Jump to content

JSFWRX85

Beta Testers
  • Content count

    1,458
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    3208
  • Clan

    [90TH]

Community Reputation

261 Excellent

About JSFWRX85

  • Rank
    Lieutenant Junior Grade
  • Birthday 03/01/1985
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

2 Followers

Recent Profile Visitors

490 profile views
  1. Does it matter which gun is larger if both guns can penetrate the armor of the other tank? As for the engine, sure gasoline lights up, but despite this the Shermans did have low crew injury rates. Lower than British and Soviet counterparts.
  2. I agree, especially once the US joined the war. Had she been around and still causing havoc, i imagine the North Carolina would have been sent to track her down.
  3. based on what? The armor is comparable, the Mobility is comparable, the guns are comparable. Id probably give the US the edge on crew training and optics. As for the Sherman, watch the Chieftains video on "The Myths of American Armor" Specifically the part where he goes over crew survivability. Really dispels the myth the Sherman was a death trap.
  4. 1. P-51D 2. XXI 3. M4A3E8 / T-34-85 Im calling it a tie. 4. M1 Garand 5. That one that takes out what you throw it at 6. The one that fills your stomach 7. 1911 8. naughty nurse 9. Bradley
  5. Too many BBs is the problem

    ive played in games with no BBs and games with no DDs and the games with no DDs were far better IMO. People played far more aggressive.
  6. Is it necessarily a bad thing in the Colorado's case? Is the Colorado that special to play that we shouldnt risk essentially replacing it? Not in my opinion. I dont see posts on here about how great the Colorado is to play. Before the German line maybe, when the US were the choice for up close fights vs the IJN. But since then? To me, the US line has kind of been left behind at tier VII, i think an post refit WV would bring new life and you would see more US BB players at probably the best tier in the game.
  7. The Refit could work at Tier 7, sure her AA suit is superior to Colorado but so is Texas in regards to New York. So what if she ends up more powerful than her tech tree counterpart. Wouldnt be the first time.
  8. CV Rework Feedback

    in WG's defense i dont think the purpose of the rockets is Alpha damage, looks to be almost a guaranteed fire every time however. That might be their whole point, damage over time vs alpha
  9. CV Rework Feedback

    Will there be another video released to show the complete AA re-work? Im interested in seeing how Cruisers like Des Moines are going to look. Also how are catapult fighters going to work? Are they just going to remove 1 aircraft out of the incoming squadron?
  10. CV Rework, First Look

    The new re-worked AA system sounds awesome to, especially the visuals. Looks more like it did during the CBT
  11. CV Rework, First Look

    I like it, looks better than what we have now. I wish they didnt show it against bots, but hey. Beggers cant be choosers.
  12. Ill be running Massachusetts as my primary ranked ship. I really enjoy her over any other tier 8 BB, if i decide to switch it up, ill run Lo Yang or Kidd.
  13. not entirely unheard of, look at the Alaska Class, their guns are 12" but i believe perform on par with the 14" guns of the New Mexico Class
  14. I keep getting a message that states "Transaction Error" while moving captains between ships and also selecting a daily crate, which will then freeze my game. Update: Looks to be fixed now, i restarted both the games and the Wargaming Center and the problem appears to be fixed.
×