Jump to content

Armforce

Beta Testers
  • Content count

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan

    [TCANS]

Community Reputation

3 Neutral

About Armforce

  • Rank
    Seaman
  • Profile on the website Armforce
  1. Wargaming needs to address this issue, grazing hits shouldn't be causing more damage than direct hits. A round grazed the top of my funnel for 7k damage and I got 4 to 5 direct hits on the other ship right dead center between the front super structure/funnel and rear super structure/funnel & only got 2k damage. On several other occasions I had the tip of my bow & stern grazed got up to 6500 in damage. This is totally unrealistic, that's like having major structural damage cause by scraping paint off the hull. Wargaming please look into this.
  2. invisibility

    I totally agree, camo on a ship was the means by deception is caused in course or range estimation, or in class identification. Not to make the ships invisible to naked eye or through ship mounted scopes or binoculars. Its like WW2 era warships having stealth ability. If you want a stealth that's what islands are for if you what sneak up or plan an ambush. Its really not fair BBs to dodge torpedoes from destroyers in open water and not see the destroyer or icons showing ships location behind an island then as that ship comes out from behind island it disappears or your getting hit by some ship you cant see on the other side of the map.
  3. Wargaming need to fix the matchmaker regarding carrier match up. It unfair for tier 4 & 5 carriers to be in a match against tier 6 carriers. Unfair for carriers that are not ability to manually drop or strafe vs a carrier that can. In double carrier matches should be tier 6 & 7 against tier 6 & 7 and tier 4 & 5 against tier 4 & 5 not tier 5 & 6 against tier 5 & 6. Solution to the problem either: fix matchmaker so that tier 5 & below does not get into matches with tier 6 & above, restore manual control to aircraft to tier 4 & 5, remove manual control of aircraft from all carriers.
  4. USN Cruiser Tree Split

    Helena CL-50 was a brooklyn class, Helena CL-113 was a cancelled either cleveland or fargo class, Helena CA-75 was a either baltimore or oregon city class, Buffalo CL-84 &110 were all cancelled cleveland or fargo class, Buffalo CL-99 was completed as a independence class carrier, Dallas CL-140 was a cancelled des moines class Seattle CA-11 was supposedly a tennessee class armored cruiser built between 1903-1906 and was originally named USS Washington but no WW2 cruiser was ever named Seattle. The Cleveland & Fargo are the same ship except couple differences the Cleveland had 2 funnels and 2 rear turrets which the Fargo had one funnel and 3 rear turrets.
  5. Helena CL-50 was a brooklyn class, Helena CL-113 was a cancelled either cleveland or fargo class, Helena CA-75 was a either baltimore or oregon city class, Buffalo CL-84 &110 were all cancelled cleveland or fargo class, Buffalo CL-99 was completed as a independence class carrier, Dallas CL-140 was a cancelled des moines class, Seattle CA-11 was supposedly a tennessee class armored cruiser built between 1903-1906 and was originally named USS Washington but no WW2 cruiser was ever named Seattle
  6. Nerf KAGA

    This carrier isn't OP, i have played several matches cant even close enough to drop anything. Planes keep getting shoot down by AA guns from surface ships. Needs buff for planes or something.
  7. I have been unable to use print screen since server issue or late update.. anyone else having this same problem?
  8. I reporting this mission to be flawed. The criteria to complete this mission is to be in the top 2 in ranked battle in a tier 8 ship.
  9. New Premium Ships Ideas

    Northampton-class cruiser, Oregon City-class cruiser or Fargo-class cruiser (Since they look alike or both if you like)
  10. New Premium Ships Ideas

    Question, why does people keep posting this same question over & over. Besides the fact their idea or suggest is a ship class that is already in the game. How about suggesting a ship class that is not in the game and stay within the nations & their already tech lines that are present. You can see WG missed or left out a lot of ship classes by chose or mistake. Which left a few suggestions open, to suggest other nation's ship class before WG has a chance to put it the game might be a waste right now. I have made that mistake in my suggests in the pass, some nations didn't have a big navy with multiple ship classes like the US. It might be challenging to put a tier 1 through 10 tech line for some nations. So lets make some really good suggestions.
  11. How to grind the Emerald?

    I total agree that emerald is the worse ship to grind. The best damage I could get with 5 hits is 990, the guns are crap. The smoke is worthless, the ship in full reverse still runs pass its own smoke. Even in smoke enemy ships still see you, even if you smoke behind island. The enemy ships don't even need to use radar or sonar. Besides the fact it only takes one salvo to sink this ship gives you really fair chance. Not to mention that matchmaker keeps placing you in a tier 7 match. That's what you expect from WG, set you up for failure.
  12. HMS Hood Release

    It's crap when WG is only selling it for 100 dollars in bundle only, I didn't want to spend that much money for it. I spend the standard price for it.
  13. Interesting, i never said what tier or type ship I was playing or never mention the captain points. And here i am playing, what i am gathering in a tier 7 battle maybe against Atlanta in a BB with a wrong captain setup.
  14. Ok, why cant you get a citadel with a torpedo? Where are the torpedo tubes for the US battleships (South Carolina to Colorado class)?
×