Elo_J_Fudpucker

Please send feedback up the line that maybe when they go for these major changes.. they should announce it up front and issue the above mentioned article before the update... this whole situation is typical of WG in that they do not communicate well, make decisions that upset the balance, and then have to play damage control...and it happens over and over again, putting you at the sharp end of their failure to think through what effect their changes will have on the user base. This situation is a good example of what we mean when we say WG doesn't seem to be well connected to the user base or the game itself.....

There are two Wargamings.. the one that is presented to us through the marketing staff, and the one behind the lines that we don't get much exposure to... the behind the lines staff does their thing, and it is then given to the marketing staff to .. errr.. ?promote?.. ?defend?... we see the pretty face of marketing, and they try hard to put the frosting on the bitter cake, and act as the protective harbor wall, taking the brunt of the the waves and not allow in more than a ripple to make it into the inner harbor... of course I am now real close to the line of criticizing WG, which just is not allowed... which in itself is part of the problem... ... of course this is all my own opinion...

Oooo ..well I guess you told me.... Hisssssssssss ;)

This is what happens when you posy anything that dares to criticize WG.. I just write it off as WG employees posing as forum posters. There is a caustically aggressive nature to this forum, where by anyone with thoughts is quickly driven off with bullying.. I assume this is how WG prefers it to be... they have told me there is no problem, as have the other "employees" ...

..and you are privy to their tax return .. how?

... why do people have to crap on others posts... you didn't add anything... you just mouth off... go away.. begone troll.

Exactly... ... it's a free game.. there is no incentive to learn for many I guess... to get capable, it takes a few thousands battles of applying oneself to learning... that is how it was.. ..now? .. it seems that that concept is out the window with captains just rushing to T10 and "being potato". It has reduced the quality of the game and of my enjoyment, but apparently it works for WG.

Exactly.. *they* see no benefit... what they just might want to consider, is what they people who would be paying customers want.. .now granted, one doesn't run a business, say a laundromat, as a public service.. you run it to make money, but when the customers ask iof the operators could put in a bigger TV, you do it, because it costs very little and makes them all happy... no one is asking for them to install a bar and movie theater... .. anywho... It is a WG world and it will be what it will be. :D

I have heard the "it's too complicated" excuse many times, from WG, and 'lo months/years later, the thing that was too complicated to do, appears. I doubt that it is thus with the MM... people want a better MM. WG should do it.

~ why there should be a skill gap check ~ Yeah.. good luck with that... not gunna happen... yes, it should happen... yes, there oughta be some sort of skill barriers... but yeah.. not gunna happen... WG isn't going to change anything and they are not going to change this.. yes, i makes the game less fun.. but this is how they want it..

16 cv 10 bb 10 cl 10 dd So.. why are there more CV than other craft in the queue now... ? CV take no skill to play, so naturally they are the choice for newer players.. kill easily, with no recourse... what's not to like... ( cue the hate posts and the boring emoticon)

Nope.. no advice.. no opinions.. actually pretty much anything you post other than praise will get attacked.. .. toxicity is the name of the game... when a post is made all efforts must be made to pick at it, find fault and then attack the poster for having the timidity to post in the first place... which is why many captains do not bother with these forums.. this is a "suck it up butter cup" kinda place.. you know like it is on the rest of the Internet.. nice try though... marks for that!

...good idea.. it'll never happen...and I hope am proven wrong.. see, if you give the user base a choice, they aren't going to want to fight against a CV... note last weekends invitational battle and the DRAW ... what made that battle so much fun to watch for me, and I surmise to fight in, was that there wasn't a CV involved, thus making for a more compelling competition.... but I do not think WG is not going to give us that choice.

There are no bots or cheats in WoWS.. WG has told you this.. why do you insist on disagreeing?

I have 150 ships... I am meh on all new ships and .. yeah . meh on the entire WG system.. so yeah.. new ships?.. I don't care.. they are in power creep mode, intentionally upping the anti to force people to spend money to stay competitive with the newer ships, but I'm not falling for that... I also suspect they do the same thing with ships that they are accused of doing with tanks.. when a new model comes out, it is very effective, but as it ages, it has it's parameters adjusted... Maybe I am wrong, but as WG has not instilled trust in what they do... I no longer trust them...