Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles


Community Reputation

22 Neutral

About Gnevsie

  • Rank
    Petty Officer
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

374 profile views
  1. Submarines and WOWS.

    I shall refer to this thread as - Submarine thread #24491 Heresy detected.
  2. Probably shouldn't rely on iChase btw~ @lemekillmister he isn't exactly a reliable source of information as of late ... nor is any CC or ST, because *WIP* Perhaps its best to just ... wait? instead of jumping the gun? Regardless - gotta love how personal you lot get concerning a vessel you know hardly nothing about. =/ How about stopping the whole personal attacks and the like as well?
  3. This ^^ Since when did doing anything become suddenly a 'You tried! So here, have your reward' - The whole point behind a competitive environment is ... the competition and sorry but 'participation rewards' do not foster growth, infact if you'd do a small google search, you might find out that offering 'participation rewards' doesn't just stagnate individual growth, but negatively effects individual growth. If you can get a reward just by participating ... what exactly would the incentive be? to get another participation reward? Sorry - but as previously stated by so many and TheHolySpork - Competitive games are not and never will be about 'Equality' - after-all, what would be the point in any game if the entire premise of the game was to merely 'participate' - why would anyone bother to improve there skills? why would anyone bother to grow as an individual? sorry but, 'equality' will only exist via society, and in terms of what its use via society will be, of course in this particular scenario its ... equality of opportunity. You have the exact same opportunity as any other person here to grow, to improve upon your skill in winning in a competitive environment. @AkiyamaSaneyuki_2017 I honestly find people like you to be horrid individuals, as instead of allowing individuals, such as children to be competitive in there own ways, to grow in there own unique ways - to perhaps learn what they themselves have a talent for, you'd rather tell them to NOT seek out that information, NOT seek out self-improvement, but instead ... to teach children to stagnate, because ... what motivation does a child have to get better at whatever he or she is good at, if every child received a 'participation reward' - so, you'd rather reward a child for perhaps, not trying his or her best, for perhaps cheating instead, but .. hey they participated correct? so we should motivate them to instead to merely participate, as they'll receive a reward for simply participating ... causing a release of endorphins into the childs brain, gradually getting the child hooked on merely participating ... the child in question wont ever try to push themselves further, wont ever try to improve themselves further ... after-all, why would they when they can just 'participate' Lets apply this infact to my own childhood experience, when I was [edited] - if say, for example I was given 'participation rewards' for merely being apart of group therapy ... do you think I would be where I am today? alive and kicking, sure I'm still broken, but ... I'm also still striving to be the best version of myself that I can push for, that I can try and fight for, why is that? maybe its because as a child, I was rewarded with praises and not just that but growth and self-motivation. With how you seem to teach kids, not too sure the kids in question will want to push past merely 'participating' ... rather than motivating themselves to go further and further and further. Whats this called? its called GROWING UP. It's called MATURING. Its called BECOMING AN ADULT. So, yea no ... no participation rewards for you or anyone, because its unhealthy, especially for a childs delicate and fragile mind. Btw - we have social welfare, not because its a 'cold world' - but because, converting that individual into a productive individual in society is both good for the individuals mental and physical health, but also good for the society and economy as a whole, at-least thats what its SUPPOSED to be used for ... but yea, thats gone to pots hasn't it?
  4. Lower the boat! - and in his name, so shall Tirpitz have her red panties hidden more efficiently - just as he desired. o7 In his honour, we should work on flooding the MM with Tirpitz.
  5. Battleships against destroyers

    Real? this game has never attempted to be 'Real' - the only things even remotely resembling 'real' would be the ship models themselves, but the scale of ships is way off. Infact, by WG scale - a battleship is a kilometre long. Battleships existed as a projection of force, big slow beasts with big guns that could reach out and touch, but its primary use was ... projection. In WoWS, Battleships again exist to punt cruisers, cruisers exist to punt destroyers, destroyers exist to punt battleships aaannd the cycle goes on, see how that works? If a battleship could easily destroy a Destroyer in a single hit every time, all the time - then whats the point in playing a Destroyer? then whats the point in playing a Cruiser? after-all ... the main reason why a Cruiser would be desirable ... is gone, because the battleship can do its job better if all it took was a single big [edited]shell, so everyone would just play battleships. Wargaming only tries to get close to 'reality' when it comes to the ships ingame Models ... thats it. If we want realistic warships, we wouldn't have HP - HE wouldn't set fires on the decks, on metal ships. Most of our shots would miss ... all the time, we'd rarely ever score a hit and when we do, it could very easily just cripple the ship for the rest of the game, which by the way even if they scaled the battles still, would last for HOOOUUURS. We wouldn't have consumables either, because ... don't think ships had consumables in WW1 or 2 did they? no captain skills either! Jist is, Shin_Gouki - this isn't a simulator, its just an arcade game, an arcade game with ships.
  6. *Le Gaspa* It would seems, dat Gnevsie has returned >;3

  7. Why the hell are people saying he insulted WG Staff? or Threatened staff. WATCH THE DAMN VIDEO PEOPLE! Whilst I might not watch his content, at-least I wont put the blame on him simply because I disagree we with him, this is damn childish. HE NEITHER STATED A THREAT NOR INSULTED WG FACULTY! What he did do was voice his opinion about firing a WG Employee for incompetence on the job, why? because selling people an unfinished product is just wrong, plain and simple, there is no way to aggrandise it as a great idea, or to NOT say whomever decided to release an unfinished product for almost $80 is incompetent.
  8. *Sigh* the issue is dionkraft, unlike Spo ... oooooooooooo ...ooooooon! *gasp* said. We aren't dealing with a company that listens when you make nice talk about how great they are, infact they'll bend over backwards for shills unfortunately, but you dare give a negative review, they'll ignore it, blatantly so, ignore the information provided by supertesters. Which pushes people to get heated, to be far more rash, then and only then will WG respond, by trying to completely silence Foch for example, thankfully they didn't go to the same lengths with iChase.
  9. In my honest opinion, some people in WG should be fired - but that is purely my Opinion, it is in no way a threat, merely my and many others OPINION. As for his statements towards WG, yes they are entirely valid, someone made a choice to put an unfinished premium ship up for sale, knowing that is unfinished and in a bad state, effectively selling an unfinished product for almost $80 WG have clearly displayed they cannot handle a volunteer having an opinion that does not align with the usual 'everything about WG is great!' and then promptly ignoring any suggestions regarding the subject at hand, that being the vessel itself - whilst also punishing dissent. People need to stop looking at players as though they truly have no right whatsoever to critic a game they're playing, that they have no right to judge. The only reason why WG can operate this game is because WE, the PLAYERS, play it, we aren't just nameless cattle for them to milk and abuse like they have been for quite awhile now.
  10. Rights

    l.m.a.o, they removed him due to a bogus reason ... he 'threatened' an employee, right so in wargamings 'OPINION' its a threat to have an OPINION about WG Employees. So, guess that means WG threatened ichase in return? kek, such failure to logic WG.
  11. Why are people saying 'he threatened wargaming employees' ... why are WG saying that?! He threatened no one. Simply saying they should be fired, is NOT in anyway a THREAT, as such iChase did NOT threaten anyone Threat: A statement of an intention to inflict pain, injury, damage, or other hostile action on someone in retribution for something done or not done. It's called an OPINION - not a threat. Or what? is having an opinion now a defacto threat? don't be moronic.

    While realism in my mind would be awesome, it just wouldn't work with World of Warships, as its an arcade styled game, not a simulator - that belongs to WT, but even then WT wont implement even destroyers. So, sorry my friend, but realism will never come to this game, I'd simply be happy if they'd realise how torpedoes work and that a torpedo hitting the side of a ship, at a severe angle will not detonate, it'll harmlessly bounce off.