Jump to content

yamato6945

Members
  • Content Сount

    722
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    11511
  • Clan

    [VVV]

Community Reputation

164 Valued poster

6 Followers

About yamato6945

  • Rank
    Warrant Officer
  • Birthday 03/01/1989
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

2,210 profile views
  1. yamato6945

    Why did they get rid of odd teir cv?

    Let's all be honest the rework failed it was a mistake to begin with yet wargaming can't or won't admit it. Seriously when do CV's actually get fixed like you know undoing the rework and bringing back the odd tiered carriers you'll also have to recompensate players but hey it will restore some good will to the player base. So how about it @Femennenly think you can to the devs about it. You know fixing their mess
  2. yamato6945

    Why did they get rid of odd teir cv?

    Because it was apparently too much work to balance all the CV's in their failure of a rework despite what mouth pieces like fem say
  3. yamato6945

    Feedback and Thoughts Directly to Pigeon_of_War

    @Pigeon_of_War Pigeon any chance of fixing carriers and by fixing I mean undoing 8.0's "rework". Here's my reasons for asking and hoping 1. Goal. The stated goal was to INCREASE carrier play but with AA broken and the constant nerf's carriers have and will more then likely continue to receive carriers are in all likely hood not being played more they just aren't fun to play anymore. 2. Implementation. The fact that the rework led to the removal of odd tiered carriers just feels lazy to me like a conscious decision was made to do as little work as possible for the "rework" let's not forget you want players to grind more xp to reach higher tiers which will lead to faster burnout. It also has the added effect of having a much steeper learning curve since there's only one low tier cv and one mid tier cv to practice with now which again I thought the "rework" was supposed to fix this. 3.Solution. In my opinion the solution is undo the "rework" re-compensate the player base as a good will gesture bring back the old system and the odd tiered carriers and move Saipan and Kaga where they belong also I'm guessing the reason we haven't seen Indomitable yet is cause you guys are struggling to balance her well this would help.Yes some carriers will be overpowered and couldn't be sold anymore but they wouldn't be the first (cough Nikolai,Belfast and others cough) then you guys could take the time to develop a real fix for carriers you one that still makes them fun still keeps AA ships like Atlanta in the role they excel at. I meant at the end of the day that's what a game should be fun. 4. Closing anyway thanks in advance for reading Pigeon and please at least bring this up to the others on the development team please Fair winds and Following seas Pigeon
  4. The Cv "rework" was a stupid idea from the start honestly wargaming should just return CV's to pre 8.0 re compensate players move Saipan and Kaga BACK to tier 7 where they belong after reintroducing odd tier carriers. That's another thing that pisses me off only wargaming could possibly think removing HALF of something could make it better yes lets make progression take longer and burn players out faster while having the audacity to say with a straight face that the "goal'" of the "rework" is to increase CV play and introducing nerf after nerf to carriers yeah thats gonna make me want to play carriers more.
  5. yamato6945

    Your best Co-op Game(s) / Stats

    Gotta love Missouri
  6. Radar it's quite clear at this point our feedback means nothing your development teams implementation of 8.0 despite everyone telling you it wasn't ready and wargaming ignoring players and implementing it anyway proved that. How about instead of wasting time and resources on screwing up the game you actually add things players want like new ports that aren't part of an event. or releasing some of the premiums your sitting on like Yahagi or Viribus Unitis
  7. It seems like their bound and determined to run the game into the ground. It's always one step forward and five steps backwards with Wargaming honestly if this trend continues I won't be renewing premium time. first 8.0 which was pretty much the catalyst for the games downward spiral now stuff like this. And Wargaming's excuse is always we'll hotfix our broken mess as soon as we can how about just once we have a patch that doesn't screw things up for any class a patch that actually improves the game and add's something like new historic ports like Scapa Flow or implementing ships people have been waiting for like Yahagi or Viribus Unitis
  8. yamato6945

    The music thread

  9. yamato6945

    Feedback and Thoughts Directly to Pigeon_of_War

    @Pigeon_of_War Pigeon I have to say I like the new dynamic ports but I have a question outside of collab's will we ever get some new ones. the one's that currently exist have gotten kind of stale and i switch between port's monthly. My most wanted ports Scapa Flow (I mean come on London over Scapa why) Kure Bremerton Moving Pearl harbour anchorage to Ford Island (Battleship Row) Kiel Portsmouth anyway please give a look Pigeon and thanks in advance
  10. yamato6945

    The music thread

  11. yamato6945

    Your best Co-op Game(s) / Stats

    I love this boat she's a monster one of those kills was by Ramming a Mutsu
  12. yamato6945

    Future Plans for Aircraft Carriers

    So much this just undo the "rework" wargamings stated "reason"was to INCREASE CV play well that seems to have failed and they went and screwed everything up. Just undo the rework bring back the odd tier carriers put kaga and saipan back where they belong and recompensate players.
  13. yamato6945

    Do you have a GC?

    Had her since day 1 and love her
  14. yamato6945

    Your best Co-op Game(s) / Stats

    First game in Vladivostok
  15. yamato6945

    The music thread

    Ship girl pictured is USS Arizona
×