Jump to content

SireneRacker

WoWS Wiki Editor
  • Content Сount

    7,845
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    6889
  • Clan

    [DAKI]

Community Reputation

2,367 Superb

About SireneRacker

  • Rank
    Rear Admiral
  • Birthday August 21
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    The lonely German corner in the Wiki Office
  • Interests
    Military history (anything before 1990), no matter where and when. Technical details, strategies and more are always good to know.

Recent Profile Visitors

6,321 profile views
  1. SireneRacker

    Premium Carrier Review (Part One): Introduction

    When you have a ship with equal performance level as a tech tree version, you still maintain the economical benefits through Credit and Captain XP grinding.
  2. SireneRacker

    Ship of the Week: T7 Cruisers - 18th to 25th

    Since I got both Boise and Nuevo de Julio, I'll enter for the camos with a ship I haven't seen here so far. A shame, considering that she is among the most exciting Cruisers out there, not as boring as Shchors or Payfast.
  3. SireneRacker

    I feel Yukikaze is a bit of a wasted opportunity.

    I actually would've prefered if WG gave her her late-war refit, meaning the loss of a turret but with more AA guns installed. The model exists, we had it when Kagerou was a T9. So in that regard it's not a problem. The loss of firepower would then justify some buffs at other points, which overall would make this appearant loss a gain.
  4. SireneRacker

    WG, you need to fix MM NOW

    And your idea throws others under the bus. Your attempt to fix a problem creates more problems. Shall I list them again? If you cannot take criticism to your ideas, particularly that which is valid, then I recommend you stay off the Forums and instead talk to a mirror.
  5. SireneRacker

    WG, you need to fix MM NOW

    You clearly fail to understand even the simplest of things, or are playing dumb. Or both. The only one here who associates gameplay experience with the desire to win is you. You are once again making things up, though I shouldn't be surprised by that.
  6. SireneRacker

    WG, you need to fix MM NOW

    So since you have nothing constructive to provide for the conversation, you rather want to make things personal. That is one way to admit that you ran out of arguments, with your pride preventing you from facing reality. Keep going.
  7. SireneRacker

    WG, you need to fix MM NOW

    I know that there will be a negative impact. I can back my point with logic that you can not refute. You pull out excuses out of thin air hoping to make a point. Excuses which btw are false. Gameplay experience is not related to success. People can and do play games to have fun. Sucking out their fun with the justification "they won't care anyway because 30% WR" is nothing short of arrogant.
  8. SireneRacker

    WG, you need to fix MM NOW

    So you want to throw them under the bus despite knowing the negative impact of your ideas, while calming yourself saying that they likely won't be bothered anyway? In moments like these I lit a candle and thank the lord that you are not making game decisions. And trust me, I do that.
  9. SireneRacker

    WG, you need to fix MM NOW

    And without you actually knowing what's going on. I can always willingly select my gamemode. But can I select my MM bracket? That comes on top. The one option that somewhat reduces the impact of the different leagues is making more leagues, which however will increase queue times drastically.
  10. SireneRacker

    WG, you need to fix MM NOW

    That is a rather bad idea. You would create more problems than it would solve. Imagine how a 30% player will experience the game once he improves, and gets out of that bracket. From being one of the top in his league, bam, he'll turn into cannon fodder once he plays ith the "regular" players. Not to mention that there will be differences in meta.
  11. SireneRacker

    WG, you need to fix MM NOW

    Actually there are some good indicators. Like this chat announcement of consumable usage. When your Worcester for example instantly radars and hydros once the battle starts, you can guess how experienced/skilled he is with relatively high accuracy.
  12. SireneRacker

    WG, you need to fix MM NOW

    Skill based MM, aka how can we punish people who actually do well?
  13. SireneRacker

    What are the odds...

    I do have to question your censoring technique though. On the second picture you censored the ship icon instead of the name [edited]?
  14. SireneRacker

    Does Roma Have Depth Charges or Mines on board?

    She wouldn‘t be the only capital ship with depth charges. During her trials Tirpitz carred two depth charge racks, and also used them. Needless to say they were deemed impractical, and were removed.
  15. SireneRacker

    Name the ship you think is worthless....

    I have eaten wax by mistake once, because a German cheese used to be packed in wax that looked like it was edible. Was only told afterwards that I was supposed to unpack it. Drinking something that is way too hot happened to basically everyone, so combining the two I can speculate with relative certainy how it would feel.
×