Jump to content

GenerallySpecific

Members
  • Content Сount

    44
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    24359
  • Clan

    [FU8AR]

Community Reputation

23 Neutral

About GenerallySpecific

Recent Profile Visitors

710 profile views
  1. So basically its been made more complicated and less "free", "easy", and "enjoyable" to play for our benefit.......more lame [edited]marketing
  2. GenerallySpecific

    Rogue Wave + Benham

    That would conflict with the sales plan and force players to improve their skillset...lol, much easier to buy the next premium to compete.
  3. GenerallySpecific

    Sinop is too good

    Just one example of Russian bias - T7 Sinop vs T7 California. Look at the dispersion of the MA - the Cali is the rebuilt 1944 version with the latest search and fire control radars yet the nonsense papership Sinop (with WW1 UK rifles and FC) is superior. Is that because Russian fire control was/is/will evel be better? Nope, just a convinient way to get people to play (mostly non-existent) OP Russian ships.
  4. GenerallySpecific

    Who will actually uninstall and quit?

    Players that uninstall and quit are the small percentage that base decisions on principles, not convenience or path of least resistance. WG definitely sucks, if there is no access for players voices to be heard, what does that tell you? A lower standard than all the other greedy corporations with the "if you don't like it piss off" mindset. The same mindset that currently gets you to login for free crap, then counts the login numbers as active players/playing. The only way to effect change is to quit, but don't hold your breath, missile armed soviet CVs are coming with a CEP out of this world. Also the next new line of ships will include Soviet missile boats with a marine contingent (which was their navy's main contribution to the war effort after all...lol). Can't wait ; ). Sinop has better accuracy than the Cali? Really? No bias here folks move along to the premium tab to adjust for this round of creepage.
  5. GenerallySpecific

    List of Departed CCs

    My sincerest respect to the CCs that decided that their principles outweigh the many despicable practices that WG seems wedded to. It is overdue that WG face the music that their rotten corporate minds dance to. I stopped spending money with them last year, and I encourage everyone to do the same. Try buying a simulation that isn't focused on bleeding you dry with lies, deceit, and predatory practices. Derping/nerfing/power creep/russian bias/ etc. the nonsense goes on and on... Reap what you sow ;)
  6. GenerallySpecific

    Submarines in Ranked and Co-op Battles

    Subs will just cement the yes sir CC community and divest what little realism (LOL) that WoWS ever had. Next will be SS-N-26s on russian aircraft carriers. Time to find a real game.
  7. Shallow troll topic, time to leave WoWS and play a realistic game with adults. B-Bye!
  8. GenerallySpecific

    feedback on the game in 2021

    Excellent post but WOWS doesn't seem to care what players think with the CC community consisting more and more of yes kids. New paper ship premiums one after another forcing players to pay to win - and with a Russian bias no less. Too bad they don't accurately depict the Soviet Navy ie. bad ships but good marines. T7 Sinop with more accurate rifles then the rebuilt California? What wishful thinking comrades.....
  9. GenerallySpecific

    This is the end.... Soviet CV's Announced

    Just what everyone has been waiting for...more OP paper Russian ships! Can't wait to see more game imbalance for a few weeks before the next round of premiums comes out to redress. Maybe I'll spend the next round stim check on them. Do they carry nukes? Oh wait, the second round of submarines should take care of that, just use the hybrid (high-bred) aircraft system, spoiler alert. Heaven forbid WOWS try and generate revenue with original or player based suggestions. BUT THEN THE DEVELOPER COMMUNITY SEEMS TO CONSIST OF MONKEYS WITH TYPEWRITERS....SO BE PATIENT THERE MUST BE A PONY!
  10. GenerallySpecific

    The real Russian CV we all know is coming!

    Just what everyone has been waiting for...more OP paper Russian ships! Can't wait to see more game imbalance for a few weeks before the next round of premiums comes out to redress. Maybe I'll spend the next round stim check on them. Do they carry nukes? Oh wait, the second round of submarines should take care of that, just use the hybrid (high-bred) aircraft system, spoiler alert. Heaven forbid WOWS try and generate revenue with original or player based suggestions.
  11. GenerallySpecific

    LEAKED! Russian CV line coming soon!

    Just what everyone has been waiting for...more OP paper Russian ships! Can't wait to see more game imbalance for a few weeks before the next round of premiums comes out to redress. Maybe I'll spend the next round stim check on them. Do they carry nukes? Oh wait, the second round of submarines should take care of that, just use the hybrid (high-bred) aircraft system, spoiler alert. Heaven forbid WOWS try and generate revenue with original or player based suggestions.
  12. GenerallySpecific

    California accuracy

    Cali has very bad accuracy, funny since her 1944 rebuild included FC radars. The paper ship Sinop has better accuracy (but its Russian). So a never was ship a decade older does better? No Russian bias here folks, just deposit money and move along.... And if any trolls don't like facts too bad.
  13. GenerallySpecific

    WOWS torps

    They were not single fire, actually deep water torps...so please take your comment and piss off.
  14. GenerallySpecific

    USS California

    So the 1944 rebuild of the Cali which included search and FC radars has crappier dispersion than the paper crapSinop from a decade earlier? No Russian bias to see here folks, just give us your money and move along......
  15. GenerallySpecific

    WOWS torps

    Once again those magic self-guided torps from bots that turn to follow your ship and actually crossed their own paths, whats next WG, Russian ships that don't suck?
×