Jump to content

ObnoxiousPotato

Members
  • Content Сount

    420
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    20015
  • Clan

    [KP]

Community Reputation

408 Excellent

About ObnoxiousPotato

Recent Profile Visitors

855 profile views
  1. ObnoxiousPotato

    NO THANK YOU

    I will not encourage this (Submarines) in any shape or form. Unless you want to see submarines in randoms, clan battles, etc., I suggest others refrain from doing anything with submarines given the current mechanics. If there is any doubt with respect to my feelings about submarines being introduced into the game, here's an image to help convey what they are: lol!
  2. ObnoxiousPotato

    Research Bureau Question

    @Heed_04 and @MidnightPhoenix07 : Very good and thanks! That makes sense. ;)
  3. ObnoxiousPotato

    Research Bureau Question

    I have all "Unique/Legendary Upgrades" for every single Tier X ship which has one available (except for the CVs), but yet I see this in the Research Bureau: The remaining 7 upgrades are shown as "You already have this item". Is this a known problem or some sort of glitch which affects only certain accounts? Just wondering.
  4. ObnoxiousPotato

    This Is Why The Lower Tiers SUCK

    Better to just make a different game mode entirely for them. Why on Earth WG thinks having 2 or 3 CVs per team at tier IV is a good idea is completely beyond me. With all of the marketing they have been engaging in, you'd think the player base would be increasing dramatically if the majority of people were actually having fun at the lower tiers.
  5. ObnoxiousPotato

    Another Fine Example of WG Balans Logic

    Wow! Now the California was deemed too strong? LOL.
  6. ObnoxiousPotato

    Another Fine Example of WG Balans Logic

    Wow! Someone that understands! (unlike a certain person that I no longer care to see what they write due to their obtuseness)
  7. ObnoxiousPotato

    Another Fine Example of WG Balans Logic

    No, you are wrong. The players are being silenced by denying them the information so that they can't comment. Can you get that concept through your head?
  8. ObnoxiousPotato

    Another Fine Example of WG Balans Logic

    Wow! Your idea of a rampage is quite different than mine. I was just attempting to bring attention to the issue.
  9. ObnoxiousPotato

    Another Fine Example of WG Balans Logic

    I disagree. It is not an over-exaggeration, not even an exaggeration. It's plain and simple that if you keep information from people, you deny them the opportunity to voice their opinions, so in effect, you silence them. Just because you or WG say someone overreacted doesn't make it true. WG just doesn't like people calling them out on their very questionable decision making process.
  10. ObnoxiousPotato

    Another Fine Example of WG Balans Logic

    Perhaps not exactly apologizing for WG, but certainly trying to deflect or negate my criticism. I think it is you that can't see how keeping information from being released doesn't silence people. You disagree and that is fine.
  11. ObnoxiousPotato

    Another Fine Example of WG Balans Logic

    It is you that doesn't understand. People can't voice their opinions on something if they do not know what is going on. Stop trying to be an apologist for WG. Thank you!
  12. ObnoxiousPotato

    Another Fine Example of WG Balans Logic

    Yeah, to some degree it is. Seriously.
  13. ObnoxiousPotato

    Another Fine Example of WG Balans Logic

    I never said they are keeping quiet. There is a disconnect somewhere though.
  14. ObnoxiousPotato

    The *only* thing wrong with CV; no dogfights

    It's absurd to think that is the only problem with CVs in a surface-ship-centric game.
  15. ObnoxiousPotato

    Another Fine Example of WG Balans Logic

    If WG is going to keep the ships under-wrap until just before being released, most of the feedback they are going to get during the testing will be more likely from those that are heavily invested in keeping WG happy. It's not like WG is literally silencing people, its just that there are so few CCs (that I've seen) which appear to give good accurate feedback. i.e., Have you seen the player quality in games lately? Everyone happy with the direction the game is going? Why are so many long-time players no longer playing? (hint: they don't like the direction the game is going) I could see keeping a "lid on things" during the initial testing of a new ship, but WG will get a whole lot more useful feedback by keeping it as open as possible and not rely on people that "hold their punches". So, in effect, they are silencing dissenters by not even giving them a chance to voice their opinions (or at least that seems to be what WG is trying to do).
×