Jump to content

tcbaker777

Members
  • Content Сount

    9,632
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    15614
  • Clan

    [HINON]

Community Reputation

4,576 Superb

About tcbaker777

  • Rank
    Vice Admiral
  • Birthday 01/23/1996
  • Insignia
    [HINON]

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    USA

Recent Profile Visitors

11,132 profile views
  1. gotta agree on the dumbfire torps being the more useful ones instead of the homing, if WG would make all the subs like that maybe they wouldnt be as hated, have the homing be close in and the dumbfire be the long range and they have the torpedo turning on their dumbfires now iirc
  2. well, with recent buffs the T9 and T10 have torps that can basically one shot just about every DD theyll see and cripple most cruisers with them doing 29K, officially, the highest damage torpedoes in the game, but they only have 1 per side though
  3. if youre getting clapped by AA, the problem lies between your screen and whatever youre sitting in as CV players told us surface ship players at the start of the Rework "Just Dodge"
  4. tcbaker777

    Consistent Performer: Pommern

    Basically the same thing you're saying, if she gets a chance to get into brawling range and make use of her torps, she's a force to be reckoned with
  5. SpReAdsHeEt sAyS yOu hAd FuN- WG probably
  6. tcbaker777

    Which ships for upcoming 1:1 brawl (T9)?

    I bet you there'll be some Kearsarges that show up, seeing as it's got those planes to harass the only other ship there
  7. tcbaker777

    DevBlog 331 - Closed test 0.11.6 - New Ships

    tbf, Johnston and Laffey could also count that survival to their damage control crews and not just how they were built, but as you said, subs werent meant to take hits and basically any hit that put a hole in the ship effectively put it out of combat because then it couldnt dive
  8. tcbaker777

    Subs still broke.....

    tell that to the US standard BB line
  9. tcbaker777

    Premiums that are so bad that is funny?

    Oklahoma, the ONLY thing going for that ship is its looks, nothing more
  10. tcbaker777

    Incentivize Veteran Players to Play Mid & Low Tiers

    its an amazing idea, which is exactly why WG is never going to do it as i heard someone say "If you ever feel useless, remember that there are people modeling T1-T4 ships" bottom line is, T1-T4 doesnt make enough money in WG's eyes, the moment you find a way for them to better monetize those tiers, i guarantee theyll rush to find ways to get players to play those tiers, until then, WG couldnt care less about them
  11. tcbaker777

    Is this what I think it is?

    With super ships now a thing, Kitakami might just have found it's spot
  12. i see no problem with Black returning, theres several more radar DDs out there now that can probably run circles around Black, like Ragnar
  13. tcbaker777

    The "Turretless Iowas" idea.

    fit more stuff on them?
  14. tcbaker777

    Italian Destroyers are absolutely unplayable

    Sadly, this seems to be the case with the whole Italian tech tree, mediocre until the high tiers, at least the cruisers and DDs have some sort of fun value to them, but the BBs got screwed over in WG's attempt at balancing out BB caliber SAP with getting every negative trait put on the main guns
  15. The fact that it forces skills to be taken at all is ridiculous
×