded for Shimakaze...Now I am quitting

    I'd already edited my reply.
  3. _WaveRider_

    I grinded for Shimakaze...Now I am quitting

    So balancing would lead to breaking the game? I would disagree, but I would agree that having the smallest ships in game doing the same damage as the bigger ships in this 'war game' (even if it was all down to skill), would have most bigger ship captains losing their Shizzle lol That wouldn't be good for profits and therefore not good for the game - WG need to keep the majority happy and the majority play big ships. Makes complete sense. Edit: Ok, I get it - if the wants of the forum were acted upon it would break the game; got it. Sometimes thinking can really hurt me lol.
  4. _WaveRider_

    I grinded for Shimakaze...Now I am quitting

    Apologies again as you were mentioning there was no counter, to which I said that is like saying there is no counter to radar. You then said running away is not a counter and I thought you meant radar, but you said no. You then say running is a good counter measure in your post I'm replying to. I'm also playing the game atm, so it's probably me just not catching your meaning.
  5. _WaveRider_

    I grinded for Shimakaze...Now I am quitting

    Not quite sure why I laughed at that one.
  6. _WaveRider_

    I grinded for Shimakaze...Now I am quitting

    Why if a ship is consistently performing badly would you not be serious in making it more balanced? Your choice of course. Win rate is subjective as I expect the khab to have a good win rate because it is most likely to survive over the other DDs (or at least the stats showed that); that does not mean that it had an excellent game or came top, just that it survived better than the other DDs so was on the winning side. I would also like to see a rebalance, because I don't believe it's balanced at the moment but favours damage more. When you re-write the game mechanics to focus a particular ship type to a particular role then the game economy rewards would benefit from a change to (only to the point where earnings are generally equal; I just don't think it's quite there atm). Yes, it's completely workable as any player can play any ship, but why not look at a general balance in game? (IMO)
  7. _WaveRider_

    I grinded for Shimakaze...Now I am quitting

    So you ran away from the khab?
  8. _WaveRider_

    I grinded for Shimakaze...Now I am quitting

    If they need their concealment buffed then go ahead (if their survival is poor; what do the stats show?) (You do realise buffing concealment doesn't affect how well you spot don't you? It will allow you to get closer, but it's all about the distance my friend )
  9. _WaveRider_

    I grinded for Shimakaze...Now I am quitting

    Why run away from radar? Use the map, use the land for cover, have an escape route planned, get team mates to attack the radar ship. All these are counters to dying to radar (I guess you can just run away too!).
  10. _WaveRider_

    I grinded for Shimakaze...Now I am quitting

    No good counter play lol. That's like saying there is no counter play to radar, of course there is counter play.
  11. _WaveRider_

    I grinded for Shimakaze...Now I am quitting

    Again I disagree. Any player should do what they can to contribute to the team win. If that means that when I am in a DD I can kill easier than cap, then I will do it. Surely you can see that?
  12. _WaveRider_

    I grinded for Shimakaze...Now I am quitting

    Lol the overdramatization thing again then. Got to say that this general topic hasn't really degraded into a slinging match though; we might disagree on some things but that's life.
  13. _WaveRider_

    I grinded for Shimakaze...Now I am quitting

    They were removed because they consistently got the best stats across the board I would assume(?) The very reason if any ship type is underperforming in certain areas I would hope they would be rebalanced; or does it not work both ways?
  14. _WaveRider_

    I grinded for Shimakaze...Now I am quitting

    I certainly do better with spot X ships lol, that's the one thing I can count on. Although I have to say I have probably had several caps in my cruisers and Battleships once the DDs are dead, capping is definitely not a DD only thing lol.
  15. _WaveRider_

    I grinded for Shimakaze...Now I am quitting

    A simplified viewpoint (no insult intended). Every player should play to the ship strength and assist the team with winning. In most cases this means spotting, but not necessarily above all else, there is capping and killing. To try and say things must be done in a particular order is what causes many problems. Some BBs are suppose to be brawlers and offer close support, some are better a little further out (I'm not saying the map edge lol). But to say any ship type 'must' do a particular thing is what often causes games to go south (DD do this, BB do this etc).
×