Jump to content

Xwing_Red1

Members
  • Content Сount

    1,093
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    6387
  • Clan

    [FDK]

Community Reputation

129 Valued poster

1 Follower

About Xwing_Red1

  • Rank
    Ensign
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    American Continent

Recent Profile Visitors

1,187 profile views
  1. Xwing_Red1

    Time for a slightly buff...

    Khaba with 12 km torps? Fine; But in exchange its armor and fire range should be nerfed.
  2. Xwing_Red1

    Time for a slightly buff...

    Maybe from 10.5 km to 11 km. 12 is no-no
  3. Xwing_Red1

    Time for a slightly buff...

    The 21.61 km buff is also meant to stay out a bit a form certain Cruisers that enjoy spamming HE. Plus, I dont see how The Grosser would hang back with a 21.61 range.
  4. *For Grosser's main battery maximum fire range. 20.61 km looks outdated. Yes, yes. I know that the ship is for "mainfights", but I dont see any logic that it keeps a 20.61 km rangr, specailly with the current meta: plus Bismarck, a tier 8 ship has a range of 21.21. I'd like so to suggest a slightly buff to Grossers fire range, from the current 20.61 km to 21..61 km, no more no less, It is a a tier X and deserves to have it's fire range incresased, in that way, it will also be differetne fro Fred's 20.32 km range. *Lastly, the other slight buff would be for Graf Spee's Secondary guns, from 4 km to 4.5 km, so it can be on pair with Nurnberg's secondaries range.
  5. Xwing_Red1

    Proposed buff for the Prinz Eitel Friedrich

    For the last time, it is not a Battleship
  6. Xwing_Red1

    Buyer Beware... Prinz Eitel Fredrich

    Certainly. But dont misundesrstand, Im only using de the word "light" as a synomy of "smaller" caliberber gun when comparing two different desings of BattleCruiser.
  7. Xwing_Red1

    Buyer Beware... Prinz Eitel Fredrich

    Nope.. they dont British BattleCruisers. Heavy main guns, light armor. German BattlCruisers: Lighter main guns, heavier armor
  8. Xwing_Red1

    Buyer Beware... Prinz Eitel Fredrich

    For the last time, It is not a Battleship, it s a "Battle Cruiser" (just like HMS Hood). However, Ship need some improvemtents. - Base Turret rotation: Should be slightly decresased, from 45 sec. to 42 sec - Turtle Back Armor: Ok, this one needs a mayor revision, some sources say that it had turtle back armor, while some others claim that it has not. Derfflinger-class battlecruisers had turtle back, so, It is quite logical/sure that Mackensens had it too. -AP Muzzle Velocity: I think that this is the main complain and why it is inconsistent; Currently it is 815 meters per second. It needs a slightly speed buff to 820 meters per second -->(It is more historical accurate)
  9. Xwing_Red1

    Premium Ship Review #116: Prinz Eitel Friedrich

    Ap mainly, It has 350mm guns and they are worse than the 356mm guns from tiers 5. Any one knows if WW1 German Battlecruisers had turtleback design?
  10. Xwing_Red1

    Premium Ship Review #116: Prinz Eitel Friedrich

    AP needs a slight buff
  11. Xwing_Red1

    Premium Ship Review #116: Prinz Eitel Friedrich

    Indeed, Yet, they are Battlecruisers with inferior armor/guns (like HMS Hood) . So, player must proceed with caution. British Battlecruiser=High caliber main guns, bad hull armor. German Battlecruiser=Small Caliber main guns, tougher hulll armor. By the way, does any one knows if WW1 German Battlecruisers had tuttleback design?
  12. Xwing_Red1

    Premium Ship Review #116: Prinz Eitel Friedrich

    Never heard of it.
  13. Xwing_Red1

    Premium Ship Review #116: Prinz Eitel Friedrich

    ¿Is there a written rule about it?
  14. Xwing_Red1

    Premium Ship Review #116: Prinz Eitel Friedrich

    FYI: It is a BATTLECRUISER, not a Battleship.
  15. Dear WG, dont forget to cosmetically update Tirptiz model.
×