-
Content Сount
801 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
2864
Community Reputation
177 Valued posterAbout DemarticusStone
-
Rank
Ensign
- Birthday 03/17/1995
- Profile on the website DemarticusStone
-
Insignia
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
DemarticusStone changed their profile photo
-
I tested the Carriers for several days on the Public Test, everyone claiming that AA is Overpowered either has no idea how to grasp the new controls, or are blind as a bat. It was so easy for me to dodge Flak clouds that I was bored half of the time on the Test Server, when I was playing CV's, AA is a joke.
-
You're telling me...That the Developers..."Professional" Developers, of a Multi-Billion Dollar Gaming Company, can't find the problems that I see right off the bat...In 3 months? Wow, some "Competent" Developers right there, boys.
-
They might make the game, but WE the PLAYERS put the Bread on THEIR tables. So they damned well better listen to the players.
-
You are truly and utterly blind if you do not think something is wrong. This patch has went through MONTHS of testing, to FIND OUT what is wrong, so if you think my expectations were "stupid", you clearly pay zero attention to how testing is done.
-
Once again, the "fine" people of War Gaming have destroyed yet another game, and it all started in World of Tanks, with the Artillery "Nerf". The CV Rework has made it so carriers ultimately own every game they're in, doesn't matter what class you play, hell, you could play a dedicated Anti-Air Build, and they're STILL going to own the game, why? Because WG thought this was a "smart" decision to make. So hats off to the Developers that suggested Carriers get reworked, because you started the downfall of this game, and ultimately, the destruction of it, I hope you're proud of yourselves, and the "progress" you've made. I won't touch this steaming pile of trash until something is done with Carriers that DOESN'T involve them absolutely owning each and every match they're in.
-
I'd never be dumb enough to waste money on a ship like that, if I'm spending actual money, I'm doing thorough research.
-
Hahaha, what are you talking about? WG has always hated it's players, have you seen what they did to WoT?
-
I'm not hunting DD's, I could give a [REDACTED] less about DD's, this is when I'm shooting at Cruisers, or Battleships. Miss 8/10 Salvos, because the Dispersion is garbage.
-
I do, because it shows WG doesn't give two flying [REDACTED]'s about it's players.
-
"Challenged" doesn't even begin to explain this ship. This ship has good dispersion maybe 2/10 Salvos.
-
The Steel is about the only useful thing they did with this, and even then, the ship is so incredibly difficult to score damage with, the mission will be impossible to complete in 8 Days.
-
Be grateful for something that misses 80% of the time, and not due to poor lead but dispersion? Yeah, I'll be as grateful for that as a cat taking a dump in my shoes.
-
Thank you, War Gaming, for the Prinz Eitel Friedrich! It's made me realize how little you care about your playerbase, even though we pay your bills, and fund your company, you STILL find ways to shaft us. After busting my rear for no telling how long, to get the PEF, I realized something - It's a flaming bag of [REDACTED], armor's great, but the guns are dog [REDACTED] So thank you, again, War Gaming, for showing us you really care.
- 63 replies
-
- 29
-
-
-
-
Fix your Matchmaker, WG
DemarticusStone replied to DemarticusStone's topic in General Game Discussion
Yeah, I'm starting to see exactly what you mean. You'd figure I would be able to guess that from what goes on on the World of Tanks Forums, but, nope. -
Fix your Matchmaker, WG
DemarticusStone replied to DemarticusStone's topic in General Game Discussion
That's hilarious, considering every Khab I've seen, has ran smoke.