Jump to content


  • Content Сount

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan


Community Reputation

137 Valued poster

About Aiser50

  • Rank
    Master Chief Petty Officer
  • Birthday 06/08/1989
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

2,015 profile views
  1. Playing CB since its first implementation, I would really appreciate it if WG lowered the tier for a change. There was a time when they made it T8, but with a restriction of like 4/5 ships in a team I think. I argued this position MANY seasons ago, the line of counter argument I always got back then was "T10 is fair. because it lacks premium ships, therefore it's balanced". Which of course is nonsense. Unique upgrades, the massively overpowered nature that comes with the tier, the fact that some ships are just not useful in a 7v7 meta (such as Khab/YY ect) and the fact that now people can no longer cling tot he argument of a lack of premiums. The tier restriction is just one annoyance with me. With that tier, also comes a restrictions on a select few maps. There's only 1 map I actually like from the CB list, the rest are just boring and incentivize certain play styles. Really, at this point, there is no argument to keep CB at T10, other then pushing people to pay big bucks for their T10 prems.
  2. Aiser50

    Kansas - Awful -

    I really don't understand why the reload for this line has to be so long. There is no special feature to them. They, or at least as Kansas goes have shells with weights on par to their same tier counterparts which is unusual for USN BBs. USN BB AP shells tend to weight a whole lot more for the same MM caliber as their national counter parts, this is what gives them unique pen. On top of that, the turret traverse is unjustifiably loooooooong. USSR BBs suffer almost the same reload problems, but at least on the top tiers, the turret traverse base is an impressive 30s. These new USN BB's remain at 45s turret traverse on every tier.
  3. Hello WG It's been so long since I've posted on these boards. Something that I would like to see added to this cool feature of five year of naval anniversary, would be total Ranked season results. For example I myself have ranked out 11 times, NOT INCLUDING the 13 ranked sprints. The previous ranked season was the only one that I've not ranked out in years. It would be interesting to see what % of people have ranked out as much or more then I. Thanks. o7
  4. Honestly, WG, why do you have release a new incredibly annoying ship with such ridiculous gimmicks just before each ranked season? This ship coupled with smoke, 16 guns, Grozovoi shells and its incredible long range is really too much. This ship seriously needs a range nerf. How do you give Khab so many nerfs a few years back and release a ship like Smolensk?
  5. WG, this is a very disappointed turn of events for Conq. https://worldofwarships.com/en/news/game-updates/update-088-fourth-anniversary/ I really enjoy using the 457mm AP on my UU spec Conq. The gun options on Conq really gives the player between choosing less guns but 0.2+ more sigma accuracy, better AP and AP ballistics with less reliable HE ballistics and the 419 with good HE ballistics, worse AP ballistics less accuracy but more guns. I do hope this supposed change gets a second review and is not implemented.
  6. Aiser50

    Rooting for WOWS to Fail

    Indeed it is a strange phenomena. But I would like to add, this for some strange reason is a uniquely American behavior phenomena. There is a tendency in American psyche that I've observed, where many seem to have some favorite brand/company like say WG and its WoWs game. But at the same time, they root for the company/game/what ever to fail, yet continue to consume the product. You don't really see this kind on of mentality elsewhere and I don't really understand why.
  7. Aiser50

    Discussion on French DDs- CE or AFT? Why?

    Only have the Guepard. Right now, I am comfortable having IFHE first and CE later on. I use main bat mod 2 for better turret traverse to preserve 2 skill points. Right now I only have PM, LS, SE, IFHE since its 10 points. I feel that the accuracy is good enough to not need aim system mod 1, but I will have to invest in either bft or DE later on. You can bring the fire chance of these French DDs up to 11% max if you have IFHE on which is not so bad. A French DD with IFHE gives those 139mms the equivalent pen power of Donskois 180mms at 29mm up from 22mm. To me its worth it due to the raw 2000 HE shell dmg to pen those 25mm plates.
  8. Aiser50

    Hakuryu vs Midway

    Hakuryus 4 Torp bomber squad has the most potential and takes the most skill. When you max concealment on yourplanes, then your torp bombers reach 6.1km concealment. The 4 torp squads have torps that travel a total of 8km. If you know how to aim those torps from a long distance while remaining unspotted, then I give you the title "God of CVs"
  9. Aiser50

    WOWS single player mode unlocked

    The best co-op is when none of your allies are humans.
  10. GK is one of my favorite ships to play. As someone whom does not like to play T10 unless some event/mission/campaign forces me to then it means something. Really the only thing I can think of to buff this ship, is for WG to PLEASE BUFF THIS UU!!! That "Legendary" is just horrible. GK already has the shortest range of all T10 bbs at 20.6km. But this garbage UU brings it down to 18.96km when you view it from the reticle. It also only adds a negligible -1s reload in comparison to main bat mod 3. Why equip it for a 15% buff to your secondaries when secondary bat mod 2 gives a 20% buff? What is really unfair towards GK is how the UU for Conq and Monty give no bad side effects at all. While the bad side effects to Republiques UU are tolerable. GK's UU is up there as one of the worst if not, then THE WORST UU of all. What I want for WG to do, is to remove the range nerf on GK's UU and perhaps replace that with say another -7% to shell dispersion. And perhaps add a little bit more AA. GK's AA is simply the worst of all T10 BBs.
  11. Aiser50

    Georgia Max Dispersion

    The more range, the more dispersion. When you input art plot mod 2 without mod 1, the 194 dispersion will give 20km range the dispersion of say 18/17km IDK.. You can play with these stats here. https://wowsft.com/ship?index=PASB729&modules=1111&upgrades=004004&commander=PCW001&consumables=1111&lang=en
  12. Aiser50

    Georgia Max Dispersion

    You are using Artillery plotting mod 1 and the Artillery plotting mod 2 upgrades. While they are just using Artillery plotting mod 2 upgrade.
  13. Aiser50

    T8 CW

    Whats the big problem here? All this emphasis on T10 started to get annoying many months ago. It's such a stupid tier packed with super gimmicks. It's about time they lower the tier to something less stressful. It would be even better if they lowered it to T7 or T6. T10 is really the most annoying tier of the game and also where many get burned out quickly. We don't need every event to revolve around T10 after T10 after T10 after T10 over and over again. That's it....enough already.
  14. Aiser50

    German Legendary Commander

    This is silly. By this logic, why do we have a bunch of weebish captains, Steven Seagull/ Doe, Halloween and Dasha Perova introduced as Cmdrs? I have nothing to rethink from my words simply because I know there is no such hypocrisy from my statement as you think. It's just a hard truth about America, you can introduce a historical cmdr/captain or what ever to this game and only really Americans would be upset. It's the same thing that happen when Molotov was introduced. No one created any fuss but Americans because of its name. Americans even get offended by a Japanese Manji. They still stay upset when a Manjis historical meaning is explained to them. Keep this garbage "outrage culture" confined to it's borders of origin.
  15. Aiser50

    German Legendary Commander

    German WWII special Cmdrs should be included in. But the problem is the out cry from Americans and perhaps British players. Present day America is too SJW, politically correct and degenerate to not see passed entertainment and a video game and somehow assume the inclusion of a historical person as some kind endorsement of that person. America is the problem here. The rest of the international player base most likely would not care. I myself would not even minded if FDR, Stalin and Hitler were to be introduced as special Cmdrs.