Jump to content

Battlecruiser_Repulse

Members
  • Content Сount

    7,086
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    7668
  • Clan

    [KNMSU]

Community Reputation

6,090 Superb

About Battlecruiser_Repulse

Profile Information

  • Location
    Puget Sound

Recent Profile Visitors

5,894 profile views
  1. Battlecruiser_Repulse

    Can we have a separate forum for CV complaints?

    There's no discussion to be had. The position of myself and many other players at this juncture is that carriers are a) an abusive mechanic favored by sadistic trolls, and b) there is no path forward for fun in the game with them present. There is no middle ground here, and I'm not arguing for any. The airports must go.
  2. Battlecruiser_Repulse

    Can we have a separate forum for CV complaints?

    You put this kind of cancer into the game; you get to deal with the permanent ramifications. Sorry, this isn't going away.
  3. Battlecruiser_Repulse

    By the end of 2020, CVs balanced will be solved... Here is how.

    You need to seriously reevaluate your life.
  4. Battlecruiser_Repulse

    Shinonome needs a buff

    That's really how I've always wanted to play my Shinonome - as a kind of baby Harekaze. But you can't do jack with that range.
  5. Battlecruiser_Repulse

    Shinonome needs a buff

    Turret traverse buff + 1km gun range would be better. Actually allowing her a bit more gunboat flexibility would be nice.
  6. Battlecruiser_Repulse

    [edited] to not release siegfried

    Presently it is a terrible, mis-tiered, mess of a ship. It always amazes me when the potatoes get so ramped up for a boat that pretty much every CC has written off as objectively bad, and act as if it's a personal problem and that they - of the sub-50 WR bracket - will unlock the secrets of the ship's performance. This is why Sub_Octavian and Wargaming continue to get away with charging you for, and releasing, broken, unfinished, or - in the case of Siegfried - poorly conceived boats: because you will nurse on that poisoned bottle no matter how many times we tell you its tainted.
  7. Lol. A large majority of people are impatient for submarines? Proof? Oh, wait - you have none.
  8. Ah, the Rant-o-bot X9000 appears to be back from repairs.
  9. Battlecruiser_Repulse

    Thank you Jingles.

    Yuro tends to bandwagon onto anything overpowered. Any time he's posting CV videos, I know they're completely broken.
  10. Battlecruiser_Repulse

    Thank you Jingles.

    "I generally think World of Warships would be better without them [carriers]." State of the current product, right there. Garbage ship type is garbage.
  11. Battlecruiser_Repulse

    Moskova - Worth FXPing

    Even the tier 9 - typically a cruiser graveyard- is pretty passable for the Soviets.
  12. Battlecruiser_Repulse

    Can someone please explain to me what Zerra is ranting about

    This patch is an amazingly stupid fix for a problem that wasn't that pronounced. Leave it to this company to swat a fly by catapulting a locomotive at it.
  13. Battlecruiser_Repulse

    Smolensk or Jean Bart?

    If you are proficient at battleships, understand positioning, and are okay with playing a relatively static role some of the time, Jean Bart feels like cheating. She's really that good.
  14. Battlecruiser_Repulse

    Blowouts.... something need to change soon

    The streakiness is bizarre, noticeable, and not - I believe - merely a product of imagination. I think there's a reason that WG is so tight-lipped about its matchmaking mechanics, and my personal belief is that it begins and ends with the thing being rigged in some manner.
×