Spartias

There were several times in the old RTS days that I would push a heavy AA build to center map and dominate the air for my friendly CV. Normally I did this when my CV was statistically incompetent. I'd tell them to fight over me, which was center map, and by doing so I'd kill a ton of red planes and they'd inadvertently spot for both flanks properly. You could do stuff like this to defeat a superior red CV. It was counter able. There were options even if the red CV was far better. Just... most people couldn't figure out how to do the thing where you'd actually spec for AA...

Sounds like a latency issue, not an fps issue.

I miss RTS CV's...

A lot of t6 and T8 ships were real fighting ships, and stood a chance of engaging each other in real life. Heck, the Texas at t5 was active in both world wars. It was entirely possible that if conditions had been right that she could have faced off against Bismarck, Tirpitz, Nagato, Myoko, even Yamato. I was so disappointed when they made it impossible for her to face off against the Bismarck. Creating those lopsided battles that never happened, but could have... is really fun. (Plus extra XP)

Relegate CV spotting to the minimap only. CV damage feels pretty light to a lot of the average CV players, but to the average surface ship player it feels enormous. I'd wager a good chunk of that comes from a lot of the extra surface ship damage coming in due to the inadvertent spotting of the CV. Relegate CV spotting to the minimap, and you'll end up with CV players that don't feel nerfed, and surface ship players that receive less incoming damage, and can focus more on just defending themselves from air attack. Go ahead and show broadside, that fleet over there can't see you.

I'd have to check. I'm not sure. I haven't really had time recently to work on side projects like this. Hopefully I will soon.

It used to, however I haven't had time.to keeping updated in the past six months. Likely does not work properly.

Have I gotten the value out of the camo? Yes. Does it bother me that they're doing this? No. Can I empathize with those that take offense to the lack of consistency this shows? Yes. A move like this suggests a lack of value seen by WG in purchases by veterans and is seeking new dollars without enforcing the value of previously spent dollars. Have players gotten a fair bit of value from their purchase in this situation? Yeah most probably have, but it doesn't build confidence. And WG is definitely facing a veteran confidence issue, fairly earned or not.

If you care enough to improve, why should you care if others think you should or shouldn't play? If you care enough to try and improve, you're already lightyears ahead of most.

I really miss RTS CV days...

It was wicked hard to get good at pre-rework CV. They were super lethal, but it was completely possible to counter them because AA was equally as lethal if specced into. However, since they were so difficult to get good at, very few took the time to do that. This left a vacuum between the few incredibly good CV players and the few horrible CV players. It was a toss up as to which you'd get on your team. The low population meant most players wouldn't spec into AA, meaning they couldn't effectively counter CV's, despite being fully capable of doing so on many ships. This led to vitriol, which led to the rework. Edit: Full honesty: I'm a pre-rework unicum CV player. However I'm also one of the ones that completely abused the old Saipan and made a lot of people's lives miserable... my bad...

TLDR Balance is key.

If CV spotting was relegated to the minimap, AA would naturally take less damage through less incoming shell fire.

Can you maintain that increased PR as you move up the tiers and increase in battle count though? 100 battles is statistically nothing. PR and win rate don't really mean much until you're approaching the 1,000 battle count.