ObnoxiousPotato

WeeGee doesn't give a rat's *** about casual players (new or returning) since they don't spend all that much money on the game. It is common knowledge that the Commander Skill (CS) RE-BORK was primarily aimed at milking money from longer term, competitive or "die-hard" players. For some players, the "CS Re-bork" was the proverbial final straw which caused them to stop playing. altogether.

Restarted the client a second time, and the battle results were updated. The "NAVAL BATTLE" button is now back as well on the port screen. Probably took 20 minutes or more for the issue to get resolved. Very strange. Played another battle, and it took a few minutes to update -- was performing without any delays or glitches up until about 30-40 minutes ago.

Restarted the client a second time, and the battle results were updated. The "NAVAL BATTLE" button is now back as well on the port screen. Probably took 20 minutes or more for the issue to get resolved. Very strange.

Something appears to be wrong with the NAVAL BATTLE Engagement (completed a battle, but NAVAL BATTLE screen still shows ship in battle tens of minutes after the battle has finished). Additionally, after restarting WoWS, the NAVAL BATTLE button on the port screen is no longer present. Anyone else seeing this?

Finished a battle several minutes ago with my attempts enabled, but NAVAL BATTLE screen still shows ship being in battle and both the star and attempt counts have not been updated. Restarted the game, and the problem persists. Additionally, the "NAVAL BATTLE" button on the port screen is NOT PRESENT (even though the engagement period has not ended nor have I used my attempts). Seems as though this is a server side issue with the database(s) and/or tables used for naval battles or the middle-ware between the database(s) and the client GUI.

True. I should have clarified by adding "... already bulging pocket book by pandering only to a small subset of the player base that need "metaphoric training wheels".". The CV apologist will of course counter with "We're not a small subset!" which is of course complete rubbish since only 1 or 2 out of 12 can normally participate in a given battle (and the CV apologists also make a point that CVs aren't in every Random battle). I wouldn't be so harsh with the criticism if there existed effective counters or the CV actually had to take a significant risk when attacking.

It is not a "review", but if you want my "honest opinion", this ship was not added to make the game better. It was conceived and added for the expressed purpose to further pad WeeGee's already bulging pocket book. Next we'll see a premium German CV that has the guided "Fritz X" bomb that can completely cripple or dev-strike someone, and all you have to do is click and move your mouse a little. I triple dog dare WeeGee to introduce the Fritz X bomb!

Video showing Trenlass' very first battle with a "less than completely optimal" build/configuration. Just wondering why WG didn't just add a "click on target ship, subtract 10K from their health and set fires" consumable for CVs rather than spending money on developing the skip bomb mechanics.

Possible future WeeGee response: "No, possibly yes, or perhaps maybe partially." Reality: WeeGee will only make it free if they think not doing so will significantly decrease their profits.

You implied some form of coordinated effort was in progress using more than just twitch. I would like to see examples of that. If you have none, then just say so. It is also important to know whether or not Flamu encouraged or took part in that type of activity. It "seems" almost as if you want Flamu crucified for alleged actions taken by (I'm assuming) a few people who may or may not have been joking around (if your allegations are in fact true, just "joking around" about such things is in extremely bad form).

Wow! I can tell you are a very well informed person.

"seemed"??? Do you have any actual evidence of people's efforts to "dox" someone?

AMEN and AMEN!

Your comparison is so off the mark. Consumers shopping or viewing commercials for tennis shoes haven't invested much time or possibly money into shoes they don't buy. Why is it that you continually go out of your way to defend the more "questionable tactics" used by WeeGee?

And to be fair, WeeGee is perfectly free to continue to employ tactics that discourage newer or more casual players from continuing to play the game. So much for trying to increase the player-base.