Jump to content

KTcraft

Beta Testers
  • Content count

    1,984
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    9525
  • Clan

    [STW]

Community Reputation

490 Excellent

About KTcraft

  • Rank
    Lieutenant
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

2,866 profile views
  1. I think it would fall under the warships game rule: 4.07. Using bots, clickers, macros, keyboard and mouse recorders, or any other similar methods to accumulate credits and experience without the participation or with passive participation of the player within the battle. (Excessive and repetitive passive play) as similar methods, as one of the "players" is being passive. Apart from going against the rules, it demonstrates extremely poor sportsmanship, and possibly lack of any actual playing ability. If you can't win through skill, better win through cheating i guess?
  2. I swear

    $0.25 for the swear jar and a bar of soap to wash your mouth! :)
  3. I don't see why its any more ok to be a jerk in online interactions over face to face interactions. Its true someone wont punch your lights out, and you wont get fired for being a complete [edited] online. You don't have all those "barriers" which filter day to day behavior. If you are a jerk online, we are seeing who you really are at your core. I hope you're proud of what you see. I have also seen the whole "People are too sensitive to words." These people though tend to get pissed though when you talk bad about their family. Maybe they're the one who needs to grow a thicker skin if they can be offended even when not the direct target of insults.
  4. Not a huge fan. Not at all.

    "Hilarious", not exactly the word I would use.
  5. If you are being "toxic" to someone because they fail your performance expectations, your expectations are too high.
  6. Not a huge fan. Not at all.

    And 30 minutes later.... Come on.... At least this time I had DF equipped but really....
  7. Not a huge fan. Not at all.

    Yeah... I remember going up against a Taiho and an Ibuki in my Mogami. Alone. That wasn't even a little fun.
  8. Seriously, I don't mind waiting another minute or two so I can get a playable match. Anyone looking to avoid this, if you are in que for more then a couple minutes, back out and reset it.
  9. Calm down guys, he's just joking. The line of reasoning is too goofy to be anything but a joke.... right?
  10. The next line of CVs

    I'd prefer wargaming overhaul carrier mechanics before trying to add new ones.
  11. You are implying that people are never justified in complaining about a potentially overperforming new line just because... it's a new line. Unfortunately, the Russian light cruiser Destroyer line is an obvious example of a line that people were well justified in complaining about. Our concern should not be whether a new line is strong or not, but whether it is well balanced against the other lines currently in game.
  12. Who have you seen in game

    Ran into Hellgrunt in his nelson.
  13. Who have you seen in game

    Met RichardLongfellow on the field of battle but a mere few days past.
  14. It's a shame you can't accept the possibility that a change in your perspective could result in an increase in intelligence and greater happiness than you currently possess. You're avoiding something that could be potentially fulfilling. In a way this already demonstrates a fallacy- An argument from incredulity: You can't imagine there might be a better way so you refuse to acknowledge any other possibility.
×