Jump to content

Burnsy

Beta Testers
  • Content Сount

    9,110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan

    [12TF]

Community Reputation

4,934 Superb

3 Followers

About Burnsy

  • Rank
    Vice Admiral
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Burnsy

    How TF do i play flint

    Flint is for Narai.
  2. Burnsy

    Why I deleted the game after enjoying it for years

    Radar goes through islands not because it is hard to change, because WG doesn't want it to change. It is intentional.
  3. Burnsy

    Why I deleted the game after enjoying it for years

    This game is not those games. There is not point in continuing to compare them. It's kind of like comparing EvE Online to...I dunno Elite Dangerous. Other than "space game", they are completely different games with completely different rules and goals.
  4. Burnsy

    Why I deleted the game after enjoying it for years

    They do in this game. It is much more of an arcade game, than a historical simulator and lots of things don't hold up if you compare them to reality. This is done for the sake of fun and appealing to a larger audience.
  5. Burnsy

    Why I deleted the game after enjoying it for years

    This game is not those games. Each game has it's own mechanics. If you don't want to play this game, don't. If you do want to play this game, if share the game replays you are talking about with us, it is very likely that we can explain what is going on, so that you have a better understanding. With a better understand of the game's mechanics, you can learn to use them to your own advantage and have a more enjoyable experience.
  6. It had steel available for whaling just like all the other dockyards.
  7. Burnsy

    Why I deleted the game after enjoying it for years

    You should share the games you are threatening to share with reddit...here, for us to look at. I am going to bet that you don't understand how spotting mechanics work and we can help explain what is going on, if we can see what you are talking about.
  8. OP != fun. For me at least. I have lots of German and some US BB that are secondary builds. I have Slava which is a long range accurate sniper. Neither of these play styles are on the bleeding edge of competitive, but that doesn't mean they are not fun take a match.
  9. Burnsy

    Is Enterprise still OP?

    I don't like ships because they are OP. I like ships because I like the play style. Now don't get me wrong, I don't dislike a powerful ship. If one I like is particularly powerful, I don't hate that about it, but that's not the reason I bought it. There are plenty of ships that were/are known OP that I could have purchased but I didn't. In order for me to purchase a ship, I have to like it for it's play style which means I will still like it, even if it takes the nerf bat.
  10. Burnsy

    Seigfried or Slava?

    In my experience Slava claps both cruisers and BBs like a truck, if they are broadside. It doesn't care what they are (barring DDs of course), if they are broadside, fun is about to occur. If they are not broadside, no fun is about to occur. You are looking at this from way to detailed and "serious" of a scope. Slava is not a widely competitive ship, you are not likely to see many in KOTS or CB. It's a hilarious gimmick ship who's home is random mode matches. This is because it relies on the red players to be dumb and do dumb things. The upshot is that the game....is literally filled with those and in randoms, she does not lack for targets. There are two types of BBs that I take out when I want to just have some fun. A brawling BB, I reach for Pom or Ohio, GK or Massachusetts. If I want to collect black ribbons, watch health bars drop like a rock in a single salvo, and get some funny comments on chat, I reach for Slava. I also have Thunderer and Thunderer is a blast in her own way, but more of then not, Slava get's the battle button. That is my experience with Slava. I wouldn't trade her in for anything, because she is the best in the game at what she does, which for me, is long range fun.
  11. Burnsy

    Seigfried or Slava?

    https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:Slava Pros: Long main battery firing range. Superb ballistics which make hitting shells at long range quite easy. Unique vertical dispersion parameters leading to an exceptionally flat spread. Unique horizontal dispersion formula that leads to great accuracy at long range (yet, at close range, the dispersion is worse compared to her peers). Amazing armor penetration at all ranges. Good firing angles. Relatively good concealment. Strong anti-air. Cons: Relatively few 406 mm guns (lacking the ability to overmatch 30 mm cruiser plating that many of her peers can pull off) Exceptionally long reload time; 0.5s longer than her sister, Kremlin. Slower turret traverse than her sister, Kremlin. Low HP pool and total potential HP (only 4 charges of Repair Party ()) Weak armor, with 32 mm deck armor plating and 25 mm bow and stern plating Large target, essentially the same as Kremlin visually. Large turning radius.
  12. Burnsy

    Seigfried or Slava?

    No. CB tend to give single ships a lot more attention and focused fire, and play at closer ranges, which are things that Slava doesn't want to happen. Long range is a good thing with her. To a degree, her accuracy actually gets worse at closer ranges.
×