LordJP_

Designer's Table and Hawaii port have the best music in my opinion.

Bought 2x5 Premium containers and got a rock didn't get any ship. Was expecting at least one to make the price worth it. By order of opening: 1x Anshan Special permanent camouflage - I already have the ship so this will have an use 20k Free XP 8 days of premium 20k free XP 12 Lunar Warrior camos ___________________________________ 12 Lunar Warrior camos 12 Lunar Warrior camos 20k free XP 750 doubloons 12 Lunar Warrior camos Oh well, I was willing to gamble...

/signed I would like some of my ships to have the looks of Victory Salute, Hunter and Gamescon camos.

Yes, this has to be a bug. I've had this happen to me and it's really annoying! I use RMB a lot to look around and don't get "tunnel-visioned" but sometimes my guns are locked at the complete opposite of where I wanted them to be. I remember this happening since around mid 2017 I think. Makes you lose time in the heat of the fight trying to lock the guns AGAIN in the right direction, or even waiting for the turret traverse because guns were pointing at the wrong direction for some time and you didn't realize.

These are the boundaries: http://legal.na.wargaming.net/en/game-rules-wows/ "2. Prohibited uses, restrictions and conditions of use You agree not to do any of the following while accessing or using the Game, Game chats, and any other communication channels provided by Wargaming: 2.01 Transmit, or facilitate the transmission of, any content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, that may be invasive of another’s right of privacy or publicity, hateful, racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;" If you agreed with these terms when you started playing the game, you should take any punishment WG see fit for your behavior inside their game. If you are not allowed to say that to somebody IRL, you shouldn't be saying it in game chat. If the person's rules about morality is invasive of another's rights, the first can keep his opinion for himself.

I can get salty but I can't imagine anything that could ever happen online or IRL that would make me cross that line. I've come across as rude before because it's just text, people can't hear the intonation of your voice. But that's just too much. First: The sheer thought that you are better than anybody else because they think/look/behave different than what fits your standards is BEYOND ridiculous; Second: if you go on a homophobic/racist/ethnic or any other form of discrimination because of an online game, you have way bigger problems than the bad results you are getting. Seriously, go seek for treatment. This should get a heavier punishment, in my opinion. Way too many people made sacrifices in the past and still make every day just so we can have the right of freedom we have today. Not to have an entitled snowflake think he is better than somebody else in the world because that somebody doesn't fit his standards. This should be an instantaneous perma-chat ban. No temporary ban, no 3 strikes-policy, no questions asked. Just be gone back to where you came from with your "opinion". The only reason they do this online is because they feel safe they won't get the punishment they deserve. This is the way the person actually thinks but he just doesn't express this IRL because he doesn't feel as safe, or worse, he actually does. As Harvy72 said, this isn't just about being politically incorrect. This is about being a trash person.

I don't usually complain about Matchmaking in chat, but when I do is because of this: I'm not expecting to be favoured by MM every single match I'm in and be top tier every time, I just don't like being one out of two or even the single bottom-tier ship and become one of the few the punching bags for enemies 2 tiers above me. Guess which ships had to be EXTRA careful in that match? And it could have been way worse for me, NC is actually a pretty damn fine tier 8 battleship. I wouldn't like to be a Tirpitz/Bismarck in this situation. I wouldn't care about being bottom tier if the number of ships of each tier taking part in the match was divided more equally. Not 1 or 2 tier 8 ships because "F these guys in particular", 2 more tier 9 and all the rest tier 10. At least they could create a rule so the top tier can't be more than half the team's composition or something like that.

Mountain range, without any doubt. Even the lighting is bad on that map and can make it hard to see things.

Yeah I agree with Sheik. I don't really think that an enraged post with exclamation marks and full CapsLock will make WG feel any more "pressed" to solve the problems of the game.

If they keep the 4 weeks cycle between patches, 0.8.0 should go live January 16th. So January 15th is the last day you have to buy it.

One thing I always wanted was one of the miniatures in the background of these posts: https://worldofwarships.com/en/news/common/yesarizonasback/ https://worldofwarships.com/en/news/common/jingleshells/ https://worldofwarships.com/en/news/common/docommandersdreamofeclecticships/ Can you imagine this Scharnhost on your table? I would feel like a kid with a new toy.

About a month ago. I was in my Nelson bottom tier in a T9 match, map was Land of Fire. First salvo of damage I received was a couple of citadels through my bow from an Alabama 18km away. "Yeah sure, RNG. Whatever you want!" Healed back to have just enough health to be the devastating strike of an Akatsuki in B while I was retreating from C. Was a quick game not only for me, our T9s were terrible that match and we got stomped. I remember that being the only game I played that night.

@Estimated_Prophet Blys can't Def AA but it's guns are great to take care of the Schnellboote. A well coordinated team with Blyskas and some AA specc'ed Sims is a garanteed 5 star.

Can confirm, my first attempt in the Sims I got top score with 54 planes shot down using my Cleveland 19pts captain. Blyskawica is also fun if you have it. 7(!) shells per salvo with flat trajectory can easily one shot a Schnellboot if you have good aim!

I was called a cheater in a battle in my Richelieu today and the frustrating part was that the guy just didn't want to understand what happened. Some context: A guy comes around an island full broadside in his NC. I punch his citadel. He then angles away "kitting" me and shooting at my Rich's bow/belt armor while I shoot his superstructure. He, along with some of his teammates, proceeds to call me a chater because he dealt minimal damage to me while I sunk him. Some screenshots with my shots and his return fire: https://imgur.com/a/7Ys5qmY? (None of my teammates told anything in chat so I didn't bother to cover their names, they actually played well, even though we lost. I hope this won't fall under name and shaming) Now the frustrating part: I politely sent a message to the guy in port (I wanted him to pay attention, not rage at me) and tried to explain him what just happened. I felt as if I was talking to a wall. I tried to lead him to the information but he just wanted to remain uninformed. In a situation like this you don't have any way to readly point him in the right direction using the game client. You can only link him to X website Now what I think would have helped? Maybe if we had this information available in the client, moments like these could be avoided. Have access to information directly through the client, the same way we "conveniently" have the premium shop, WG! Name it "Important to Know Before Playing" in big red letters or something like that. Have an introdutory campaign with battles vs bots in which the game manipulates common situations you will find yourself while playing each class happening in a controled environment: "Bounce the enemy shot! To do this you need to be at X angle (Have it show the player he should turn his ship). Enemy guns can't damage you because X reason (have overmatch explained here)". Or "Keeping your ship afloat: This enemy cruiser will set many fires on you but stay calm. Fire damage is 100% repairable (explain how Repair Party works vs each type of damage) and your big battleship don't need to use DCP on a single fire." Spot for your team (Have spotting mechanics explained and show the player how to do it). "Where and how to aim: If your enemy is a BB usually shoot here. If he is angled, shoot here. If it's a cruiser and you are X class, shoot here." Teach the player to shoot the least angled part of an enemy ship and so on... Make each of these matches accessible at any time like a "Single Player Campaign". If the player wants to play the "Angling" or the "Spotting" lesson again he can. I think the "How It Works" series is a big step in the right direction, I'd be ok with resorting to 3rd party websites to find some information but make it also accessible through the client. Same with basic game mechanics. Sure, people can watch CCs for more advanced guides like positioning or how to play a specific ship, but at least hidden stats E.g. torpedo flooding chance or HE pen on specific lines shouldn't be hidden anymore. Back to this specific case: I can't put the fault on WG. I just pointed him what to search and even told him to ask WG support (he told he was sending a ticket) how it works so he could get the information from a trustable source if he didn't want to trust me, but he just ignored. I don't know why he'd want to remain oblivious to something that could give an advantage (knowing a game mechanic) in a competitive environment like a PvP game. You could argue that he doesn't take WoWS as competitive but he clearly showed to be annoyed by the idea of the enemy having an advantage over him. Could also be that I just got trolled. But my point still stands: have more information easily available to the playerbase can't be that bad, can it?