Jump to content


  • Content Сount

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan


Community Reputation

51 Good

1 Follower

About Chief_Runamuck

  • Rank
    Master Chief Petty Officer
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

610 profile views
  1. WG's only mistake with the Missouri was pulling it from the game after saying it would always be available. The credibility issue is far more detrimental than the economics. Changing the Missouri now would only deepen that credibility problem for the players that managed to acquire it before the "always" time frame ran out. I'm glad I got mine when I did, but if I had missed the deadline on that one, it probably would have killed the game for me. As it is, I think it's sad that current players do not have access to this iconic ship. BTW How does making the grind even slower and more monotonous "fix" a "burnout" problem? Did I accidentally get transported to an alternate universe or something?
  2. Sorry Zoup. I usually agree with you, but not this time. In fact, I can't say I agree with anything in this video.
  3. Chief_Runamuck

    It’s time for a USN BB Split Culminating with Ohio

    I agree 100% with you, Zoup. WoWs has "jumped the shark" when it comes to both the historical aspect and (to a slightly lesser extent) the mid tiers. The USN BB line split would be a great way to get the game back on track. There are plenty of real USN ships that have yet to make it into the game without adding these fantasy creations.
  4. Chief_Runamuck

    Second CV refund

    I sold all my CVs with the rework and recently started grinding them again (currently at T6 with both nations). After this change, I'm starting to think it's not worth the effort. The aiming delay on unguided rockets is beyond ridiculous as is the 20% detect reduction. There might be room to tweak the detection range, but screwing up the aiming system is complete [edited]. At best, My CVs will probably remain parked at this point. The CV rework has good potential, but I'm out of patience and considering a break from the game.
  5. Chief_Runamuck

    Poll on 8.0 patch

    I don't know yet; but I can't say I'm thrilled about having to re-learn the game. I sold all my CVs except the Saipan and reset all of my captains but am having a hard time finding the motivation to play.
  6. Chief_Runamuck

    BB AP v. DD Armor. What’s the big deal?

    I agree with Zoup on this one. At best, the change is unnecessary. More likely, it's a step in the wrong direction.
  7. Chief_Runamuck

    Supertest: Damage Limit DD vs BB

    It hasn't been implemented yet; but yes, I suspect it would be noticed.
  8. Chief_Runamuck

    Supertest: Damage Limit DD vs BB

    I don't agree with AP nerf. I like DDs and BBs equally and play both often. If anything, this will increase BB camping unless BBs are given more realistic values on secondary guns. Why shouldn't a 14", 15", 16", or 18" shell cause massive amounts of damage to a smaller ship? IRL One of these shell hits would be enough to incapacitate (and probably sink) a DD whether it exploded or not. That's what BB shells are supposed to do. DDs have plenty of other advantages to balance the equation.... just my 2 cents...