Jump to content
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles


Community Reputation

538 Excellent

About khaenn35

  • Rank
    Admiral of the Navy
  • Birthday 07/02/2002
  • Profile on the website khaenn35

Contact Methods

  • Yahoo

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

6,209 profile views
  1. Nerf Khabs gun damage.

    I can't get any other stats other than your total stats, at least from what I can see from my phone. And the overall stats are indeed 2 weeks and you have left them unaddressed.
  2. Nerf Khabs gun damage.

    Statistically speaking, Khabarovsk has, in two week statistics, a 54.7% Win Rate, the closest competitor to it being the still-new Z-52, at 53.4%. Even without rounding, that is a 1.3% difference between the highest and second-highest performing ships. Currently, the Moskva has in 2-week statistics a 50.7% Win Rate, the highest among all T10 Cruisers, and the Des Moines, the second-highest performing ship, has a 50.6% Win Rate. With rounding for this, the winrate difference is 0.1%. The Minotaur currently has a Win Rate of 50.0% (It's 49.99%, but seriously, just round it to 50). That's a difference of 0.7% between the best and worst-performing Cruiser, almost half that of the difference between the Khabarovsk and the relatively-new, unstabilized-statistics Z-52. Comparing the Khabarovsk in Win Rate with the currently highest performing, statistically-stabilized Shimakaze, the difference is a whopping 5.4%. There are indeed flaws with the argument, as you have said, but let's use a smaller sample size and something that could be deemed to be more or less reliable in many ways: Your Statistics. You are a premier WOWS player with an extremely high level of competence in playing ships, and can play most ships to their maximum potential. The T10 Destroyers you own are the Khabarovsk, the Gearing, and your brand, shiny and new Z-52 (Congratulations on another T10). You have a winrate difference between your Gearing and your Khabarovsk of approximately 4.9%, and a damage difference of more than 20,000. You, as of now, have an impressive 100% WinRate in your Z-52, with 5 battles in comparison to your 388 in your Khabarovsk, and yet, you have a slightly lower XP gain (2 XP points) than the Khabarovsk. Even considering the fact that you might have had more premium time in the Khabarovsk, and the fact that you might be still getting used to the Z-52, the fact that you have an XP gain slightly higher/equal to in the Khabarovsk that you have a lower Win Rate in than the Z-52, shows that in each match you are, on average once your stats stabilize, more likely to gain more XP in the Khabarovsk than in the Z-52 (so you do indeed have a larger impact on the match), showing how, according to your personal experience, you seem to perform better in the Khabarovsk than in your other T10 DDs. The argument above is even more flawed, but you are a player, an elite player, currently stating that the Khabarovsk is equal to other Tier 10 Destroyers, though your personal statistics seem to state otherwise.
  3. "Cap'n, I think we found Atlantis!"
  4. Grats to the winners, wanted to participate and actually wrote up a script, but I didn't submit it because it was too "fanciful" and I'm too young to participate in it.
  5. The thing is... I've demounted basically all the mods I need from my ships during the free-demounts season. I have 4 concealment system mods. Four.
  6. Nice. Missed a Solo Warrior due to points by a mere 1 ship in the Montana.
  7. Indeed, but one should never rely on fire damage on CAs or DDs. Fire damage is based on health percentage, plus, with fire chance being less reliable than HE pen damage, and with fires being a good reason to use DC on cruisers without Repair, this is a rather good buff to Cruisers either way.
  8. That is inaccurate. The date shows on the log 2017-8-11, which most likely means the 8th of November. The screenshot shows 09.11.2017, the 9th of November. While there is the timezone thing, the sheer difference in hours makes it more likely that the screenshot was indeed in the future.
  9. The DDs are horrendous to the Kag, they focus it down like a Wolfpack. Makes it really unfun.
  10. Never got a 5 star, just multiple 4s. I admit I do horribly with the DDs, it actually feels like the hardest one with having to time Filth travel.
  11. Maybe start with the British Battleships?
  12. Where's the Union Jack Camo?

    Maybe, but put it on the Dreadnought. Remember to put God Save the Queen and Royal Oak screaming in the background.
  13. Hangout by the Sea

    *wraps arms around* *squeezes tightly, shaking* ... *slowly lets go, falling asleep*