Jump to content


  • Content Сount

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan


Community Reputation

591 Excellent

About legozer

  • Rank
    Lieutenant Junior Grade
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
  • Interests

Recent Profile Visitors

973 profile views
  1. legozer

    Acceptable Risk

    I was completely honest and upfront with every aspect of the scenarios I presented. There is no effort to sugar coat the truth. I admit, wholeheartedly that the fact the Amagi was a really bad player played a part in my decision (a fact that I could have easily omitted had I been dishonest about this). I am willing to accept fault if an argument is presented that shows my fault. Calling me a liar is nonsense. Saying that my stats make me a "poor thinker" is likewise absurd, and is in fact, the height of arrogance. It suggests that you "think better" than I do because you have had greater overall success at an arcade style computer game than I have. Not only is that arrogant, it's really, really stupid.
  2. legozer

    Acceptable Risk

    That is not at all what has been put forward. You are being extreme to the point of complete absurdity.
  3. legozer

    Acceptable Risk

    You couldn't find a way to highjack this into becoming a boring (and really dumb) argument about freedom of speech? C'mon, you can do it!
  4. legozer

    Acceptable Risk

    Ok. So, this is really dumb. I've given two examples of times where I've decided to take a team damage risk and invited some discussion about when/if it's acceptable. You decided that, since I have a 49.7x% WR, that I can't possibly be correct. That's a logical fallacy, and it will never hold water. If you have an actual argument with what I've posted, spit it out. Until then, your attempt to stat shame is, like I said, really dumb. I never, at any point argued that "I torp teammates to win games". I did say that I took the risk of hitting teammates on two occasions because I felt it was an acceptable risk given the circumstances. As has been discussed ad nauseum, stats don't always tell a complete story about the player. Mine certainly don't, and I could go into detail what I mean by that, but I don't care to at the moment; it's a different conversation to be had at another time. So, if you have a legitimate viewpoint to add, please, now is the time. If not, then piss up a rope.
  5. legozer

    Acceptable Risk

    Ah, an awkward attempt to stat shame with no real argument. It was only a matter of time, I suppose.
  6. legozer

    Acceptable Risk

    There is a big difference between " just to sink an enemy ship" and "to win".
  7. legozer

    Acceptable Risk

    Wrong again. Keep trying though, you're almost there.
  8. legozer

    Acceptable Risk

    To be clear, he wasn't going to factor into the game again, having somehow gotten stuck at J10 when the battle was many, many miles away. Utter, and complete isolation.
  9. legozer

    What Are These Shenanagins Wargaming

    I have no idea what any of this is, but I'm replying anyway.
  10. legozer

    Apology to Sky_Law

    Man! I would have torped him, and then flamed him in the forums for being so gullible! Afterwards, I'd laugh, and laugh, and laugh, and drink, and laugh, and drink, and cry (for no good reason), and laugh, and drink, and pass out, naked, on the living room floor.
  11. legozer

    Mid-Tier Mondays - The Cruisers

    Get it, and finally feel what it means to love.
  12. legozer

    Acceptable Risk

    Yes. That's why I shoot at all those red ships.
  13. legozer

    Acceptable Risk

    The answer is 'never'. I've literally never done it outside of those two examples, which is what got me thinking about the idea of acceptable risk.
  14. legozer

    Acceptable Risk

    The post isn't about how well you do in your Shimakaze, or how awesome you are at nobly avoiding team damage. Thanks for letting us know both, though. I did apologize, but that is immaterial to the discussion.
  15. legozer

    Acceptable Risk