Jump to content


Beta Testers
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan


Community Reputation

599 Excellent

About Treediagram

  • Rank
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Interests
    Torpedo is a great communicator

Recent Profile Visitors

2,303 profile views
  1. according to Dev QnA some months ago, yes apparently 50% of players use it. SGM 3 is useful on some ships like french cruisers
  2. Tier VIII Cleveland

    You get fully upgraded ship of former corresponding tier. In other words check your pensacola
  3. if nothing happens, I suppose on wednesday as usual
  4. They also said multiple collabs are Asia only in the past. If not at least ARP was supposed to be Asia only but it came over here. I suppose every server will get it.....
  5. Thanks for rewards! Although I couldn't play much it was very fun to participate as a corgi captain to give anyone free gifts! Just out of curiosity, does random crates with epic chance mean higher chance to get super crate?
  6. How to fix US CV

    I CV myself and was CV main. You can gladly look up my stats to see whether I have clue about CV or not. I raise you my div mate's Lexington to show Lex has no issue to deal damage or to win or even to shoot down planes. All 54 battles were played after rework. Lexington 8 CV USA 57 75.44% 116,390 2,399 10.4 1.6 25.6 84% 0% 0% 1,959 I can also show you my Ranger which was played during 111 time which is weaker than current 112 set-up Ranger 7 CV USA 38 63.16% 75,801 1,708 5.9 1.2 21.3 79% 0% 0% 1,585 Before we get into more stat shaming. The conclusion is that the problem is not the CV itself but it's the people who don't get clue how to CV. Yes Lexington will suffer against a good AS shou or good CV player with fighter skills but she is still quite powerful if you use her properly.
  7. How to fix US CV

    .....I'm speechless You guys need to learn how to CV properly. Former USN Strike or AS loadout is straight out stupid and it's good that they removed them If you can't win fighter battles in Essex vs Taiho or Midway vs Hak, your fighter skill is very likely questionable. You are more in numbers (10 vs 14) and you have more ammunition and stronger strafe fire power. If you can't use that to make yourself advantage, of course you lose. USN CV now became a lot more stable in terms of every aspect. The only problem is most player refusing to adapt to the new load out. After rework USN CVs received following buffs: Bogue - straight out better load out (111) than old ones Indy - More durable DB Ranger, Lex - Questionable load out such as 202 and 013 got removed. 112 is way balanced and is perfectly capable of dealing lot damage. Btw Lexington with AP bomb has potentially more damage capability than Enterprise Essex - 212 has less firepower compared to former 113 strike load out, but now you can actually compete against Taihou for air control and deal damage at the same time Midway - imo borderline OP
  8. You are quite underestimating the Baguette AP. Gascogne's and Richelieu's AP pen is 2nd best among tier 8 15" guns followed by Germans and then Monarch (First place is Roma) In fact it has very good drag value thus it maintains fair amount of penetration at longer range, surpassing even NC/Alabama/Massachusetts' 16" SHS AP at longer range.
  9. I always take IFHE as my first tier 4 skill. While CE helps you for more survival or allows more stealth missions, you can still fight very efficiently without CE when you are positioned correctly and IFHE helps you to deal more damage. Yes you might sneak in and give a big punch of AP shell in a broadside cruiser but CE does not guarantee to let that happen everytime whereas IFHE guarantees you to do more raw damage every game
  10. For any CL, CE and IFHE is a must if you want to do proper damage. Alone that makes your remaining choices of 5 points very very ineffective to specialize yourself into something. E.g. Kutuzov would take PT, AR (or EM), DE, CE and IFHE. IFHE is a mandatory if you want to do proper damage to other ships. Now that's 14 point captain and you only have 5 skill points left. Say I want to build AA then I either have to chose for AFT+something 1 point skill or MFAA+ something 1 point skill or BFT+idk what seems favorable to spend 2 points depending on. So after building your ships to be able to compete with others, now you have less choice to pick your specialization. Let's take Charles Martel for example which doesn't need IFHE: You go with high tier standard cruiser build first PT, AR, DE, CE. That's 10 point captain. Now you can actually specialize yourself for something. You can take AFT+MFAA+DCCA for maximum AA or HA, Vigiliance, BoS, PM for more survivability, etc. Not only does IFHE give you total advantage over one without but it also restricts more personalized builds.
  11. Ofc by mandatory I mean ships that are affected by it.
  12. True, I mean there will be always the standard or optimized build for certain ships/classes/whatsoever. However the issue I see here in IFHE is that it's beyond what it should bring to the table. It's not like skill A is better than B in certain circumstances or vise versa thus. What IFHE does bring is a total superior over one who doesn't have it which is why I see problem. For an example: Preventive Maintenance and Priority Target is a good example imho. If you take PM, you are confident with yourself and watch out for players aiming at you but in case you make mistakes and get hit, it will be more forgiving. PT on the other hand doesn't lower the risk of getting hit but helps you to get better awareness thus giving you more chance to dodge. In this case whether you take PT or PM doesn't give you a total benefit compared to one who doesn't. Or how bout BFT and SE on DDs. Only because you have more 10% DPS or more health, doesn't put you superior over others or makes things possible that wasn't possible before (IFHE makes penning armors possible which is impossible without)
  13. Hey folks, I want to bring up issue about two captain skills. Inertia Fuse for HE Shells, Air Supremacy IFHE and AS. For those who doesn't know the skills: IFHE increases your HE's penetration by 30% and reduces fire chance by 1% on <140mm caliber and 3% on ≥140mm caliber. AS increases number of planes in fighter or dive bomber squadron by 1. So what's the issue with these skills? I mean they bring nice bonus. More HE pen => more damage. More planes => more Fighter DPS, More bombs. But the issue is that these skills are pretty much a must-have skill. It's like Situation Awareness in the past. For those who wasn't there at that time. Back in the old days, current warning for being spotted (Yes that triangle with exclamation mark when you are spotted) was a captain skill named Situation Awareness. It was a must have skill since it told you whether you were spotted or not thus giving you time to prepare for encounter or to stay alert. However WG at certain point made this skill activated by default without spending any captain skill points on it. Now the issue with IFHE and AS is that someone who has the skill outperforms the one without by a HUGE margin. E.g. a Cleveland with IFHE can penetrate armor up to 32 mm compared to 25mm without IFHE. That makes a lot difference between them. With IFHE you can pen upto tier 8+ BBs bow where as without IFHE you can only pen upto tier 7 BBs bow. So it forces you more or less to take the skill if you want to perform better guaranteed. Moreover it made some ridiculous relations between CL and CA. CLs were good fire starter and good DD hunter before IFHE came where as CAs did reliable HE raw damage. Now CLs are good in both starting fire AND doing raw damage. AS is also very problematic since Fighter with AS has a lot advantage over the other without AS. It gives you 25% DPS and Health boost for IJN tech tree fighters or 16.66% DPS and Health boost for USN tech tree fighters making this skill mandatory and giving a complete superior over the other without AS. As I told above, these skill are mandatory for certain ships because the gap between one having it and not having it is big. The whole point of current captain skill system was compared to the old one to give more flexibility however IFHE and AS goes against the flexibility. Both of these skills need rework.
  14. 2018 plan video?

    Hello, I want to ask a simple question for Devs: Are we going to have another annual plan video for 2018 as we did in past years so that we can hype in what we are expecting to see? inb4 2018 will be the year of carrier
  15. Excessive US CV hate: Independence

    Indy's 111 and even Rangers 111 is (was) perfectly fine damage capability wise. The only problem they have is that they are freaking unforgiving to new players and as well as for CV mains making mistakes. And if you consider most CV players have no clue how fighter techniques or proper manual drop works (hence the reason many USN CV players took either AS or Strike instead of most balanced stock load out) that's the reason they whine: They can't simply left click enemy planes to death with 2 FT nor can they left click delete poor tier 5,6 BBs with 1 TB 3 DB squadrons as they used to do.