-
Content Сount
121 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
14548 -
Clan
[BR-CA]
Community Reputation
15 NeutralAbout hardtodie
-
Rank
Chief Petty Officer
- Profile on the website hardtodie
-
Insignia
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Prince George BC Canada
Recent Profile Visitors
1,312 profile views
-
-
takes for input people.
-
Well it has quite awhile since Wargamming.net announced that co-op battles would be a game mode. However nothing has been done until yesterday, when I observed that the number of players had increased, lord god it only took 4 years to do so. This is a start however there they need to do a lot more to make it compete. Suggestions: 1-increase the time it takes to complete a co-op battle(add more ships if that's what it takes)! 2-Make sure the bots supplied take a active part in the outcome of the battle and do not act like they do now. 3-increase the amount of monetary and elite commander experience per game. 4-treat co-op players the same as players who play any other mode in WoW. Not everyone can afford to play any other mode in WoW so, lets give the chance to enjoy the game and quite the discrimination.
-
Nice words WG on the apology. See if there is action.
hardtodie replied to jags_domain's topic in General Game Discussion
Been playing this game since 2013 and a have a navy of 90 ships tiers 1/10 and have played some 11000 games. I have spent the last hour reading posts on the subject and see nothing mentioned about the COST OF PLAYIING WORLD OF WARSHIPS! Over the past 3 or 4 years I have noticed a sharp increase in in-game thing's like gold, flags, premium time, coins, ships and the quality of the game play has decreased by the same amount. One reason for the sharp increase in the cost of playing the game is nothing more than GREED of WORLD of WARSHIPS. As a commander of the BC-CA clan our clan has been hit real hard by the introduction of submarines and the introduction the GREED PRINCIPAL NOW EMPLOYED BY WARGAMMING.NET. Last week my clan had 40 active players this morning it it has 29. After discussions with those who left majority sited the games to expensive to to play. Since I payed for the clan in gold there is some legal issues that need to be adressed. -
corvettes Royal Canadian Navy,corvettes
hardtodie replied to hardtodie's topic in Historical Discussions and Studies
Since 1 Sherman brought the subject of game problems I will make the follow statements: 1- The cost of flags in the game are absurd-9600 credits per flag and you only get 20. 2- The cost of Premium ships on web site are totally absurd. I was going to purchase a tier 8 premium ship until I seen the $456.00 Canadian price tag. To me the game play in not the problem- its that world of warships functions on a GREED NOT NEED POLICY. A LOT OF WORLD OF WARSHIPS PLAYER BASE CANNOT AFFORD THESE KIND OF PRICES. WHEN I BEGAN PLAYING ALMOST 6 YEARS IT WAS VERY COMMON TO SEE 34000 PLAYERS ON- LINE IN NA AT ONE TIME. FOR THE LAST WEEK I CHECKED THE MOST PLAYERS I SEEN WAS 9000. THIS DECLINE IS NOT CAUSED BY PROBLEMS WITH GAME PLAY. IN FACT IT IS CAUSED BY THE GREED OF ALL STAFF AT WORLD of WARSHIPS. WITHOUT PLAYERS THE GAME WILL NOT SURVIVE!!!!!!! -
corvettes Royal Canadian Navy,corvettes
hardtodie replied to hardtodie's topic in Historical Discussions and Studies
Understood thank for your input. -
corvettes Royal Canadian Navy,corvettes
hardtodie replied to hardtodie's topic in Historical Discussions and Studies
Ok. Since World of Warships lied to everyone about the implementation of submarines into game. What anti-submarine vessels are being planned to help combat the submarine threat (over the side depth ect.)? I can see why the player base has dropped considerably over the past 3/4 years! -
corvettes Royal Canadian Navy,corvettes
hardtodie posted a topic in Historical Discussions and Studies
For five years that I have played World of Warships never have I seen the 3rd largest navy in the world (RCN) represented in World of Warships. As Canadian I'am somewhat annoyed at this. Without the Royal Canadian Navy doing escort duty of ships headed to the United Kingdom and patrols in the North Atlantic Britain would now be a German State. The Royal Canadian Navy was also involved in in D-day- the and other significant naval battles of World War 2. However World of Warship still chooses to INSULT every Canadian who plays the game. I have the tier 7 Haida destroyer witch my father served on and it gives hope that maybe the developers will add some Canadian anti-submarine corvettes to the game -
What a bloody bunch of crap. I started playing 11950 games ago and matchmaking was a problem back then. After over 4 years of playing wows I'am still hearing about how matchmaking still has the same problems it had 4 year ago and a couple of new created by wows attempts to address original issues. The new issues I'am talking about are: 1- Bots 2- Imbalanced teams So lets discuss the the "bot" problem. Since I play all game modes WoWs has given me I would like to start coop mode. Since the introduction bots. I have noticed that the bots DO NOT TAKE AN ACTIVE PART IN THE BATTLE AS REGULAR PLAYER WOULD. IT IS MY EXPERIENCE THAT ALL THEY DO IS GO AND HIDE OR RUN IN REVERSE. THIS AFFECTS A REAL PLAYERS WIN - LOSS RATIO AS WELL. THE QUESTION NEEDING AN ANSWER IS WHY IS IT LIKE THIS? THE ANSWER IS QUITE SIMPLE- WORLD OF WARSHIPS MOTIVE IS PROFIT NOT PLAYER SATISFACTION.
-
Thanks 2 everyone for the input. Off to check the Dm
-
''''Hay Dr you ever had a tier 9 or 10 cruiser? In the 1st place the tier 9 Wooster only has a survive rate of 45 and secondly the repair costs are extremely high. This holds true for most tier 9 & 10 cruiser in the game. BY THE WAY DR THERE IS NO NEED TO INSULT ME IMPLYING I DO NOT KNOW HOW TO PLAY CRUISERS. The point I was making was that after the changes to the tech tree cruisers are seen less and less in the game.
-
Shocked is a understatement when playing cruisers in World of Warships! My game history is as follows: 1- 4 years of service to the game 2- over 11,000 games played 3- played all game modes except Clan battles 4- have tiers 1-10 except for cruisers of which I have NONE above tier 7. The reason for the low tier cruiser policy I adopted was brought on by the lack of game performance of cruisers tier 8 and above. I will use my tier 8 Cleveland as an example. My Cleveland was originally a tier 6 ship and then moved to tier 8. At tier 8 the ships build was done according to Wiki, the commander had 19 skill points and 200 games to it's credit. Shortly after it was moved to tier 8 the problem began. For the last 5 times I have played my Cleveland I have lost considerable amounts of coins (2000-20000). So I finally said enough is enough and sold it. My tier 9 cruisers suffered the same fate for the same reason. I therefor suggest that World of Warships rework the cruisers and restore them to there original glory they once held in the game. And remember why the game is still online!
-
Do you think its ok for Warships to charge people real money and after they purchased change the characteristic of the ship? yes?no
-
Start a Petition to Ban CV altogether instead of reworking them
hardtodie replied to Ratt35's topic in Aircraft Carriers
a rework will do fine -
Love the humor thanks. It is people who make life enjoyable