ObnoxiousPotato

I will not encourage this (Submarines) in any shape or form. Unless you want to see submarines in randoms, clan battles, etc., I suggest others refrain from doing anything with submarines given the current mechanics. If there is any doubt with respect to my feelings about submarines being introduced into the game, here's an image to help convey what they are: lol!

@Heed_04 and @MidnightPhoenix07 : Very good and thanks! That makes sense. ;)

I have all "Unique/Legendary Upgrades" for every single Tier X ship which has one available (except for the CVs), but yet I see this in the Research Bureau: The remaining 7 upgrades are shown as "You already have this item". Is this a known problem or some sort of glitch which affects only certain accounts? Just wondering.

Better to just make a different game mode entirely for them. Why on Earth WG thinks having 2 or 3 CVs per team at tier IV is a good idea is completely beyond me. With all of the marketing they have been engaging in, you'd think the player base would be increasing dramatically if the majority of people were actually having fun at the lower tiers.

Wow! Now the California was deemed too strong? LOL.

Wow! Someone that understands! (unlike a certain person that I no longer care to see what they write due to their obtuseness)

No, you are wrong. The players are being silenced by denying them the information so that they can't comment. Can you get that concept through your head?

Wow! Your idea of a rampage is quite different than mine. I was just attempting to bring attention to the issue.

I disagree. It is not an over-exaggeration, not even an exaggeration. It's plain and simple that if you keep information from people, you deny them the opportunity to voice their opinions, so in effect, you silence them. Just because you or WG say someone overreacted doesn't make it true. WG just doesn't like people calling them out on their very questionable decision making process.

Perhaps not exactly apologizing for WG, but certainly trying to deflect or negate my criticism. I think it is you that can't see how keeping information from being released doesn't silence people. You disagree and that is fine.

It is you that doesn't understand. People can't voice their opinions on something if they do not know what is going on. Stop trying to be an apologist for WG. Thank you!

Yeah, to some degree it is. Seriously.

I never said they are keeping quiet. There is a disconnect somewhere though.

It's absurd to think that is the only problem with CVs in a surface-ship-centric game.

If WG is going to keep the ships under-wrap until just before being released, most of the feedback they are going to get during the testing will be more likely from those that are heavily invested in keeping WG happy. It's not like WG is literally silencing people, its just that there are so few CCs (that I've seen) which appear to give good accurate feedback. i.e., Have you seen the player quality in games lately? Everyone happy with the direction the game is going? Why are so many long-time players no longer playing? (hint: they don't like the direction the game is going) I could see keeping a "lid on things" during the initial testing of a new ship, but WG will get a whole lot more useful feedback by keeping it as open as possible and not rely on people that "hold their punches". So, in effect, they are silencing dissenters by not even giving them a chance to voice their opinions (or at least that seems to be what WG is trying to do).