Jump to content


  • Content Сount

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles


Community Reputation

11 Neutral

About panzerdeal61

  • Rank
    Petty Officer
  • Birthday 08/10/1961
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
  • Interests
    History, photography, cartooning.

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. panzerdeal61

    Weekly Combat Missions: Great White Fleet

    Yup. Another messed up campaign. Ought to allow the tier 3 ships to participate as the Maine II [ B 10] was a pre dreadnaught class [ Tier 2 ?] and all the ships in the GWF were older than these. Since they did not introduce any "New" ships, [ pun intended] , the South Carolina would be the closest in age to the name. can we get something in the way of Continuity going here ? Tier 5 is just WAY off base for the theme... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_White_Fleet#Fleet_composition
  2. panzerdeal61

    Yucks 'n' Chuckles.

    Yup. got my Sponsor...LOL. A random comment on the shield got this one started...
  3. Be nice to attend. Brings up a couple of points: lack of an Indy in the game, say T 5 CVL, and a pity they didn't preserve the Cabot when they had the chance.
  4. panzerdeal61

    Developer Bulletin 0.8.2

    battletech / Robotech / Mobile Suit Gundam...design issues , and 12 years of off and on lawsuits..Just a memo from an old historian.
  5. panzerdeal61

    Developer Bulletin 0.8.2

    just remembering the old Battletech / Mechwarriors / Gundam lawsuit..and the mess IT created here..
  6. panzerdeal61

    Developer Bulletin 0.8.2

    Then again...wasn't Star Blazers copyrighted..? Just askin'..
  7. panzerdeal61

    Developer Bulletin 0.8.2

    Hey...the Cuz made a heck of an effort to get it north of the river..be a shame to waste it. fact is I started out before PC's even existed, so..
  8. panzerdeal61

    Developer Bulletin 0.8.2

    I mean . Hell, they can't even FIX a map they designed so's its readable..OOOPS.
  9. panzerdeal61

    Developer Bulletin 0.8.2

    No thanks. If I'd been in that mood, I have other options from '76...I'm here for HISTORICAL ships ad encounters..something you've kinda let us down on. Way i see it, the WHOLE point to gaming is to look at a given situation and think about the commanders involved...and could YOU have done any better in their shoes ? If ya want sci-fi, buy sci-fi.
  10. panzerdeal61

    too many updates

    I mean..come ON..updates for ships that aren't even there ??Gimme a break....THAT is One TOO MANY.
  11. panzerdeal61

    too many updates

    Frankly..anything that needs a revision every 6 weeks or so wasn't quite ready for release at the start... raised old school. You don't market till you have a FINISHED product to offer. If you gotta fix it later, you messed up..
  12. panzerdeal61

    too many updates

    Another update loading just now..they've added submarine controls to a game that does not seem to even HAVE submarines...yeah a TON of useless stuff.
  13. panzerdeal61

    too many updates

    Only one answer I'm thinking...staff must have reserved parking...
  14. panzerdeal61

    Summer Sale: Today's Deal!

    basically...another boring set up for a solo player, and like most other things, over priced to advance. Thanks, but no.
  15. panzerdeal61

    Armada: Benham

    If they have Mk.48's instead of Mk.Mk. 15's, MAYBE...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cj1YOV-Kz0 Mind you. I can see why Carrier and Destroyer skippers don't wanna see anything change..