LordJP_

Don't know why I'm getting this impression, but at this point I'm suspecting Wargaming is in fact not very good with reworks, or balance, or just good decision-making in general.

12 Camos, 50 Zulu flags and a Yudachi from the mega Satan container here. Nothing to complain IMO. Even if the ship isn't anything special compared to other tier 7 DDs, at least it was free and prevents me from getting it in a container I may actually pay for in the future.

Oh god, yes! Would be great if that could be fixed, it is so annoying!

Mine has three thumb buttons. The one closest to my normal thumb position I binded to "X" to manually lock on to targets. The other 2 are for ~ (AA sector) and Ctrl, which I hold to make the mouse point appear in battle.

The transport ships are showing weird behavior, to say the least. In Narai I had runs where one of the transports decided to not go straight to the beaches, like it should but go full speed to the middle of the fight instead, straight to the enemie's spawn, got killed and prevented us from getting a 5-star win. In Newport one of the heal ships decided to do a random sail-around in front of a wave of enemy bots and got killed, instead of sitting still like they used to do. I don't recall seeing weird behavior in Aegis. While we got your attention on the topic of Scenarios, any news on the removed ones coming back any time soon or even at all?

Another one for the history of great posts from you two in all these years contributing to the community! For the giveaway: LordJP_ on NA server. The most memorable ship of 2019 in my opinion is the Thunderer. I would define it as a "comfortable all around" ship to play, kind of like a Giulio Cesare of tier 10. It's more fragile than same tier and ship type competitors but it's still in the range between decent to good in other aspects, with it's most defining characteristic being the good gunnery. You don't feel like you are constantly fighting against your own ship to get things done in the Thunderer. Need to delete a cruiser? The good turret traverse, good alpha and accuracy will get it done. Need to fight an angled battleship? No problem, it's just as powerful spamming HE. You don't like the long rudder shift time of normal battleships? Good news, here's a 10,4s RS time, you can even use DCS mod. 2 without feeling you are giving up on maneuvrability.

Designer's Table and Hawaii port have the best music in my opinion.

Bought 2x5 Premium containers and got a rock didn't get any ship. Was expecting at least one to make the price worth it. By order of opening: 1x Anshan Special permanent camouflage - I already have the ship so this will have an use 20k Free XP 8 days of premium 20k free XP 12 Lunar Warrior camos ___________________________________ 12 Lunar Warrior camos 12 Lunar Warrior camos 20k free XP 750 doubloons 12 Lunar Warrior camos Oh well, I was willing to gamble...

/signed I would like some of my ships to have the looks of Victory Salute, Hunter and Gamescon camos.

Yes, this has to be a bug. I've had this happen to me and it's really annoying! I use RMB a lot to look around and don't get "tunnel-visioned" but sometimes my guns are locked at the complete opposite of where I wanted them to be. I remember this happening since around mid 2017 I think. Makes you lose time in the heat of the fight trying to lock the guns AGAIN in the right direction, or even waiting for the turret traverse because guns were pointing at the wrong direction for some time and you didn't realize.

These are the boundaries: http://legal.na.wargaming.net/en/game-rules-wows/ "2. Prohibited uses, restrictions and conditions of use You agree not to do any of the following while accessing or using the Game, Game chats, and any other communication channels provided by Wargaming: 2.01 Transmit, or facilitate the transmission of, any content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, that may be invasive of another’s right of privacy or publicity, hateful, racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;" If you agreed with these terms when you started playing the game, you should take any punishment WG see fit for your behavior inside their game. If you are not allowed to say that to somebody IRL, you shouldn't be saying it in game chat. If the person's rules about morality is invasive of another's rights, the first can keep his opinion for himself.

I can get salty but I can't imagine anything that could ever happen online or IRL that would make me cross that line. I've come across as rude before because it's just text, people can't hear the intonation of your voice. But that's just too much. First: The sheer thought that you are better than anybody else because they think/look/behave different than what fits your standards is BEYOND ridiculous; Second: if you go on a homophobic/racist/ethnic or any other form of discrimination because of an online game, you have way bigger problems than the bad results you are getting. Seriously, go seek for treatment. This should get a heavier punishment, in my opinion. Way too many people made sacrifices in the past and still make every day just so we can have the right of freedom we have today. Not to have an entitled snowflake think he is better than somebody else in the world because that somebody doesn't fit his standards. This should be an instantaneous perma-chat ban. No temporary ban, no 3 strikes-policy, no questions asked. Just be gone back to where you came from with your "opinion". The only reason they do this online is because they feel safe they won't get the punishment they deserve. This is the way the person actually thinks but he just doesn't express this IRL because he doesn't feel as safe, or worse, he actually does. As Harvy72 said, this isn't just about being politically incorrect. This is about being a trash person.

I don't usually complain about Matchmaking in chat, but when I do is because of this: I'm not expecting to be favoured by MM every single match I'm in and be top tier every time, I just don't like being one out of two or even the single bottom-tier ship and become one of the few the punching bags for enemies 2 tiers above me. Guess which ships had to be EXTRA careful in that match? And it could have been way worse for me, NC is actually a pretty damn fine tier 8 battleship. I wouldn't like to be a Tirpitz/Bismarck in this situation. I wouldn't care about being bottom tier if the number of ships of each tier taking part in the match was divided more equally. Not 1 or 2 tier 8 ships because "F these guys in particular", 2 more tier 9 and all the rest tier 10. At least they could create a rule so the top tier can't be more than half the team's composition or something like that.

Mountain range, without any doubt. Even the lighting is bad on that map and can make it hard to see things.

Yeah I agree with Sheik. I don't really think that an enraged post with exclamation marks and full CapsLock will make WG feel any more "pressed" to solve the problems of the game.