Jump to content


  • Content Сount

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan


Community Reputation

56 Good

About Misfit87

  • Rank
    Master Chief Petty Officer
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

373 profile views
  1. Misfit87

    CVs are Still Overly Effective in 8.2

    Oh no. You did not read the rest of my post and told me to learn a game that I've been playing for over 3 years with over 8000 games. I feel so hurt. Yes, they do basically have unlimited planes. I know they have a cooldown and have to rebuild their squadron. So maybe you're the one that needs to learn the game. Also, please tell me the exact number of planes they have since it's limited according to you, the almighty know it all.
  2. Misfit87

    CVs are Still Overly Effective in 8.2

    I had a game last night where I was in my T5 USS Texas full AA spec with 19 point capt. We had two T6 CVs in the game. They both decided to focus me with other ships on my team around me. Took down 24 of their aircraft before they were able to delete me from the game. Of course, since they have unlimited aircraft this really means nothing to them. There was absolutely no counter to their air attacks. The enemy CV players even agreed that this was broken and needed to be fixed since I was arguably in the best T5 AA ship in the game. But according to the brilliant and know it alls at War Gaming everything is working as intended. Wake up WG such a small percentage base of your players actually like CVs. You've completely ruined this game for a lot of the player base. If we had one CV per side at ALL tiers things might be better. MAYBE!. Maybe WG needs to think about a staffing adjustment because it seems we just keep beating a dead horse and no one is listening! Go back to the way CVs were and limit them to one per side and everyone would be happy.
  3. Sorry OP but as a free to play player you have no choice or should voice your opinion about how my or other pay players paid ships are changed be it for the better or for the worse. That being said I am glad WG is not changing this ship and restoring confidence in that we’re paying for what we get and it’s not going to be changed. I do believe that WG wants what’s best for the game, but goes about things in a interesting order. First of all the timing was awful, secondly it destroyed the trust in we get what we pay for and it’s going to perform that way unless there is a global change, ie smoke and radar changes. Third problem was they based the change off pre cv rework stats and not post cv rework. CVs have a big roll in the game and this was blatantly ignored. The GC is still a strong tier 5 ship, but now what it was pre cv rework. All in in all I am glad to see WG doing the right thing and hope they continue to listen to the average players ie most of us on the forums and not the super unicum top 5%. Well done!
  4. The best decision War Gaming could have made under difficult circumstances.
  5. Misfit87

    And so it begins - Hello Alaska

    Not a bad first game for USS Alaska.
  6. Misfit87

    Update is poorly thought out

    Don't give them any ideas
  7. Misfit87

    How to contact WG, not through tickets.

    Thank you for your reply. I've been in contact with the support staff for over a week to no avail. Today they closed out my ticket and said that all further tickets would be ignored. So now the forums and sending messages to the Admins on the forums are my last option. Someone said last week to contact Radar_X, I did not want to do that at the time because support was still looking into the matter. I did send one to ikami That was about 15 minutes before I got a response from support saying that they closed out my ticket and will be ignoring all future tickets. I agree 100% the attitude of some players in this game is toxic and I am not sure how they get around in the real world. All conversation has been professional and conducted with respect.
  8. Misfit87

    Why spend money on the Witchita?

    There should be no hole. All of my communication with support staff have been pleasant and professional on my part and mostly there's. The only problem I've had with support staff is closing my ticket and telling me that all future tickets will be ignored. This is not how you treat people that support your game.
  9. Misfit87

    Why spend money on the Witchita?

    They are making a choice not to make things right. As I am making a choice not to support this game as I have done for the past three years with premium time and buying a lot of premium ships. The only bad part is I have 180 days of premium time left on my account.
  10. Misfit87

    Why spend money on the Witchita?

    Not if you researched the line after the update. I completely understand if you had the line before the update and then sold it in the inventory what would happen, but not if you researched the line after the update.
  11. Misfit87

    Why spend money on the Witchita?

    They never said sell through the port. There was not warning when I sold that ships that they would be reset. Sorry if you don't understand the whole problem here.
  12. Misfit87

    Why spend money on the Witchita?

    The reason is they want me to spend another $100 to covert the XP which I already paid for once.
  13. Misfit87

    Why spend money on the Witchita?

    Unfourtionalty the forums are the last place I have to turn to since the tickets are closed. If they can't correct an error like this then they should not be in the game development business. If you researched the CV line after the update you should not be able to reset the tech tree line anyway since you can't do this with any other class of ships.
  14. Misfit87

    How to contact WG, not through tickets.

    It was researched AFTER the update. Should not be locked.
  15. Misfit87

    How to contact WG, not through tickets.

    I have. I've sent a message to Radar_X, yesterday and no response. I've sent one to ikami and he did get back saying to wait on the support ticket. I responded that I've gone through several tickets to no avail. Still waiting on a hopeful second response.