Jump to content

Totenliste

Members
  • Content Сount

    24
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    9136
  • Clan

    [COOP2]

Community Reputation

26 Neutral

1 Follower

About Totenliste

  • Rank
    Seaman
  • Birthday September 7
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Glendale, AZ

Recent Profile Visitors

574 profile views
  1. Totenliste

    Your best Co-op Game(s) / Stats

    200K Damage game in T7 ARP Haguro
  2. Totenliste

    Your best Co-op Game(s) / Stats

    7 Kill 161K Damage game with the T6 Nurnberg (which is real hard to do considering HP totals per Tier of ships)
  3. Totenliste

    Not receiving the correct Base XP

    Basically not applying base xp in Right hand column Premium side. Only applying base xp on the non-premium column for the directives. Base Earnings Revealed The amounts of base earning appear in the post-battle report. Base XP earned appears on the 'Team Score' tab and is used to rank team performance. It also appears on the 'Credits and XP' tab in the left-hand (non-premium) column as XP/Received/Earned above where its use in calculating derived XP values is broken out. Base Credits earned appears on the 'Credits and XP' tab on the top line of the left-hand column. (The right-hand column is modified by Premium Account).
  4. Totenliste

    Developer Diaries: Update 0.8.8

    For Co-op the mercy rule needs to go and you need to make Matchmaker only do 2 dd per game since if you have 3 dd 2 c and 3 bb the 3 bb will see hardly any action before the dds kill everything and/or the mercy rule kicks in ruining the game for the bbs. It costs to much to undock the things to make no points/credits. Of course when homing torpedo subs appear you won't see any BBs again in matchs anyway and no one wants to play CVs anyway so they won't matter for subs. How about adding some scenarios for lower 2-4 and upper 8-10 tiers. Want people to play lower tiers make them worth playing.
  5. Totenliste

    Italian Battleship Lineup

    Re-updated list. Thanks to links from other contributors. Their links have been added for reference.
  6. Well I hope its true won't hold my breath. They really need to focus on the Dutch and Italian tech trees then branch out to others I know the Spanish have enough to make a few trees not sure about anyone else probably mostly end up with premium one shots.
  7. So WoWs has decided to do a lump of the Pan-European Nations. Dutch (even though they have enough DD/CA to do their own lines), with Poland, and Austria. What a hot mess, is it to much to ask for individual country sections? I think it is an insult to those nations being lumped together. There were so many great ships during WWI-WWII and some that were proposed but never saw the light of day. Seriously WoWs don't mess this up. I mean are you going to lump other nations in here to like Finland, Sweden, Greece, Spain, etc...? Come on.
  8. Totenliste

    Italian Cruiser Line up that Should Be

    Whelp looks like WoWs has finally started to work on this. Looks like I got 4 right of 7 though not sure I agree making the 2 Ducas into 2 different Condottieri class of the same tier I mean the Trento was an entirely different hull then the VI/VII Duca and the VII Zara as well. I mean technically this would make the Duca d'Aosta a IV and the Abruzzi a V.
  9. Hey LordHood2252 if you could throw up some links to those other lines feel free and as for who gets first dibs Italy or Netherlands to tell you the truth I just want more ships in the game for separate countries we all want more ships to grind thru though I really don't understand why they are dumping Russian (Hypothetical BBs) on us when there are so many more deserving real ones [Yes I understand the game is developed by Russians but whats that word? Oh yes Priorities]... they could do like Italian Cruisers or BBs or Netherlands DDs or Cruisers and the upcoming CV changes have got me wanting to go back to just playing DDs, CLs, and BBs, I will hold judgement til I try it but it sounds even more FUBAR then before. I was looking into doing Cruiser/DD lines for Greece and also something for Sweden but I haven't got back to it since I've been grinding for the new German T6 BB (P.E.F.). And yes we can all agree there are a lot of ships that still need representation hence why we do these fan production lines. If these Lines help the Devs at all with making choices then its worth it.
  10. Yeah I like the Celebes better here than the Tromp. The Tromp feels more like a DD.
  11. Yeah I liked it better as a destroyer myself.
  12. I see what you mean. I will change it. To tell you the truth the Tromp was hard to place and thanks for the info about Eendracht. I will make adjustments.
  13. Totenliste

    Possible Spanish Cruiser line

    Thanks Lord_Magus I'll look into these. I was using the Ansaldo for the Italians but I guess they were being designed for the Spanish after all and nothing says you can't go across countries after all WG already has anyway lol.
  14. T1 Calvo Sotelo http://www.navypedia.org/ships/spain/sp_of_calvo_sotelo.htm T2 Extremadura http://www.navypedia.org/ships/spain/sp_cr_estremadura.htm or T2 Reina Regente http://www.navypedia.org/ships/spain/sp_cr_reina_regente.htm T3 Navarra https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_cruiser_Navarra_(1923) T4 Blas de Lezo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blas_de_Lezo-class_cruiser T5 Almirante Cervera https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almirante_Cervera-class_cruiser T6 Project 131 https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/5986-spanish-heavy-cruiser-project-131/ T7 Canarias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canarias-class_cruiser T8 Ansaldo Plan I https://stefsap.wordpress.com/2015/11/15/the-1940s-super-washington-ansaldo-cruisers-for-spain-1200-plans-i/ T9 Ansaldo Plan III https://stefsap.wordpress.com/2015/11/30/the-1940s-super-washington-ansaldo-cruisers-for-spain-1200-plans-iii/ T10 Project 138 https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/5987-spanish-heavy-cruiser-project-138/ * Suggestions welcome not above making adjustments to new info. Thanks Lord_Magus.
  15. T1 Johan Mauritis van Nassau https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HNLMS_Johan_Maurits_van_Nassau T2 Holland https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holland-class_cruiser T3 Java https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java-class_cruiser T4 Celebes (upgraded Java see comments below) Thanks LordHood2252 T5 De Ruyter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HNLMS_De_Ruyter_(1935) T6 Kruiser 1937 (Pre-Eendracht design see comments below) Here again Thanks LordHood2252 T7 Eendracht https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/167842-an-in-depth-proposal-for-eendracht-as-t5-premium-dutch-cl/ T8 De Zeven https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Zeven_Provinciën-class_cruiser T9 * T10 * They had a new Battlecruiser planned but never built (Battlecruiser Holland [1940] or Design 1047) problem is it compares really well to the BB Scharnhorst so can't really use it here. Though it might make for a good premium T6-7 Battleship https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_1047_battlecruiser * Thoughts welcome and I will take comments into the line. * I have eliminated the Flotilla Leader Tromp class from this line it makes for a better DD. Thanks [HINON] Lert for the advice.
×