LowSpeed_US

Wait a minute here mister. Are you indirectly telling me to mount AFT? Using her like an Aigle?

Sims (MacGyver boat) Leningrad (it's silly fast) Okhotnik (oh the 'lols') Stay away from Blyskawica (aka "K" wagon). Needs major buff. Also, non regular nation with no tech tree.

I've been on the receiving end from 1 of those ships. It was absolutely impressive annoying to see your HP pool deplete like nobodys business. Off topic: I was on a DD, capping. Got spotted. Had no less than 4 different tracer shells from 3 different (3 red, 1 blue) directions. My FPS literally dropped 20+ frames (from average of 45). I died, I lent back, sat down, laughing at the pure light show.

On my NA account, yes. However she is so darn expensive to run. If you're short on credits like me. On my EU account, barely scraping the sea bed on my FIJI with a 5 point captain, with even lower credits. Oh, and they still are very susceptible to a salvo from other T10 canons.

Agreed. To add, I've started to avoid placing signals, camo recently to 'test' myself. But in reality, I barely have any. LOL

After a short break from WOWS. I've logged in, and via container I've gotten a super container. A T6 DD just in time for the Ranked Sprint, on NA account. On my EU account however...*insert nothing but silent farts*

hilarious! WG will inflict same thing when the tiers do get extended. Someone will post "can we have 14, 15, 16". *smilyfacelol*

I suspect, anyone and everyone who has the time and ability to reach T10 CV pre-"we will refund you with X mil credits after rework" will be playing CVs to reach said tier. If you think NA server is bad as you say it is. You should try playing on EU server, solo. The chat box might as well never existed. The very idea of teamwork via communication is non existent. I have yet to be proven wrong on this.

Congrats! any ship via SC is a win. I have yet to get one in my EU account circa account activation years back.

There is no doubt that sync dropping happens. There is also an odd choice of decisions made by the CV Captain to intentionally drive his CV into mid cap being out of the game 5 minutes in. The opposing team had a famous CV streamer/player/cc. Everyone in the teams knew our CV Captain, did it intentionally. Needless to say, we lost very quickly and ending with the said famous CV streamer/player with 4 kills. What I disliked was our CV player throwing the match. Nothing else.

Oh, I do not doubt that at all. I have yet to grind to that ship. However, using a 4 point captain skill just for the sake of having a somewhat effective AA for a DD is a wasted 4 expensive points. That is what I was leaning towards.

I raise you with Marblehead

Thanks, i'll check it out. edit: Upon having read it. As a non CV player, this change from my limited knowledge of 'news'. Will wean CV mains to quit or DD mains to rage.

I think the use of a heavy (expensive) 4 points on AFT for a DD just for the need to have AA is a totally wasted point. I do not believe that Destroyers are meant to be great at AA (if they are, they are limited). That 4 point could be better utilised elsewhere for a better use, rather than for AA only. I find whatever comes, that the crucial captain skill points are being yet again diluted (& forced) to be re-specc'd for the purpose of "just having an AA chance".

So, besides the 4 point AFT skill. What else does it require to be "properly specced"?