Jump to content

gslick

Members
  • Content Сount

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan

    [WOLF7]

Community Reputation

5 Neutral

About gslick

  • Rank
    Seaman
  • Insignia
  1. For us 7v7 is difficult enough to populate most nights. I can only remember 2 times we had any reserve player. There is no good answer to satisfy everyone. Make the teams too big and smaller clans are frozen out, too small and large clans wonder why bother, and I feel that battles could become too uninteresting at smaller team sizes.
  2. Since they have experimented with a 5v5 in ranked "spring", I wonder if they should try a 5v5 clan battle to accommodate smaller clans like mine. (1 BB, 0 CV of course). The downside would be that might cause friction in larger clans due to more people being set on the bench so to speak.
  3. Going to 9v9 itself would reduce the number of clan battles played and increase the que time for battles. Significantly fewer battles and longer que in "my" opinion. For my clan we frequently do not have even 7 online at the right time, and other times have had to beg a tier 10 meta hater into being our 7th. I estimate that a 9v9 would reduce us from about 125 battles to less than 50 if any at all. Also, inclusion of CV may kill our participation in the 7v7 anyway. I might give it a try (not as CV myself) but if it is as toxic as seeing in random I will likely just be unavailable during clan battle times.
  4. gslick

    Premium Ship Review #121: Exeter

    Thank you. Weeelll, I guess since its WG after all, that is very possible.
  5. gslick

    Premium Ship Review #121: Exeter

    So, its just another screw up I guess. What is being tested or not tested? Is anyone minding the store?
  6. gslick

    Premium Ship Review #121: Exeter

    This is true, but if not thinking about an Exeter change of this nature, there would not be any reason to spend any time in testing this. And if its just a total screwup, I guess we should not be that surprised?
  7. gslick

    Premium Ship Review #121: Exeter

    https://www.wows-gamer-blog.com/2019/02/warships-of-interest-hms-exeter-68-Heavy-RN-Cruiser.html
  8. gslick

    Premium Ship Review #121: Exeter

    Exeter looks like is a top notch Gudboat if not slightly OP to me. The win rate stats so far (short time only) indicate as much. (If it ain`t winnin` I do not care). So, what the h*!! is WOWs hq thinking with adding smoke to it in patch 8.2 as per the gamer blog? Is that desperation due to slow sales (since I refused to purchase for hard cash after their self inflicted Cesar fiasco). Meanwhile, poor ole Emerald is still a sad excuse for a ship even with the recent buffs. Their (WGs) reasoning frequently completely eludes me.
  9. I am in the same "boat" as you. Would already have Wichita in my port already except for the threat of the nerf. Only a cash refund is satisfactory to open the spending gates again. In store credit is not valuable anymore.
  10. Unfortunately, I think you are correct Admiral. o7
  11. gslick

    Giulio Cesare not viable at Tier 6

    Shutting down my wallet is exactly what has happened for me. If a nerf is "absolutely" required of a purchased premium, then a return of my CASH investment is my requirement to ever consider buying a premium ship for real $$$ again. A refund of their play currency is a completely unsatisfactory solution. That would demonstrate that WG wishes to nerf for the health of the game, and it was not a scheme to convert my and others real money into play currency without our permission or knowledge.
  12. gslick

    Flags for credits! - finally!

    I completely agree with this.
  13. gslick

    Flags for credits! - finally!

    I totally agree on the excessive price for the flags. For example, if I play a battle in the Worcester with all premium consumables and 8 combat flags in order to maximize my effectiveness, it will cost me 994,500 credits before I fire a single shot. Would exceed 1 million credits except for the permanent camo's 50% (90,000 credit) service cost reduction. I often shake my head in disbelief on WG's in-game economies and their lack of any consistency.
  14. gslick

    If Giulio must be hit with a nerf--

    Wichita has sold a least one less than it would have before the threat to renege on previous assurances to not nerf premium ships. Needed it to fill out my USA heavy cruiser line (with Alaska to come) only needing one captain in the Pensacola and all the following tiers having premiums. Oh, well!! Refunding my real cash would ease my grief.
  15. WG does not buff premiums because I think it is underpowered. I bought a Krasny Krym, and although it is a very weak ship I have not felt abused nor demanded a refund. I tell clan members of its weakness so they may avoid purchasing. If it gets buffed I will be pleased but WG will buff it to entice future sales, not because I would like. However, to retroactively devalue my purchase is not acceptable. If balance ABSOLUTELY requires it, a CASH refund is in order, not further useless in game currency.
×