Jump to content

Santana2sff

Members
  • Content Сount

    34
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

Community Reputation

17 Neutral

About Santana2sff

  • Rank
    Seaman
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

449 profile views
  1. Santana2sff

    Stop. Blaming. Wargaming/Lesta.

    Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. ... It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. ... A business that makes nothing but money is a poor business.
  2. Santana2sff

    They have a week to think it over but then so do we...

    Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. ... It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. ... A business that makes nothing but money is a poor business.
  3. Santana2sff

    To CC's: Are you leaving too? ((07 to CC's))

    Predators have no interest in sharing dollars with anyone. The business model they follow is flawed. Can the community change it absolutely. I understand the revolution will not be televised! They know they have confirmed that in THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA they cannot continue business as usual.
  4. Santana2sff

    To CC's: Are you leaving too? ((07 to CC's))

    i HEAR TALK OF A PLAYER COMMUNITY BOYCOTT IS THERE ANY TRUTH TO THAT.? [edited] HERE I COME.
  5. On top of all of this, there is probably only about 20% of the player base that cares about any of this, and that's most likely being very generous in the number of people that care. In the end none of this will matter in a few weeks but it says a lot about this game, its player base, and its CCs (former). I don't think that Flamu and the rest of the former CC's have to give up their coverage of the game. I like Jingles and his videos. Yes they continue to make money. However the issue is really the predatory business model that Wargaming follows and adheres to at the expense of the player community. The game can be better, the player base knows it, but Wargaming is only into deceptive business practices. If the former CC's stopped streaming then the player base would not know, would not be as informed as it is thanks to the good work by Flamu, I Chase, Jingles, LWM, and Notser and the others that those issues come to light. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. I look forward to comments from all of the the former CC' s .Good work should be rewarded, so if they make money by streaming no harm done. I like Flamu, his videos, his knowledge of the game, his love of the game, he wants to shine light on how it could be made so much better. We owe him a debt of gratitude. Radio Free Europe did not stop broadcasting because Eastern Europe was Communist; no; they continued broadcasting allowing the people, and the world community to be informed. There is something to be said to exposing fraudulent predatory business practices. God knows Wargaming is one of the weirdest anomalies out here. Total dysfunction. Total disregard for the community, and of course no moral character whatsoever. Let there be light, let there be debate, let there be exposes. The more the merrier.
  6. Santana2sff

    feedback on the game in 2021

    Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. ... It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. ... A business that makes nothing but money is a poor business.
  7. Santana2sff

    PTS 0.10.6

    You are so correct, but then again ask yourself when has WOW been realistic about rewarding players for anything? They do however expect you to pay for just about everything, and then some. They seriously need to work on the business model, they are driving players away not only from the test server but also from the regular random battles. I have been complaining about their reward structure for years. Instead of improvements we get more dilution, and more "EXPLPLOTATION", I'm not not harsh at all. Ask yourself even if you owned 200 ships, you would think any business would reward customer loyalty. I got a flag, with no added value whatsoever it's all cosmetic. It also looks like emblem for 200 ship owners their graphics department must have had a day off, it is so embarrassing what a dismal emblem. Christmas containers, a total ripoff. It goes on and on, we have choices obviously not to play the game and go to [edited]. At least their graphics are kick [edited], the sea looks like the sea and not an ice skating ring like war of WOW. Sorry for the diatribe but you try to be loyal and you get it up the Whazoo. Earth to WOW is there anyone out there with ears>
  8. Santana2sff

    Gratitude From WOW Where is it?

    Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. ... It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. ... A business that makes nothing but money is a poor business.
  9. Santana2sff

    I have lost confidence in Wargaming

    Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. ... It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. ... A business that makes nothing but money is a poor business.
  10. End of Battle music should at least change. It's been the same for years. But I think Wargames will only change it if the community pays for it.
  11. Santana2sff

    Gratitude From WOW Where is it?

    This camo offers the same bonuses as the standard camo (which only costs 5000 doubloons.) Any value you place over that is purely aesthetic. Correct perhaps not pay to win let me correct my comment. Purely aesthetic. My question then would be is it ethical? Irrespective of your comment" You don't have to bid". I know that as well. The greater issue I would add is the overall treatment of the overall "Community". In terms of rewards. Maybe you can elaborate more, since I'm not political, but I did want to hear from the player base.
  12. Worcester Sharks: Eagles Camo 7000 doubloons Minimum bid: My God, I said to myself makes you wonder if it's not time for World Of Warships, and Wargames to study a bit their business model. I have never seen such a blatant attempt to to pay to win. Profit, for any corporation is encouraged, companies are in business to make a decent profit. However outright manipulation and wholesale exploitation of an entire community should not be a part of a business model for any Corporation. Paying a fair price for goods and services is something all of us day to in our daily lives. But I ask you the player base of you feel paying 7000 doubloons as a minimum bid is a fair for a camo? I started thinking so as not to be cynical I own about 204 ships, I paid what I would consider a fair price in year 2, and year 3 of Wargames. Suddenly price of ships went to $77.00 U.S for a destroyer. I doubt if I will ever buy another ship ever again. I asked myself what has Wargaming given me in terms of reward for being a loyal member of the Community? I cannot think of anything in terms of gratitude for the player base ever given by Wargaming to the Community. Christmas containers that was a fiasco. July 4th auction a travesty. 8000 Doubloons for Moskva special camo. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. Sorrry for my venting I'm just frustrated at the level of greed without gratitude. What do you say am I just totally wrong? Let me know.
  13. Santana2sff

    Any update on what's happening with Notser?

    Notser; Best Wishes to you and your SO. It's a bad time for everyone due to Covid. Best Wishes nevertheless.Hang in there!!
  14. Santana2sff

    What causes these strange losing streaks?

    TI think they tip the scale as well. I have the worst record inall of WOW for sure. I guess my nature is too aggressive. I think if you're vocal your selected with extra thumbs on the scale. I believe that. I'll let you know if this coimment tipped the scale "again against me".
×