-
Content Сount
2,629 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
7593 -
Clan
[SWFSH]
Community Reputation
1,471 SuperbAbout Fast_Battleship_Iowa

-
Rank
Lieutenant Commander
- Birthday March 11
- Profile on the website Fast_Battleship_Iowa
- Insignia
Profile Information
-
Location
USA
WG
-
Position
---
Recent Profile Visitors
-
Recommend a higher tier Russian trainer.
Fast_Battleship_Iowa replied to handybilly's topic in General Game Discussion
Moskva gets my vote. She doesn't need a high point captain to work, though her playstyle as a large cruiser makes her a bit unusual. I've used her to train up both cruiser and BB captains for Russian ships. -
Fast_Battleship_Iowa changed their profile photo
-
Iwami is for TROLLS
Fast_Battleship_Iowa replied to ElCuervoJones's topic in General Game Discussion
This theory could really be applied to any tier, and prior to tier IX ships being sold, was frequently brought up for tier VIIIs. Not just in WoWS, but in other titles such as WoT. It's improbable that Wargaming will add this. -
players say one more time...
Fast_Battleship_Iowa replied to derf_20's topic in General Game Discussion
I don't disagree here. The range of sub detection with hydro should be higher than it presently is. -
They struggle to deal with subs that are submerged, which is where 95% of submariners are going to head when they fear detection or are detected. Aviation battleships don't have any tools to deal with submarines either, or at least Ise does not.
-
Premiums that are so bad that is funny?
Fast_Battleship_Iowa replied to XVirtusX's topic in General Game Discussion
Huanghe I do not enjoy. That creeping smoke screen sounds good on paper, but the reload is punishing and the DPM on the ship overall is quite poor. I could never really get mine to work. It used to have great AA but... times have changed. -
Need some help troubleshooting my PC
Fast_Battleship_Iowa replied to SaltyRat's topic in General Game Discussion
From this post I would try a few things: Restart your PC (I know, I know. But sometimes it works) Verify files of the game Check your firewall, I'm no expert when it comes to reading these error logs, but it looks like there's an issue with ethernet. If none of the above works, uninstall/reinstall. I stepped away from the game and didn't update it for a year. Updating it caused some severe stability and performance issues, which were only resolved with a clean install. -
Really what's happening is the testers are (shocker) usually very good players, and able to make even a statistically poor ship look like it's overperforming on the spreadsheet.
-
People quitting the game
Fast_Battleship_Iowa replied to SatansOilcan's topic in General Game Discussion
I'd compare it to sports. Every sports team has a bad season, yet fans will still tune in and watch their team lose, again and again, because they want to be a "part" of the win. I feel like something similar happens to games, especially ones people grow up liking but become increasingly bitter towards as the game changes. -
Legendary Upgrades - Worst Nightmare for new players
Fast_Battleship_Iowa replied to aPr0tector's topic in General Game Discussion
Why is this? Mostly .. because Wargaming decided to make it so. I am not a fan of the changes to legendary mods that were made either, the old mission system was far superior and an achievable reward for obtaining tier 10. I am not a fan of their move into the research bureau, the RB should've been added with its own rewards and should not have sucked in legendary mods with its arrival. -
What premium would you pick?
Fast_Battleship_Iowa replied to Avalon304's topic in General Game Discussion
Probably Georgia. Looks like a fun combination of 18" guns, speed and secondaries on the already proven & capable Iowa hull. -
Steel Ships Decision
Fast_Battleship_Iowa replied to Snoopys_Odyssey's topic in General Game Discussion
Incomparable for me and it's not even close. -
Separation of Economy from Camos Discussion Thread
Fast_Battleship_Iowa replied to Ahskance's topic in General Game Discussion
Cautiously optimistic with this one. Hope it pans out well. Seeing Missouri get her credit mod permanently affixed is nice though. Not a fan of the changes to the premium camouflages in terms of their service cost reduction, but maybe it doesn't matter & I can't do the math to tell. -
Hey wargaming I would love it if you could add the USS The Sullivans to the game
Fast_Battleship_Iowa replied to blackpanther339's topic in Player Feature and Gameplay Suggestions
I'd love to see an event for the Sullivan in the style of the one done for Texas, where a portion of profit goes towards the museum ship. The Sullivans gets donations & we get a ship. -
Very sad to see the way wargaming is heading
Fast_Battleship_Iowa replied to Majika's topic in General Game Discussion
It used to be possible prior to the removal of team damage. You can still grief in some ways, but it's certainly more difficult. -
Very sad to see the way wargaming is heading
Fast_Battleship_Iowa replied to Majika's topic in General Game Discussion
It's likely you're misinterpreting this. As an example, a player deliberately griefing someone because they are a popular streamer in World of Warships could count as a violation.