TsundereMusashi

None. I would outright prefer Russian tanks going Jesus, cruising on top of the water over fantasy Russian CVs.

Yes

My idea of a brawler BB Shinano (retaining 9, 46cm guns) was alot better. There's really no reason for anyone to ever go above 46cms in this game.

I forgot to purchase the captains that I don't already have yet, is there a possibility to earn them in game at least?

How does that stack up to the Ohio? From what i've been hearing it potentially has the most potent secondary setup right now.

.... I mean I described later on in my initial post how she could potentially be different, you did read the entire post besides the first sentence right? o_O As well we have three Iowa hulls, two Sodak classes that aren't the Sodak herself (which will inevitably be added to the game at some later point) I don't see why they wouldn't add another planned variation of the Yamato class ingame in the armory. And I predict this will end up being the only way Shinano will ever be added to the game, there are far more relevant carriers that can be added as premiums that would be playable/viable ingame than Shinano could ever be as a CV. That's not even mentioning how unpopular CV's are as is in contrast to BB's.

No they didn't. Only a handful of people disagreed with me, when I specifically asked you why on your position, you ghosted the thread as if you had no argument outside of muh history.

Would be pretty neat to see Shinano in her original planned BB configuration added to the game, or the 4th/5th Yamato class ship as a premium. What do you guys think? I feel that due to the unpopularity of CV's and how impractical it is to implement the CV Shinano i'm predicting she'll be added ingame as battleship instead. If she is this is what she possibly could look like. Her secondaries include the 10 cm/65 Type 98 naval guns for secondaries, and two 20 cm triple barrel turrets like that of the Zao. Gameplay wise i'd predict she'd be a brawler unlike her sisters while having a very beefy secondaries alike to that found on Ohio/Georgia/Mass. Thoughts?

Wow, this is sounding worse and worse. I'll stick to my IJN torp DD line. lmbo

Personally I don't think this will break the game, unless they unrealistically buff either the speed or damage of the torpedo's. Subs back then were SLOW, subs could only travel 18-22 knots on the surface and 6-9 knots submerged and they only had 2-6 torpedo tubs on the front. I predict it will be less breaking the game and more WG wasting time and resources on something people will not find fun or playable. I myself will be sticking with DD's since I can stealth torp already with a DD and sail 35+ knots instead of being in a sub that can fire far less torps at once, while only being able to travel 8 freaking knots while a DD is chasing me and dumping depth charges on my hull.

Don't you have a Walmart to shoot up, or a crowd for you to run your car into?

You sound mad, do you need a milkshake to lighten up the mood?

Yes, of the states they could of used to name either the Georgia or Ohio. Why on Earth would they name either ship after those states, especially the Ohio after they named the Tier IX premium US BB Georgia? The Georgia left me a feeling a bit awkward but not bothered by afterwards, but i'm honestly very startled they'd go ahead and name the following US premium BB Ohio out of all the options they had available.

Is there a particular reason why Wargaming is naming the next US premium BB the Ohio? Just as we got the Georgia as is, considering the politics that is going on in both those states in regards to women's rights it's in really bad taste to have two USN premium BB's named after Georgia and Ohio.

Add Shinano yes, but not as a CV. But as a BB.