Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan


Community Reputation

65 Good

About NitroLauncher717

  • Rank
    Master Chief Petty Officer
  • Birthday 09/25/1992
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender


Recent Profile Visitors

1,321 profile views
  1. Unknown error, Game will not load

  2. Unknown error, Game will not load

    Correction, it is not fixed. I loaded the game, changed it to High Settings, and it worked for a battle with the Murmansk. I noticed it crashed on the results screen, and wrote it off, proceeded to try and play the Atlanta, and I never made it past the load-in screen. The game immediately sucked up my cpu and then freezes. I can load the garage, the missions screen, I just can't play a match. Being a clean install, I wish a Moderator or Dev would respond or acknowledge this as an issue. All I want is to just finish the North Cape missions :(
  3. Unknown error, Game will not load

    I reinstalled and it worked fine, I didn't change anything with the computer overnight, which is why it was an unusual error. It was whenever I tried to launch the game, regardless of thumbnail or via launcher, so something became rekt in my wows client
  4. Unknown error, Game will not load

    OK, running a full reinstall, what do I do should this issue persist? Open a support ticket?
  5. Unknown error, Game will not load

    I'm not tech savvy enough to know what's wrong here, but the game worked fine on 1.6.2018, and tonight I get this message. Do I need to just re-install the client?
  6. Out of body/ship experience

    No dev/Moderator has acknowledged this thread, or the issue as far as I'm aware. It's not in the thread of bugs they're aware of, and I haven't ever seen a red name in the "reading" list for this.
  7. I want to put mm is rigged threads to rest.

    I mean, EA tried something so ham fisted like P2W lootbox based-gameplay in 2017. That kind of [redacted] stopped flying on PC and Console PvP a long time ago in NA, however successful it is on Mobile. I can't see why a company that bases their entire premise of balance on a "blind" match maker (Not factoring players, but rather its a box with players in it to make matches with) wouldn't make it tilted in a way that makes them more money. I don't know what way I'd do it to be hidden, but I know that if it was truly a random matchmaker, I'd run the risk of somebody being able to constantly "hit the jackpot" and not need to spend money. At this stage, I'd be surprised if Wargaming were indeed an innocent party and not trying to bilk its players without them knowing. I realize thats what it may have started as, but not with as many steps the world videogame markets have taken with Microtransactions and Lootbox "it's just cosmetic" defenses. Every company has sat and watched it happen, with varying results (EA pushing the envelope while Geurrilla Games including them but not charging IRL cash at all), and with the Free to Play model, I can't see how they wouldn't try to match it lock-step to make more money. We even got lootboxes via EXP, and for sale in the shop now - I don't see Wargaming as a "better than them" company that wouldn't attempt it behind the scenes. EDIT: I will say I appreciate that it's smaller scale here and not stupidly blatant things like biased MM for premium players, or modes exclusive to Paying players. Even if it did start as mildly pay to win in tanks, the company has evolved and taken steps to be better perceived by the gaming community as a whole.
  8. I want to put mm is rigged threads to rest.

    One of them I watched came up with: Matchmaker and RNG are indeed influenced by personal performance, in a bell curve. When tracking the stats of a 35%er it was noted that their shots were consistently more accurate and more likely to be on a team stacked with a better composition than the opposing team. Compared to someone doing well whose shots were more likely to be a hair off Target and we're placed in a composition where they were one of the "better" vehicles and in turn expected to do better just to win (a team of fairly squishy allies and said person was a medium-weight with enough armor to turn the tide because of their skill) It's also been 5 years since this was done, but it stuck with me because of the findings across a couple hundred battles IIRC. Not enough to be ultra conclusive, but evident of some kind of skill-based influence DOES exist, much to the constant denial.
  9. Out of body/ship experience

    rezzing this, as it's not just one instance. The camera backed out just before I died, and beforehand I was able to continue shooting. As is visible the shots and torpedoes froze mid-flight, the North Carolina actually re-appeared when spotted again. Water and my ship on fire continued to move, however my ship did not sink. Shortly after appearing the Ncar stopped moving as well. When the round finished the map darkened and after 45 seconds the results screen loaded. Port loaded slowly, and none of the UI other than the "redeem container" which is in shot #3. Could not alt-F4, had to end process via Task Manager.
  10. In almost a year and a half? Someone earlier mentioned they'd gotten the Mo AND Nelson without paying for them, so your real issue here was the time investment. While agree that games should be games and I shouldn't be forced to play them like a job, there was ample time to go "wow I really want that, I'll play more" and push through. I too have many real life obligations - it's caused me to miss out on Yamamoto, the WG birthday events, the Kamikazes, and many other events. It's something that you must come to accept. If you don't play this game as a second job, you will not get everything. Nothing wrong with it, that's just the model they have going.
  11. Let's battle content

    The Let's Battle Tour was pushed back to November 4th, and I opened a thread sometime around September 27th asking if it would be possible to still get the physical items mailed to my friend and I, because the event was moved we became unnable to make the new date, November 4th, and the rules state you must show up to get them, which we would have barring the hurricane - the decision was made to postpone it the week of. So I asked in the official Let's Battle Tour thread, because Niko had been frequenting it. When noone answered I PMed NikoPower, it's still marked unread. So November 7th I asked Support. After the first response was literally a copy paste of the "sorry it's been postponed looking for you on the 4th! I got a human response. This is in the attachment. I was told "there a many people with this issue and the team is working to solve it" I let the ticket close as this seemed like I'd been heard. A few days ago, Radar X was active, I pmed him, same thing - it's still unread. It is now December 13th. All I wanted was a yes or no, and noone can even give me that. It's not even about the messenger bag or pins at this point, I'm being actively avoided and it's irritating. I also have not received the invitation card, so I paid $20 and don't even have the ID, while my friends came November 9th (so neither of us would have gotten in anyway.) Nice going on that.
  12. Notser: Shimakaze Supertest Discussed

    So if someone else comes in and locks it, is it double locked ? if so does that make it the only thread that's been locked twice? Inquiring minds need to know http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view8/20141121/5140148/in-after-the-lock-o.gif
  13. Notser: Shimakaze Supertest Discussed

    Stealth level 100
  14. US and other call Loot Boxes - Gambling

    To add to this, the whole kids angle is that it can develop conditioning for gambling in children. The argument is that it paves the way for gambling down the road by being "Gambling-lite". I detest the things. Why can't I just BUY the skins/stickers with in-game/real currency? It used to be on "level up" you were given an in-game currency and from there bought things in a game. Now it's Level up>get lootbox>maybe get currency and some other bobbles that you didn't want. Loot boxes are a game of chance
  15. Perhaps someone here can point me in the right direction. At present I can only run the game on mid level settings with 16 FPS. I feel this is way too low for what I'm running, as I am above the "recommended" settings for everywhere I look. (I think I am, but diminishing returns and all that jazz) All my drivers are up to date, and my Mobo requires ethernet, so the issue is not connection speed. Currently I am running Windows 10 Intel Core i5-4430 CPU @ 3.00GHz 16GB Ram on a Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 (3Gb dedicated) Warships isn't the only game this has trouble running, I can hardly play Forza Horizon 3 on 30 FPS (Locked) because the game crashes for no reason after about an hour and a half or less. I know the i5 is a bit older, but so many games are still asking for an i3, do I really need to buy a new i7+mobo+ddr4 just to play on acceptable settings? I ask because 3 months ago I ran it smoothly on High at 25-30 fps, and now my other computer (Andromeda X51) barely runs the game at all (Low at 7 fps), when in the same frame it did just fine at mid level settings. People are running the game on a friggin' tablet and I can hardly manage with a $1000 desktop a year old - what gives?