

General_WTSherman
Members-
Content Сount
468 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
20041 -
Clan
[TF-60]
Community Reputation
214 Valued posterAbout General_WTSherman
-
Rank
Warrant Officer
- Profile on the website General_WTSherman
-
Insignia
Recent Profile Visitors
-
SANTA CRATES - What did you get? Share it here.
General_WTSherman replied to Hukom's topic in General Game Discussion
8 megas got 2500 doubloons, WBV41, poltava, and constellation -
RANKED
General_WTSherman replied to Samuel_Stevens_destroyer's topic in Player Feature and Gameplay Suggestions
My best ranked ships have been Des Moines and Z52, or gearing or daring none are premiums -
This video articulates subs better than I ever could...
General_WTSherman replied to YouSatInGum's topic in General Game Discussion
I would like to see new game modes and new maps more than subs also, it would be nice if the MM put subs and CV in the same slot—that would leave more surface ships in each game. The game feels empty with a CV and 2 subs -
New Devblog post on subs in randoms: includes 2 weeks of free skill resets/module demounts and a global reset button again.
General_WTSherman replied to Ensign_Cthulhu's topic in General Game Discussion
This entire dev blog was an attempted rebuttal to Flamu. they say subs were not OP (like CV isn’t OP). Yet, their own metrics show these to be the most influential classes in game… -
Will there be any way to avoid playing with subs other than quitting?
General_WTSherman replied to murder_0ne's topic in General Game Discussion
Not just bb’s; cruisers don’t push into good spots near caps in a cv game Your statement is made in absolute terms. While gameplay can be campy without CVS or subs, the greatly worsen the problem also a lot more clumping of ships in a CV game -
Will there be any way to avoid playing with subs other than quitting?
General_WTSherman replied to murder_0ne's topic in General Game Discussion
The problem is CV and subs make the game more campy—can’t surprise flank — cv spots you and kills you no one wants to push up to support DD’s because of cv spotting or subs the recent changes promote checkers and stale gameplay -
In general, his criticisms are echoed by the players who best understand the WOWS mechanics; he’s just a bit of a drama queen in his presentation
-
Given your obvious antipathy for Flamu, one must ask whether any criticism you levy in his direction can be taken as objective or more importantly, accurate
-
It has begun; Flamu on CV imbalance.
General_WTSherman replied to warheart1992's topic in General Game Discussion
I’ll be your huckleberry; the main reason DD’s are so influential is the are the best cap contesters like a CV, they can passively scout a Bb from range; however there is Often just narrow window between the spotting range, and the radar range. You will say “that’s true for planes too” Fundamental difference, however, is if the DD get spotted with radar for my making a mistake, he dies and the players game is over. If you make a mistake with your plane, you may lose a few, but the CV gets to keep playing. It Will have a short term impact on effectiveness, but ultimately at the end of the game, the CV would still be able to strike without too much difficulty. Depending on the ship, you will still push it in the Knowing there’s a DD there. Especially if you’re in a cruiser, or the cruiser is willing to push as well. Hydro can counter toros really well as can WASD hacks -
It has begun; Flamu on CV imbalance.
General_WTSherman replied to warheart1992's topic in General Game Discussion
It was not a part of NDA; a lot of the CCs showed this vid after the 2019 CC summit -
A shift of perspective (new NoZoup video)
General_WTSherman replied to warheart1992's topic in General Game Discussion
This change didn’t go through super testing supposedly The Cv rebork was panned by super testers and WG didn’t listen -
Dead eye is not that useful!
General_WTSherman replied to jags_domain's topic in General Game Discussion
Nope—standard detection means detection not affected by fires or the debuff after firing -
NA forum reacts to [RAIN]Sister analysis of Ashkance's reaction to Potatoe Quality's CV video
General_WTSherman replied to hateboat's topic in General Game Discussion
It totally is—when I heard him say it in the past, he did not sound remotely sarcastic I did not listen to this 180+ minute epic -
NA forum reacts to [RAIN]Sister analysis of Ashkance's reaction to Potatoe Quality's CV video
General_WTSherman replied to hateboat's topic in General Game Discussion
I doubt he wants to be dominated—he wants to dominate. Otherwise, he would play a different class only rarely play CV -
CV look to get stronger. FDR planes will be invulnerable after the changes