Jump to content

landcollector

Members
  • Content Сount

    909
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    1282
  • Clan

    [SVF]

Community Reputation

183 Valued poster

About landcollector

Recent Profile Visitors

851 profile views
  1. I wouldn't be surprised if they really thought that, at this point. What a disappointment.
  2. If they don't want FXP anymore, then why are they having piles of 35000 FXP as a loot option in the paid Black Friday crates?
  3. landcollector

    Steel Price for Bourgogne

    It's a T10 BB, and those must be more expensive than a T10 "cruiser". General WG pricing model.
  4. landcollector

    WoWS Dev Blog: Balance Changes (American Battleships)

    Okay, you're not making sense to me, so I'm just going to move on.
  5. landcollector

    WoWS Dev Blog: Balance Changes (American Battleships)

    You were talking about BB caliber guns having close to CA level reloads. What else am I supposed to think?
  6. landcollector

    WoWS Dev Blog: Balance Changes (American Battleships)

    I can't help but feel you're not really making sense here, and are railing more about Jean Bart and Bourgogne's Main Battery Reload Booster than really discussing USN BBs. 34s --> 30s or 31s is not an unrealistic buff.
  7. Percentages are not publically known, but it's good to assume "Very Slim" as the chance.
  8. They will not say anything of this nature, bet on it.
  9. landcollector

    Musashi/Kronshtadt Leaving (8.0) - Misouri in SC's!

    Is it really being jaded, or just reading the tea leaves and basing thoughts on Sub_Octavian's recent comments of "Too much FXP is around and too many FXP ships in the MM"? Anyway, nina might still be incorrect about never seeing 750k FXP ships again. We might- at T7. =\
  10. landcollector

    WoWS Dev Blog: Bourgogne for Steel. FML!

    Out of curiosity, since Bourgogne is slated to go live soon as an Arsenal ship, has anyone gone datamining to figure out her Steel cost?
  11. landcollector

    WoWS Dev Blog: Balance Changes (American Battleships)

    I'm almost afraid to ask you to elaborate on this.
  12. landcollector

    WoWS Dev Blog: Balance Changes (American Battleships)

    A hull rudder buffs are lame and will go mostly unused since most players skip them asap.
  13. landcollector

    WoWS Dev Blog: Design B-65 AKA "Azuma"

    10k more HP than Alaska (of course >_>), but slightly thinner plating means overmatch from 380mm AP. Main caliber 5mm larger, fitting with the IJN prevalence of doing that for funsies. Max range maybe 100m longer than Alaska's, mostly indiscernible. 800 more max HE damage with identical fire chance. Max AP damage is 250 less. Both shell types are faster, of course. Max dispersion ~11m better. 1 knot faster than Alaska but with 70m worse turn radius and 0.9s worse RST. 400m better base surface detection and ~1250m worse base air detection. "short" range AA around 12 DPS worse than Alaska's 34x1 20mm, but 1.1 km better base range. Mid range flat out worse with ~90 less DPS, but the long range makes up for that. 76 DPS better compared to Alaska's 90-ish DPS from her 6x2 127mm DP mounts.
  14. landcollector

    Dev Blog, "German" T4 BB Viribus Unitis,

    I mean, it's good concealment and all, but pretty sure it won't stay that good for long.
  15. landcollector

    Dev Blog, "German" T4 BB Viribus Unitis,

    Edit: Triple post, my apologies once again. >_>
×