Sgt_Something_

The tradition of naming ships is always broken. Submarines now are named after states for example and Carriers after presidents and key politician. So, the tradition is short lived to be honest.

Before carriers, the tradition was capital ships (BBs at the time) were named after states. Personally, I don't like the idea of having any capital ship being named after one person. I was extremely disappointed when the next generation aircraft carrier was called the Gerald R. Ford-Class and not the America class because three years prior to the construction, CV-66 (USS America; Kitty Hawk Class) was sunk as a target.

It happens. Are you playing top tier?

Okay, I will leave them alone. Also, happy new year!

I don't know what people are complaining about. it was a lot more chaotic when you have 2 torpedo squads and 3 dive bomber squads destroying the Yamato under 10 seconds XD

Nothing to see here

The CVNs (nuclear-powered carriers) cost 58% more to maintain than conventional powered one it says from the text

Where did you get this?

TankStryker It was during the beta, he had his Essex. I was the 2nd person to be killed by him. What's really funny, he wasn't paying attention and our tier 7 carrier (forgot what ship) severely damaging his ship. He was later killed by a destroyer. If you saw his videos, they're pretty good. I looked up to him when I was playing my carriers.

I think it would be cheaper to make their own. The Kitty Hawk alone was a nightmare to maintain.

Refresh my memory again on parks

CV's op in this rework? Well, the fighters with the rockets can seriously damage destroyers

I hope it was a peaceful protest. Thank you for the stories.

Okay, IN-CONCLUSION! PINK IS JUST A SLAP ON YOUR WRIST, NOTHING TO FEAR HERE FOLKS