Jump to content

Petrishnikov

Members
  • Content Сount

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    13845
  • Clan

    [SEC_8]

Community Reputation

45 Neutral

About Petrishnikov

  • Rank
    Seaman
  • Insignia
    [SEC_8]

Profile Information

  • Location
    En route to Iscandar

Recent Profile Visitors

223 profile views
  1. Petrishnikov

    Your best Co-op Game(s) / Stats

    Hard carry in CO-OP today. Was in a battle where pretty much our whole team died. Just me and the CV left. I pinged him for help but he left the game thinking we were going to loose. So I had to sink 5 ships myself, the last two being the red Jean Bart and the MASS. Had to sink both of them due to our lack of points. They were chasing me all around the map, but I was able to sink them both with 17 secs to spare... OMG, I thought CO-OP was suppose to be relaxing... *sheesh* P.S. This is just base points, no booster signals or special camo... except the premium camo that comes with Jean Bart that is.
  2. Petrishnikov

    Wichita: Bruiser Cruiser

    Well, that I will agree with sir
  3. Petrishnikov

    Wichita: Bruiser Cruiser

    Development cost is not that high when you can just 'tweek' and existing ship (Baltimore) and sell it for an un-godly amout... pleeeese!
  4. Petrishnikov

    Premium ship prices a bit too premium?

    Sell 1 watch for $1,000,000 or 1,000,000 watches for $1, either way you get $1,000,000 only difference with the latter is you have more people with your 'watches (WITCHes)' that will buy additions (consumables) for it. You really need to rethink your business model WG, Either way, this whales wallet is closed indefinitely due to your poor business practices/decisions. And development cost is not that high when you can just 'tweek' and existing ship (Baltimore) and sell it for an un-godly amout... pleeeese!
  5. Petrishnikov

    10-15% drop in players since update?

    Believe it or not, with all the drama happening in Randoms and the CV fiasco I've been playing my Le Terrible in CO-OP. Run-and-gun is fun, no CV's to ruin your game and MM +1 I can deal with. Gotta look for the silver-lining wherever and whenever you can.
  6. Petrishnikov

    Wichita: Bruiser Cruiser

    Sell 1 watch for $1,000,000 or 1,000,000 watches for $1, either way you get $1,000,000 only difference with the latter is you have more people with your 'watches (WITCHes)' that will buy additions (consumables) for it. You really need to rethink your business model WG, Either way, this whales wallet is closed indefinitely due to your poor business practices/decisions.
  7. Petrishnikov

    Out with the old, in with the new...

    Maybe because DD's, in general, are less expensive to 're-equip' than carriers so it behooves players to use booster (camo/flags) perks that cost an hence influences the purchase of said economic boosts.
  8. My theory is that WG realizes that the current player base who have been here 3+ years is "played-out" (gold mining term, when a vein of gold ore has been depleted). Players who have been in game for 3+ years pretty much have all the ships they want (tech-tree and premium) and are taking their sweet time in just playing and relaxing not bothering to spend on flags and camo (which I'm sure most of you have thousands of), or ship modules, which by this time you probably already have most of. And now that the "sleeper has awakened" (DUNE ref.) that WG is hiding behind their EULA concerning 'nerf-ing' of premium ships, they realize that revenue from this group will dramatically decrease due to angering the established player base. What WG wants are players that are hungry to get that next new tech-tree or premium ship and will spend doubloons for flags, camo and upgrades to get there as fast as possible. These are the kind of players WG wants more of; and how do you do that, by changing the old way and bring in the new. They will adjust the game (real reason for CV-rework) to fit the new 'younger' audience and make it more attractive. Also, by nerf-ng premiums we paid for with CASH to soften the assimilation of 'young-blood' into the collective. Last thing you want is a new player (innocent and ripe with potential cash) to jump into tier 5 and be clubbed over the head by a (so-called) OP GC. Concerns of the established/veteran community is not the priority to WG, though they put up a good façade of caring. Why would it be, they figure "we have your money already, you 'vantta' leave dasvidaniya!"). So, I don't think they are really too concerned with all our complaints about CV's or 'nerf-ing' of premiums. They just want 'new blood' because we 'old-timers' have finally wised-up and don't need to put up with WG's shenanigans. And since most of us will curtail or eliminate purchases of any kind indefinitely, their lackluster response is to be expected... Hey, it's just good business.
  9. Petrishnikov

    Wichita is finally on sale

    Sorry WG, I finally reviewed your EULA (in detail) and I can safely say, no more purchases from me... EVER!!!!
  10. Such a heated debate. I do appreciate all the viewpoints and civil responses. At the end of it all I do fear that WG has irreputably damaged the game and themselves by their business practice whether they are in their right or not. Oh, and the CV debacle does not help either... but that's for a different thread.
  11. Petrishnikov

    Huang He love fest

    I hate you!!!! Congrats!!!
  12. "What I don't appreciate is having the thing I purchased change after I purchased it. " I'm not saying they're not in their legal right to do so. On a side note, I do appreciate your civility @_WaveRider_ . Even though our viewpoints may differ.
  13. Look I'm not going to pretend that I would not intentionally buy an OP ship if I had the chance. I'm no white-knight by any stretch of the imagination. TBH, I did not know GC (or any ship for that matter) was OP when I purchased her. It was just enjoying my hobby and collecting ships. What I don't appreciate is having the thing I purchased change after I purchased it. They want to change it, fine. Give me my MONEY back. Do not misunderstand. I want WoWs to proposer and new players to come into the game and have an enjoyable experience. I just don't want to be penalized for WGs mistake (and greed).
  14. Saipan (and to a lesser degree Enterprise), in its current state, should be tier 6.
  15. That's is fine and I'm not disputing the EULA. All I'm saying is that it is not in their best fiscal interest to continue down this course. You speak of balance, but nothing precluded anyone of purchasing any of these so-called OP'ed pixel boats when they had the chance.
×