Jump to content

TheSeventhSeeker

Members
  • Content Сount

    298
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    39

Community Reputation

67 Good

4 Followers

About TheSeventhSeeker

  • Rank
    Master Chief Petty Officer
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Doomheim [666]
  • Interests
    lods of emone, probly

Recent Profile Visitors

1,467 profile views
  1. TheSeventhSeeker

    A friendly reminder that...

    It is the year TWO THOUSAND and NINETEEN of our lord and unified free xp and gold are still officially postponed because of "technical problems".
  2. TheSeventhSeeker

    so this happened

    And there are matches with this many cruisers and this many battleships, what's the point?
  3. TheSeventhSeeker

    WGC update removed trollish acpects.

    And introduced other trollish aspects.
  4. TheSeventhSeeker

    Premium CV Refund

    The only way WG can regain my trust is to unify gold and free XP, as was promised before and up to OBT started.
  5. TheSeventhSeeker

    All personal record for killed ships past 5

    9 in the Marblehead followed by 8 in Hiryu. In CBT my highest was 8 but I have no clue what ship it was in because it doesn't show CBT stats per ship anymore.
  6. Someone should have told Gerald Bull that.
  7. TheSeventhSeeker

    Possible Solution to Radar

    It was actually pretty uncommon.
  8. TheSeventhSeeker

    Possible Solution to Radar

    A DD would not have to be permaspotted to suffer, 40 seconds is enough to outright kill a destroyer. Even if spotted and not damaged, DDs can suffer - IJN DDs for example work well if nobody knows where you are, if you've been spotted just once and everyone knows what general area you're in, they will be more vigilant, launch their scout plane, turn on hydro, etc. and your chance of scoring a hit will go down. It's one thing if you get spotted because of a misplay, it's another if you get spotted through 2 islands by a cruiser that you don't know is there. It's precisely because they're not really easy to play that WG gave them heals, DFAA, hydro, and radar. That was a mistake.
  9. TheSeventhSeeker

    Possible Solution to Radar

    It doesn't happen often because there are too many things that counter DDs and torpedoes in general, hydro, radar, planes hovering over DDs, planes spotting torpedoes, torpedoes being spotted permanently, etc.
  10. TheSeventhSeeker

    Possible Solution to Radar

    This is the central question, and the answer is because if they do, then they're bad. It's really that simple, if DDs can't maneuver around other ships without being spotted, they're not useful. Destroyers can work around radar, sure, but then you have to play more passively and more risk-averse, and that leads to lower performance in general. At this point, I'm beginning to think high tier cruisers are just "I win" buttons, because they already have 3 hardcounter consumables - DFAA, hydro, radar - plus heals, and some people still think they aren't good enough.
  11. TheSeventhSeeker

    Possible Solution to Radar

    t. baBBy who believes he should never have to be hit by a torpedo in his life give me a break
  12. TheSeventhSeeker

    Possible Solution to Radar

    My question is, why do cruisers need an offensive consumable that can cause the death of destroyers outright, and especially one that can see through hard cover? Concealment is the only thing that destroyers as a whole really have going for them, taking that away with radar is a complete nullification of the class.
  13. TheSeventhSeeker

    Possible Solution to Radar

    This was still around in CBT and it made sense, I don't know why they got rid of it.
  14. TheSeventhSeeker

    Possible Solution to Radar

    ))))) Perhaps, they might underperform less - certainly in the case of Gearing and Shimakaze.
  15. TheSeventhSeeker

    Possible Solution to Radar

    This is the role Hydro filled, and Hydro is only slightly less cancer because although it has less range, it can still see through hard cover like islands.
×